Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:00:08.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suzanne Fleischman, The future in thought and language. Diachronic evidence from Romance. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 36.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, Pp. xii + 218.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Christopher G. Lyons
Christopher G. Lyons
Affiliation:
University of Salford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Linguistics , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , September 1983 , pp. 481 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Lightfoot, D. (1979). Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, N. V. (1981). Grammaticality, time and tense. In Longuet-Higgins, H. C., Lyons, J. & Broadbent, D. E. (eds), The psychological mechanisms of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 295. 253–265.Google Scholar
Ultan, R. (1978). The nature of future tenses. In Greenberg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of human language. IV: Word structure. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 83–124.Google Scholar