Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-sv6ng Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T16:14:07.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From social support to capabilities for the work–life balance of independent professionals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2016

Anne Annink
Anne Annink*
Affiliation:
Department of Public Administration, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: annink@fsw.eur.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This qualitative study aims to explain how social support enables independent professionals to achieve work–life balance. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 50 independent professionals in the Netherlands, Spain, and Sweden. The interview data were analyzed from a capability approach, from which work–life balance is understood in terms of capabilities. The most important sources of social support for independent professionals appeared to be their partner, family, as well as work and nonwork-related friends who were able to provide emotional and instrumental support. However, the extent to which social support can be converted into capabilities is influenced by individual (gender and cohabitation), institutional (the ease of doing business and formal childcare), and societal factors (financial hardship and familialism). The cross-national comparison shows that the institutional and societal context may hinder or reinforce social support for work–life balance, resulting in different experiences across countries.

Keywords

social supportwork–life balanceindependent professionalsqualitative researchcross-national
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , March 2017 , pp. 258 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albert, M. N., & Couture, M. M. (2013). The support to an entrepreneur. Sage Open, 3(2), 2158244013492779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T. D., French, K. A., Dumani, S., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). Meta-analysis of work–family conflict mean differences: Does national context matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 90, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annink, A., & den Dulk, L. (2014). De positie van vrouwelijke ZZP’ers in Nederland. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen en Bestuurskunde.Google Scholar
Annink, A., den Dulk, L., & Steijn, B. (2015a). Work-family state support for the self-employed across Europe. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 4(2), 187–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annink, A., den Dulk, L., & Steijn, B. (2015b). Work–family conflict among employees and the self-employed across Europe. Social Indicators Research, 126(2), 571–593.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boeije, H. (2009). Analysis in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Borra, C. (2010). Childcare cost and Spanish mother’s labour force participation. Hacienda pública española, (194), 9–40.Google Scholar
Burke, A. (2015). A freelancer and independent professional research agenda: The IPSE global workshops. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 1–6.Google Scholar
Cahn, D. D. (1987). Letting go: A practical theory of relationship disengagement and re-engagement. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Campos, B., Schetter, C. D., Abdou, C. M., Hobel, C. J., Glynn, L. M., & Sandman, C. A. (2008). Familialism, social support, and stress: Positive implications for pregnant Latinas. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14(2), 155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caproni, P. J. (2004). Work/life balance you can’t get there from here. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(2), 208–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crompton, R., Lewis, S., & Lyonette, C. (2007). Women, Men, Work and Family in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crompton, R., & Lyonette, C. (2006). Work-life ‘balance’ in Europe. Acta Sociologica, 49(4), 379–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danes, S. M., Craft, S. M., Jang, J., & Lee, J. (2013). Liability of newness: Assessing couple social support when starting a new business venture. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 39(4), 515–529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The’ what’ and’ why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DoingBusiness (2014). Economy rankings, Retrieved on 16th June 2016 from http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2014). Persons working part-time or with a second job, 2004–14 (% of total employment). Retrieved on 16th June 2016 from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Main_Page.Google Scholar
Eurostat (2015). Being young in Europe today. Eurostat statistical books. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
Feeney, B. C., & Collins, N. L. (2014). A new look at social support: A theoretical perspective on thriving through relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1088868314544222.Google Scholar
Ferrarini, T., & Sjöberg, O. (2010). Social policy and health: Transition countries in a comparative perspective. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19(s1), S60–S88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GEM (2015). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor – Adult Population Survey Measures, Retrieved from http://gemconsortium.org/data/key-indicators.Google Scholar
Gornick, J., & Meyers, M (Eds.) (2009). Gender equality: Transforming family divisions of labour. Real Utopias Project, Volume IV. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Grant, S., & Ferris, K. (2012). Identifying sources of occupational stress in entrepreneurs for measurement. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 4(4), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilbrecht, M. (2016). Self-employment and experiences of support in a work–family context. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 28(1), 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, B. (2011). The agency gap in work–life balance: Applying Sen’s capabilities framework within European contexts. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(2), 147–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, B. (2014). Worklife balance. The agency and capabilities gap. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaumotte, F. (2003). Female labour force participation: Past trends and main determinants in OECD countries. (Economics Department Working Papers No. 276). Retrieved on 14th June 2014 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2344556.Google Scholar
Johansson Sevä, I., & Öun, I. (2015). Self employment as a strategy for dealing with the competing demands of work and family? The importance of family/lifestyle motives. Gender, Work & Organization, 22(3), 256–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, P. H., Longest, K. C., & Aldrich, H. E. (2013). Can you lend me a hand? Task-role alignment of social support for aspiring business owners. Work and Occupations, 40(3), 213–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kossek, E. E., Pichler, S., Bodner, T., & Hammer, L. B. (2011). Workplace social support and work–family conflict: A meta‐analysis clarifying the influence of general and work–family‐specific supervisor and organizational support. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 289–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Korpi, W., Ferrarini, T., & Englund, S. (2013). Women’s opportunities under different family policy constellations: Gender, class, and inequality tradeoffs in western countries re-examined. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 20(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremakova, M. I. (2013). Too soft for economics, too rigid for sociology, or just right? The productive ambiguities of Sen’s capability approach. Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 54(3), 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s capability approach: Theoretical insights and empirical applications. Houten: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Lakey, B., Adams, K., Neely, L., Rhodes, G., Lutz, C. J., & Sielky, K. (2002). Perceived support and low emotional distress: The role of enacted support, dyad similarity, and provider personality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(11), 1546–1555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighton, P., & Brown, D. (2013). Future working: The rise of Europe’s independent professionals. London: EFIP/PCG.Google Scholar
Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring function of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leitner, A., & Wroblewski, A. (2006). Welfare states and work-life balance: Can good practices be transferred from the Nordic countries to conservative welfare states? European Societies, 8(2), 295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Z., Yates, J., & Picot, G. (1999). Rising self-employment in the midst of high unemployment: An empirical analysis of recent developments in Canada, (Statistics Canada Analytical Studies Working Paper No. 133). Retrieved on 21st June 2014 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=182639.Google Scholar
Mustafa, M., & Gold, M. (2013). ‘Chained to my work’? Strategies to manage temporal and physical boundaries among self‐employed teleworkers. Human Resource Management Journal, 23(4), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordenmark, M., Vinberg, S., & Strandh, M. (2012). Job control and demands, work-life balance and wellbeing among self-employed men and women in Europe. Society, Health & Vulnerability, 3.Google Scholar
OECD (2010). PF2.3:additional leave entitlements for working parents. OECD – social policy division – directorate of employment, labour and social affairs, Retrieved on 3rd March 2015 from www.oecd.org/els/socialpoliciesanddata/41927359.pdf.Google Scholar
OECD (2011). Doing better for families. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OECD (2013). Family database. Indicators. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm.Google Scholar
OECD. Stat (2012). ALFS Summary tables: Annual labour force statistics. Retrieved on 15th March 2015 from http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?r=870596#.Google Scholar
Parasuraman, S., & Simmers, C. A. (2001). Type of employment, work–family conflict and well‐being: A comparative study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(5), 551–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rapelli, S. (2012). European I-Pros: A study. London: Professional Contractors Group (PCG).Google Scholar
Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology bulletin, 26(4), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieman, S., Milkie, M. A., & Glavin, P. (2009). When work interferes with life: Work-nonwork interference and the influence of work-related demands and resources. American Sociological Review, 74(6), 966–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1985). Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984. The Journal of Philosophy, 82(4), 169–221.Google Scholar
Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2001). Work-nonwork conflict and the phenomenology of time beyond the balance metaphor. Work and Occupations, 28(1), 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, C. A., & Prottas, D. J. (2006). Relationships among organizational family support, job autonomy, perceived control, and employee well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(1), 100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van der Klink, J. J., Bültmann, U., Brouwer, S., Burdorf, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Zijlstra, F. R., & van der Wilt, G. J. (2011). Duurzame inzetbaarheid bij oudere werknemers, werk als waarde. Gedrag en Organisatie, 24(4), 342–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Gameren, E. (2013). The role of economic incentives and attitudes in participation and childcare decisions. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 34(3), 296–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vosko, L. F., & Zukewich, N. (2006). Precarious by choice? Gender and self-employment. In L. F. Vosko (Ed.), Precarious employment: Understanding labour market insecurity in Canada, 67–89. Montreal & Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, D. R. (2004). Effects of childcare activities on the duration of self‐employment in Europe. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 467–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar