Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-28T12:34:34.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alliance network size, partner diversity, and knowledge creation in small biotech firms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2015

Woojin Yoon ,
Diane Y. Lee  and
Jaeyong Song
Woojin Yoon
Affiliation:
College of Business and Economics, Hanyang University, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Diane Y. Lee
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University, Shillim Dong, Seoul, Korea
Jaeyong Song*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University, Shillim Dong, Seoul, Korea
*
Corresponding author: jsong@snu.ac.kr
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the effects on knowledge creation of network size and partner diversity formed through alliance relationships. These effects are tested empirically in the biotech industry setting, which is representative of industries that emphasize external collaboration. Using patent count as a proxy of knowledge creation, Poisson regression was employed to test our predictions empirically. The statistical results show an inverted U-shaped relationship between network size and knowledge creation. In addition, a negative relationship was observed between partner diversity and knowledge creation. This research suggests that small biotech firms should strive to achieve a balanced network size. Knowledge creation is better promoted in these firms through alliances with firms of similar organizational type. The value of this research lies in the fact that it provides new insight into properties of alliance networks by highlighting potentially negative consequences of having an oversized alliance network and partner diversity.

Keywords

network sizenetwork partner diversitysmall and medium-sized enterprisesknowledge creation
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 21 , Issue 5 , September 2015 , pp. 614 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abernethy, M. A., & Brownell, P. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24(3), 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acar, W., & Sankaran, K. (1999). The myth of the unique decomposability: Specializing the Herfindahl and entropy measures? Strategic Management Journal, 20, 969–975.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahuja, G., & Katila, R. (2001). Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms: A longitudinal study. Strategic Management Journal, 22(3), 197–220.Google Scholar
Argyres, N. S., & Liebeskind, J. P. (1998). Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35(4), 427–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, J. (1986). Strategic factor markets: Expectations, luck and business strategy. Management Science, 32(10), 1231–1241.Google Scholar
Bartholomew, S. (1997). National systems of biotechnology innovation: Complex interdependence in the global system. Journal of International Business Studies, 28(2), 241–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bas, T. G. (2006). Cooperation agreements in biotechnology companies: An advantage for the acquisition of new capabilities and growth. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 1(2), 7–20.Google Scholar
Bate, P. (1984). The impact of organizational culture on approaches to organizational problem-solving. Organization Studies, 5(1), 43–66.Google Scholar
Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, S. V. (2000). Don’t go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267–294.Google Scholar
Bruyaka, O. (2008). Alliance portfolio diversity and market scope: Direct and interaction effects on biotech firm’s exit. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 28(13), Article 4, http://digitalknowledge.babson.edu/fer/vol28/iss13/4/.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, S., Hadi, A. S., & Price, B. (2000). Regression analysis by example, 3th ed., New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Coetzer, A., Battisti, M., Jurado, T., & Massey, C. (2011). The reality of management development in SMEs. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(3), 290–306.Google Scholar
Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.Google Scholar
Deeds, D. L., & Hill, W. L. (1996). Strategic alliances and the rate of new product development: An empirical study of entrepreneurial biotechnology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 41–55.Google Scholar
Duysters, G. M., & Lokshin, B. (2011). Determinants of alliance portfolio complexity and its effect on innovative performance of companies. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28, 570–585.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. G., Murray, F., & Yu, R. (2003). Value creation and sharing among universities, biotechnology and pharma. Nature Biotechnology, 21(6), 618–624.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science, 7(2), 136–150.Google Scholar
Faems, D., De Visser, M., Andries, P., & Van Looy, B. (2010). Technology alliance portfolios and financial performance: Value-enhancing and cost-increasing effects of open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 785–796.Google Scholar
Fennell, M. L., & Adams, C. M. (2011). U.S. health-care organizations: Complexity, turbulence, and multilevel change. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 205–219.Google Scholar
Fraser, H., & Henderson, S. (2007). A marriage of minds: Making biopharmaceutical collaborations work. Retrieved from http://www-935.ibm.com/services/us/gbs/bus/pdf/g510-7855-00-biopharma.pdf.Google Scholar
Galunic, D. C., & Rodan, S. (1998). Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 19(12), 1193–1201.Google Scholar
George, G., Zahra, S. A., Wheatley, K. K., & Khan, R. (2001). The effects of alliance portfolio characteristics and absorptive capacity on performance: A study of biotechnology firms. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 12(2), 205–226.Google Scholar
Gittelman, M. (2006). National institutions, public-private knowledge flows, and innovative performance: A comparative study of the biotechnology industry in the US and France. Research Policy, 35(7), 1052–1068.Google Scholar
Goerzen, A. (2005). Managing alliance networks: Emerging practices of multinational corporations. Academy of Management Executive, 19(2), 94–106.Google Scholar
Goerzen, A., & Beamish, P. W. (2005). The effect of alliance network diversity on multinational enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(4), 1136–1144.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinot, J., Chiva, R., & Mallén, F. (2013). Organizational trust and performance: Is organizational learning capability a missing link? Journal of Management & Organization, 19(5), 559–582.Google Scholar
Greene, W.H. (1997). Econometric Analysis 3rd edition. London: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(4), 619–652.Google Scholar
Gulati, R. (2007). Managing network resources: Alliances, affiliations, and other relational asset. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gunasekara, C. (2006). Reframing the role of universities in the development of regional innovation systems. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(1), 101–113.Google Scholar
Hagedoorn, J. (1993). Understanding the rationale of strategic technology partnering: Interorganizational modes of cooperation and sectoral differences. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 371–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, L., & Bagchi-Sen, S. (2002). A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation, 22(4), 231–244.Google Scholar
Han, Y. J. (2007). Linking science and technology with industry. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 2(2), 7–17.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.Google Scholar
Huber, G. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literature. Organization Science, 2, 88–115.Google Scholar
Iacono, A., & Nagano, M. S. (2009). Interactions and cooperation in local production systems: An analysis of inhibiting factors related to specificities of small enterprises. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 4(2), 143–153.Google Scholar
Jeong, S. (2014). Strategic collaboration of R&D entities for technology convergence: Exploring organizational differences within the triple helix. Journal of Management & Organization, 20(2), 227–249.Google Scholar
Kenney, M. (1986). Biotechnology: The university–industrial complex. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.Google Scholar
Knoke, D., & Burt, R. S. (1983). Prominence. In R. S. Burt, & M. J. Minor (Eds.), Applied network analysis (pp. 195–222). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477–1490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14, 319–340.Google Scholar
Lütz, S. (1997). Learning through intermediaries: The case of inter-firm research collaborations. In M. Ebers (Ed.), The formation of inter-organizational networks (pp. 220–237). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mowery, D., Oxley, J., & Silverman, B. S. (1998). Technological overlap and inter-firm cooperation: Implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy, 27(5), 507–523.Google Scholar
Müller, C., Fujiwara, T., & Herstatt, C. (2004). Sources of bioentrepreneurship: The cases of Germany and Japan. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(1), 93–101.Google Scholar
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., & Wasserman, W. (1996). Applied linear regression models. Homewood, IL: Irwin Press.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36(7), 1016–1034.Google Scholar
Oh, H., Chung, M., & Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860–875.Google Scholar
Phelps, C. (2010). A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 890–913.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M. (2005). Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M., & Stuart, T. E. (1995). A role-based ecology of technological change. American Journal of Sociology, 100(5), 1224–1260.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M., Stuart, T. E., & Hannan, M. T. (1996). Networks, knowledge, and niches: Competition in the worldwide semiconductor industry 1984–1991. American Journal of Sociology, 102(3), 659–689.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Brantley, P. (1992). Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: Learning through networks?. In N. Nohria, & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form and action (pp. 366–394). Boston, MA: HBS Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 263–280.Google Scholar
Puranam, P., & Srikanth, P. (2007). What they know vs. what they do: How acquirers leverage technology acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal, 28(8), 805–825.Google Scholar
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 240–267.Google Scholar
Rice, J., Liao, T.-S., Martin, N., & Galvin, P. (2012). The role of strategic alliances in complementing firm capabilities. Journal of Management & Organization, 18(6), 858–869.Google Scholar
Roijakkers, N., Hagedoorn, J., & Van Kraneburg, H. (2005). Dual market structures and the likelihood of repeated ties-evidence from pharmaceutical biotechnology. Research Policy 34(2), 235–245.Google Scholar
Rothaermel, F. T., & Boeker, W. (2008). Old technology meets new technology: Complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 29(1), 47–77.Google Scholar
Rothaermel, F. T., & Deeds, D. L. (2004). Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: A system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal, 25(3), 201–221.Google Scholar
Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921.Google Scholar
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1974). The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4), 453–473.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. C. (2007). R&D alliances and firm performance: The impact of technological diversity and alliance organization on innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 364–386.Google Scholar
Santoro, M. D., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (2002). Firm size and technological centrality in industry-university interactions. Research Policy, 31(7), 1163–1180.Google Scholar
Schilling, M., & Phelps, C. (2007). Interfirm collaboration networks: The impact of large-scale network structure on firm innovation. Management Science, 53(7), 1113–1126.Google Scholar
Schrader, S. (1991). Informal technology transfer between firms: Cooperation through information trading. Research Policy, 20(2), 153–170.Google Scholar
Shan, W., & Song, J. (1997). Foreign direct investment and the sourcing of technological advantage: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, W., Walker, G., & Kogut, B. (1994). Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(5), 387–394.Google Scholar
Silverman, B. S., & Baum, J. A. C. (2002). Alliance-based competitive dynamics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 791–806.Google Scholar
Song, J. (2014). Subsidiary absorptive capacity and knowledge transfer within multinational corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 45, 73–84.Google Scholar
Song, J., Almeida, P., & Wu, G. (2003). Learning-by-hiring: When is mobility more likely to facilitate inter-firm knowledge transfer? Management Science, 49(4), 351–365.Google Scholar
Song, J., Asakawa, K., & Chu, Y. (2011). What determines knowledge sourcing from host locations of overseas R&D operations? A study of global R&D activities of Japanese multinationals. Research Policy, 40(3), 380–390.Google Scholar
Song, J., & Shin, J. (2008). The paradox of technological capabilities: A study of knowledge sourcing from host countries of overseas R&D operations. Journal of International Business Studies 39(2), 291–303.Google Scholar
Sorenson, J. B., & Stuart, T. E. (2000). Aging, obsolescence, and organizational innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 81–112.Google Scholar
Srivastava, M. K., & Gnyawali, D. R. (2011). When do relational resources matter? Leveraging portfolio technological resources for breakthrough innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 797–810.Google Scholar
Stuart, T. E. (1998). Network positions and propensities to collaborate: An investigation of strategic alliance formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 668–698.Google Scholar
Stuart, T. E., Hoang, H., & Hybels, R. C. (1999). Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(2), 315–349.Google Scholar
Stuart, T. E., Ozdemir, S. Z., & Ding, W. W. (2007). Vertical alliance networks: The case of university–biotechnology–pharmaceutical alliance chains. Research Policy, 36(4), 477–498.Google Scholar
Sytch, M., & Bubenzer, P. (2008). Research on strategic alliances in biotechnology: An assessment review. Handbook of Bioentrepreneurship, International Handbook Series on Entrepreneurship, 4, 102–128.Google Scholar
Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 39–63.Google Scholar
Uygur, U. (2013). Determinants of causal ambiguity and difficulty of knowledge transfer within the firm. Journal of Management & Organization, 19(6), 742–755.Google Scholar
Vasudeva, G., & Anand, J. (2011). Unpacking absorptive capacity: A study of knowledge utilization from alliance portfolios. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 611–623.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). The resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6, 76–92.Google Scholar