Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-16T01:02:17.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Determinants of causal ambiguity and difficulty of knowledge transfer within the firm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2014

Ugur Uygur
Ugur Uygur*
Affiliation:
Management, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, USA
*
Corresponding author: uuygur@luc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The knowledge-based view of the firm portrays knowledge assets as the basis of sustainable competitive advantage. However, leveraging the knowledge available to the firm is not straightforward. The transfer of best practices within the firm or the replication of a certain routine poses challenges for managers. Causal ambiguity of knowledge makes it difficult to transfer practices into other contexts within the firm. In this paper, a new framework is proposed that identifies four antecedents to causal ambiguity: complexity, tacitness, relevance to the existing knowledge base, and the locality of knowledge. The paper concludes with the implications of the framework.

Keywords

knowledge transfertheoretical perspectivesknowledge-based viewstrategic knowledge capabilitiestacit/explicit knowledge
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 19 , Issue 6 , November 2013 , pp. 742 - 755
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albino, V., Garavelli, A. C., Schiuma, G. (1998). Knowledge transfer and inter-firm relationships in industrial districts: The role of the leader firm. Technovation, 19, 53–63.Google Scholar
Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C. (2010). The impact of causal ambiguity on competitive advantage and rent appropriation. British Journal of Management, 21, 939–953.Google Scholar
Appleyard, M. M. (1996). How does knowledge flow? Interfirm patterns in the semiconductor industry. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 137–154.Google Scholar
Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Argote, L., Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 150–169.Google Scholar
Argote, L., McEvily, B., Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49, 571–582.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. (1974). The limits of organization. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependency in the economy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attewell, P. (1992). Technology diffusion and organizational learning: The case of business computing. Organization Science, 3, 1–19.Google Scholar
Badaracco, J. L. (1991). The knowledge link. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Becker, M. C. (2001). Managing dispersed knowledge: Organizational problems, managerial strategies, and their effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 1037–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birkinshaw, J., Nobel, R., Ridderstrale, J. (2002). Knowledge as a contingency variable: Do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure. Organization Science, 13, 274–289.Google Scholar
Bojica, A. M., Fuentes, M. D. M., Gómez-Gras, J. M. (2011). Radical and incremental entrepreneurial orientation: The effect of knowledge acquisition. Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 326–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., Robert, N. (1999). Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 439–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlile, P. C. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13, 442–455.Google Scholar
Cegarro-Navarro, J. G., Eldridge, S., Sánchez, A. L. G. (2012). How an unlearning context can help managers overcome the negative effects of counter-knowledge. Journal of Management & Organization, 18, 231–246.Google Scholar
Chang, Y., Gong, Y., Peng, M. W. (2012). Expatriate knowledge transfer, subsidiary absorptive capacity, and subsidiary performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 927–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chew, W. B., Clark, K. B., Bresnahan, T. (1990). Measurement, coordination and learning in a multi-plant network. In R. S. Kaplan (Ed.), Measures for manufacturing excellence. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 129–162.Google Scholar
Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.Google Scholar
Dyer, J. H., Nobeoka, K. (2000). Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 345–367.Google Scholar
Felin, T., Hesterley, W. S. (2007). The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and the new creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 32, 195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fransman, M. (1994). Information, knowledge, vision and theories of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3, 713–757.Google Scholar
Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Garavelli, A. C., Gorgoglione, M., Scozzi, B. (2002). Managing knowledge transfer by knowledge technologies. Technovation, 22, 269–279.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. K., Gino, F., Staats, B. R. (2012). Dynamically integrating knowledge in teams: Transforming resources into performance. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 998–1022.Google Scholar
Goh, S. C. (2002). Managing effective knowledge transfer: An integrative framework and some practice implications. Journal of Knowledge Management, 6, 23–30.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996a). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 109–122.Google Scholar
Grant, R. M. (1996b). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.Google Scholar
Guzman, G., Wilson, J. (2005). The soft dimension of organizational knowledge transfer. Journal of Management Knowledge, 9, 59–74.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R., Hansen, M. T. (2007). Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1133–1153.Google Scholar
Håkanson, L. (2010). The firm as an epistemic community: The knowledge-based view revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 1801–1828.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review, 35, 519–530.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. H., Clark, K. B. (1985). Exploring the sources of productivity differences at the factory level. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hayes, K. J., Fitzgerald, J. A. (2009). Managing occupational boundaries to improve innovation outcomes in industry-research organizations. Journal of Management & Organization, 15, 423–437.Google Scholar
Helfat, C. E., Eisenhardt, K. M. (2004). Inter-temporal economies of scope, organizational modularity, and the dynamics of diversification. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1217–1232.Google Scholar
Héliot, Y., Riley, M. (2010). A study of indicators of willingness in the knowledge transfer process. Journal of Management & Organization, 16, 399–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoopes, D. G., Postrel, S. (1999). Shared knowledge, glitches, and product development performance. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 837–865.Google Scholar
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: the contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88–115.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A. C., Dinur, A. (1998). Knowledge management processes and international joint ventures. Organization Science, 9, 454–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, R. J., Szulanski, G. (2007). Template use and the effectiveness of knowledge transfer. Management Science, 53, 1716–1730.Google Scholar
Katz, R., Allen, T. J. (1982). Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R&D Project Groups. R&D Management, 12, 7–19.Google Scholar
King, A. W., Zeithaml, C. P. (2001). Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 75–99.Google Scholar
Knockaert, M., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., Clarysse, B. (2011). The relationship between knowledge transfer, top management team composition, and performance: The case of science-based entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35, 777–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science, 3, 383–397.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1993). Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation. Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 625–645.Google Scholar
Kogut, B., Zander, U. (1996). What firms do? Coordination, identity, and learning. Organization Science, 7, 502–518.Google Scholar
Lakshman, C. (2011). Postacquisition cultural integration in mergers & acquisitions: A knowledge-based approach. Human Resource Management, 50, 605–623.Google Scholar
Lapré, M. A., Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003). Managing learning curves in factories by creating and transferring knowledge. California Management Review, 46, 53–71.Google Scholar
Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). The intraorganizational environment: Point-to-point versus diffusion. In F. Williams & D. V. Gibson (Eds.), Technology transfer: A communication perspective (pp. 43–62). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Lippman, S. A., Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 418–438.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. (1980). Knowledge: Its creation, distribution, and economic significance. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Perloff, R. M. (1993). The dynamics of persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy (corrected ed.) Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Prahalad, C. K., Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.Google Scholar
Presutti, M., Boari, C., Majocchi, A. (2011). The importance of proximity for the start-ups’ knowledge acquisition and exploitation. Journal of Small Business Management, 49, 361–389.Google Scholar
Raman, R., Bharadwaj, A. (2012). Power differentials and performative deviation paths in practice transfer: The case of evidence-based medicine. Organization Science, 23, 1593–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, R., DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15, 88–102.Google Scholar
Rivkin, J. W. (2000). Imitation of complex strategies. Management Science, 46, 824–844.Google Scholar
Rivkin, J. W. (2001). Reproducing knowledge: Replication without imitation at moderate complexity. Organization Science, 12, 274–293.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. (1983). The diffusion of innovation. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sanchez, R. (1997). Managing articulated knowledge in competence-based competition. In R. Sanchez & A. Heene (Eds.), Strategic learning and knowledge management (pp. 163–187). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 661–681.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1965). The architecture of complexity. In L. von Bertalanffy & A. Rapaport (Eds.), General systems yearbook: Yearbook of the Society for general systems, 10 (pp. 63–76). Ann Arbor, MI: Braun-Brumfeld.Google Scholar
Simonin, B. L. (1999). Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 595–623.3.0.CO;2-5>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, H. A., McKeen, J. D., Singh, S. (2007). Tacit knowledge transfer; making it happen. Journal of Information Science & Technology, 4(2), 23–44.Google Scholar
Smith, A. D., Zeithaml, C. (1996). Garbage cans and advancing hypercompetition: The creation and exploitation of new capabilities and strategic flexibility in two regional Bell operating companies. Organization Science, 7, 383–399.Google Scholar
Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 45–62.Google Scholar
Spender, J. C. (1998). The dynamics of individual and organizational knowledge. In C. Eden & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Managerial and Organizational Cognition – Theory, Methods and Research. London: Sage, 13–39.Google Scholar
Spender, J. C., Grant, R. M. (1996). Knowledge and the firm: Overview. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 5–9.Google Scholar
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 27–43.Google Scholar
Szulanski, G. (2000). The process of knowledge transfer: A diachronic analysis of stickiness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 9–27.Google Scholar
Teece, D. (1977). Technology transfer by multinational firms: The resource cost of international technology transfer. Economic Journal, 87, 242–261.Google Scholar
Tsoukas, H. (1996). The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue), 11–25.Google Scholar
Verbeke, W., Belschak, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Wuyts, S. (2011). Gaining access to intrafirm knowledge: An internal market perspective on knowledge sharing. Human Performance, 24, 205–230.Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (1994). ‘Sticky information’ and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40, 429–439.Google Scholar
Wang, P., Tong, T. W., Koh, C. P. (2004). An integrated model of knowledge transfer from MNC parent to China subsidiary. Journal of World Business, 39, 168–182.Google Scholar
Watson, S., Hewett, K. (2006). A multi-theoretical model of knowledge transfer in organizations: Determinants of knowledge contribution and knowledge reuse. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 141–173.Google Scholar
Williams, C. (2007). Transfer in context: Replication and adaptation in knowledge transfer relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 867–889.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and competence as strategic assets. In D. Teece (Ed.), The competitive challenge: Strategies for industrial innovation and renewal (pp. 159–184). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G., Szulanski, G. (2001). Replication as strategy. Organization Science, 12, 730–743.Google Scholar
Winter, S. G., Szulanski, G., Ringov, D., Jensen, R. J. (2012). Reproducing knowledge: Inaccurate replication and failure in franchise organizations. Organization Science, 23, 672–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zander, U., Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: An empirical test. Organization Science, 6, 76–92.Google Scholar