Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T13:34:22.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Talmy Givón, Mind, code and context: essays in pragmatics. Hillsdale, NJ and London: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1989. Pp. xviii + 456.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Keith Allan
Affiliation:
Monash University.

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allan, K. (1986). Linguistic meaning (2 vols). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Allan, K. (1987). Hierarchies and the choice of left conjuncts (with particular attention to English). JL 23. 5177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. Subject and Topic, Li, Charles N. (ed.). New York: Academic Press. 2555.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (ed.) (1980). The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 950.Google Scholar
Craig, C. (ed.) (1986). Noun classes and categorization. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, J. (1980). Beyond definiteness: the trace of identity in discourse. In Chafe, W. L. (ed.), The pear stories: cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production, Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 203–74.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. (1979). Pragmatics: implicature, presupposition, and logical form. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. (ed.) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: a quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, T. (1984). Syntax: a functional typological introduction, vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, G. (1988). Pragmatics and natural language understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1985). Natural syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (ed.) (1985). Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, J. A. (1978). Definiteness and indefinileness. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London & New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (2 vols). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prince, E. (1981). Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Cole, P. (ed.), Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 233256.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (eds) (1986). Parallel distributed processing. Explorations in the microstructures of cognition (2 vols): Foundations. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. (1982). Dynamic memory: a theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: communication and cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar