Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T11:06:30.564Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The s-Ø alternation in French: a morphological solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

J. Durand  and
C. Lyche
J. Durand
Affiliation:
University of Essex and University of Oslo
C. Lyche
Affiliation:
University of Essex and University of Oslo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Our aim in this paper is to study the s-ø alternation found in pairs like côtecostal. As far as we know, the phenomenon has not been studied in detail by any generative phonologist. We have found in the literature some passing references to the question but all the solutions seem to be based on scanty evidence. In contradistinction to previous approaches, we have based our analysis on an exhaustive list of all the alternations in question. The source of our material is the Petit Robert (Rey et al., 1972), which includes approximately 50,000 words. We are perfectly aware of the fact that no French person knows/uses all these alternations and are therefore dealing with an ‘idealized’ speaker. But, since the solution we propose is heavily based on the morphological marking of words, it would be no blow to our analysis if one were to discover (as is possibly the case) that in a particular dialect of French very few of these forms are actually related.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , September 1978 , pp. 259 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aronoff, M. (1974). Word-formation in generative grammar. (Linguistic Inquiry, Monograph I.) Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Basboll, H. (1975). Schwa, jonctures et syllabification dans ies représentations phonologiques du français. AL 17:2.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1976). Reflections on language. London: Temple Smith.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1970). Les règlesphonologiques tardives et Ia morphologie dérivationnelle du français. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (1973) Les règles et les sons: introduction á Ia phonologie générative. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Dell, F. (forthcoming). A criticism of chapter II of Schane's French phonology and morphology (provisional title). To appear in French studies in linguistics.Google Scholar
Dell, F. & Selkirk, E. (forthcoming). On morphologically governed vowel alternations in French. To appear in a special European edition of LIn.Google Scholar
Dubois, J. et al. (1975). Lexis: dictionnaire de la langue française. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Hall, R. A. (1948). French. (Language Monograph No. 24, Structural Sketches, I.) Supplement to Lg 24.Google Scholar
Lightner, T. (1974). Preliminary remarks on derivarional morphology in French. In Rohrer, C. & Ruwet, N. (eds), Actes du colloque franco-allemand de grammaire transformationnelle, vol.2: Etudes de sémantique et autres. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rey, A., et al. (1972). Petit Robert: dictionnaire alphabétique et analogique de la langue française. Paris: Dictionnaire Le Robert.Google Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1968). French phonology and morphology. Cambridge Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Togeby, K. (1965). Structure immanente de la langue française, 2nd ed.Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Venneman, T. (1972). Rule inversion. Lingua 29. 209–242.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, J. R. (1975). Problèmes formels en phonologic générative. (Rapport de Recherches, 4.) Laboratoire d'Automatique Documentaire et Linguistique, Paris VII et Paris-Vincennes.Google Scholar