Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T23:55:10.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Paradigm economy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Andrew Carstairs
Andrew Carstairs
Affiliation:
Department of English, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The inflexional paradigm, as a linguistic entity or concept, has not been a major preoccupation of theoretical linguists (at least in the English-speaking world) for several decades. For example, it is scarcely mentioned by Zellig Harris in his classic Methods in structural linguistics (1951). Nor have generative grammarians devoted much attention to it. Being interested originally in syntax, semantics and phonology to the almost total exclusion of morphology, they had no immediate incentive to reconsider such a squarely morphological concept. Quite apart from this, a positive reason for continuing to neglect, or reject, the paradigm seemed to flow from their approach to phonology. If phonological organization and phonological change were properly understood (they thought), then it could be seen that there was no need to invoke explicitly non-phonological factors such as ‘paradigm pressure’ or ‘analogical levelling’ in order to account for ‘exceptions’ to ‘sound laws’.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 115 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bánhidi, Z., Jókay, Z. & Szabö, D. (1965). Learn Hungarian (4th edn.). Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó.Google Scholar
Carstairs, A. D. (1981). Constraints on allomorphy in inflexion. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1972). The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doke, C. M. (1973). Textbook of Zulu grammar (6th edn.). Cape Town: Longman.Google Scholar
Ernout, A. (1953) Morphologie historique du latin (3rd edn.). Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Gotteri, N. (1981). Neuters, viriles and other objects of wonder: options in the Polish gender system. Paper read at the April 1981 meeting of the Linguistic Association of Great Britain, Manchester.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1973). Prolegomena to a theory of word formation. LIn 4. 3–16.Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1973). On the order of certain phonological rules in Spanish. In Anderson, S. R. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart. 59–76.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1951). Methods in structural linguistics. (Reprinted as Structural linguistics.) Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1971). Historical linguistics. In Dingwall, W. O. (ed.) (1978), A survey of linguistic science (2nd edn.). Stanford, Conn.: Greylock. 33–57.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1972). Explanation in phonology. In Peters, S. (ed), Goals of linguistic theory, 189–227. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Leumann, M. (1977). Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre (Handbuch der Altertumswissenschaft Abt. 2, Teil 2, Band 1). Munich: C. H. Beck'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Lieber, R. (1981). On the organization of the lexicon. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Matthews, P. H. (1972). Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1962). The morphology of the Tigre noun. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1959). In defence of WP. TPhS. 116–144.Google Scholar
Rycroft, D. & Ngcobo, A. B. (1979). Say it in Zulu. Teaching material available from the School of Oriental and African Studies, London. To be published by the University of Natal.Google Scholar
Sauvageot, A. (1951). Esquisse de la langue hongroise. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Sommer, F. (1948). Handbuch der Lateinischen Laut- und Formenlehre (2nd and 3rd edn.). Heidelberg: Carl Winter.Google Scholar
Wanner, D. (1972). The derivation of inflexional paradigms in Italian. In Casagrande, J. & Saciuk, B. (eds.), Generative studies in Romance languages. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar