Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T12:23:15.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of CEO Role Behaviour on Firm Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Mohammad Zakliki  and
Chris Christodoulou
Mohammad Zakliki
Affiliation:
School of Management, Division of Business, Humanities & Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn Victoria 3122
Chris Christodoulou
Affiliation:
School of Management, Division of Business, Humanities & Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn Victoria 3122
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The impact of executive leadership on organisational performance has been the focus of study for many years. This study, of CEOs of Australian publicly listed companies, used the Competing Values Framework developed by Hart and Quinn (1993) to measure CEO role behaviour. It consists of four competing roles: Vision Setter, Motivator, Analyser, and Task Master. These roles were tested against three dimensions of firm performance: Financial, Business, and Organisational Effectiveness Performance. The results showed that there was little functional connection between executive leadership and firm performance.

Further, the organisational effectiveness factor was the domain of firm performance most influenced by CEOs. Task Master role was the only role behaviour which had a positive relationship with any domain of firm performance.

Behavioural complexity of leadership behaviour had a positive relationship with organisational effectiveness performance in large firms and for firms following an analyser type of strategy. Behavioural complexity also had a positive relationship with business performance for firms following an analyser type of strategy. However, there was no association between behavioural complexity and financial performance regardless of situational factors.

These findings suggest that effective CEOs are required to demonstrate paradoxical skills, and that any approach for developing management skills must involve a heavy dose of practical application.

Keywords

• Executive Leadership• CEO Role Behaviour• Behavioural Complexity• Firm Performance
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Management & Organization , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , March 1996 , pp. 30 - 47
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bass, BM (1990) Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Implications (3rd Ed) New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Biddle, BG & Thomas, EJ (1966) Role Theory: Concepts and Research New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Brown, GB (1982) “Leader Behaviour and Faculty Cohesiveness in Christian Schools” Dissertation Abstracts International 43 (7a) 2170Google Scholar
Bullis, RC 1992 The Impact of Leader Behavioural Complexity on Organisational Performance PhD Dissertation Texas Technology UniversityGoogle Scholar
Carroll, G (1984) “Dynamics of publisher succession in newspaper organisation” Administrative Science Quarterly 29 pp 303–329Google Scholar
Day, DV & Lord, RG (1988) “Executive leadership and organisational performance: Suggestions for a new theory and methodology” Journal of Management 14 pp 453–464Google Scholar
Denison, DRHooijberg, R & Quinn, RE (1991) Paradox and performance: Toward a theory of behavioural complexity in managerial leadership Working paper The University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
Dess, GG & Robinson, RB (1984) “Measuring organisational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit” Strategic Management Journal 5 pp 265–273Google Scholar
Donaldson, G & Lorsch, J (1983) Decision Making at the Top New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Drucker, P (1973) Management: Tasks, responsibilities, practices New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Garrison, W & Scotch, N (1964) Scapegoating in baseball American Journal of Sociology 70 pp 69–70Google Scholar
Gupta, AK (1988) “Contingency perspectives on strategic leadership: Current knowledge and future research directions” In Hambrick, DC (ed) The Executive Effect: Concepts and Methods for Studying top Managers Greenwich Conn: JAI Press pp 5–22Google Scholar
Hambrick, DC (1982) “Environmental scanning and organisational strategy” Strategic Management Journal 3 (2) pp 159–174Google Scholar
Hambrick, DC (1989) “Putting top managers back in strategy picture” Strategic Management Journal, 10 Special issue pp 5–15Google Scholar
Hambrick, DC & Mason, P A (1984) “Upper echelons: The organisation as a reflection of its top managers” Academy of Management Review 9 (2) pp 193–207Google Scholar
Hart, SL & Quinn, RE (1993) “Roles Executives Play: CEOs, behavioural complexity, and firm performance” Human Relations 46 (5) pp 543–574Google Scholar
Haveman, HA (1993) “Ghosts of managers past: Managerial succession and organisational mortality” Academy of Management Journal 36 (4) pp 864–881Google Scholar
Hooijberg, R & Quinn, RE (1992) “Behavioural Complexity and the Development of Effective Managers” In Phillips, RL and Hunt, JG (eds) Strategic Leadership London: Quorum Books pp 161–175Google Scholar
House, RJ (1988) “Leadership research: Some forgotten, ignored, or overlooked findings” In Hunt, JG, Baliga, BR, Dachler, HP and Schriesheim, CA (eds) Emerging Leadership Vistas Lexington MA: Lexington Books pp 245–260Google Scholar
Hunt, JG (1991) Leadership: A New Synthesis Newbury Park: Sage PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Katz, D & Kahn, LR (1978) The Social Psychology of Organisation New York: WileyGoogle Scholar
Katz, RL (1974) Skills of an effective administrator Harvard Business Review 2 (4) pp 58–65Google Scholar
Kotier, JP (1988) The Leadership Factor New York: The Free PressGoogle Scholar
Lieberson, S & O'Conner, J (1972) Leadership and organisational performance American Sociological Review 37 pp 117–130Google Scholar
Lohman, D (1992) “The impact of leadership on corporate success: A comparative analysis of the American and Japanese experience” In Clark, KE, Clark, MB and Campbell, DP (eds) Impact of Leadership Greensboro NC: Center for Creative Leadership pp 59–80Google Scholar
Lombardo, MM & McCall, MW Jr (1982) “Leader on-line: Observation from simulation of managerial work” In Hunt, JG, Sekran, U and Schriesheim, CA (eds) Leadership: Beyond Established Views Carbonfdale IL: Southern Illinios University Press pp 50–67Google Scholar
Luthans, F (1988) “Successful versus effective real managers” Academy of Management Review 05 88 pp 127–132Google Scholar
Luthans, F & Lockwood, DL (1984) “Toward an observation system for measuring leader behaviour in natural settings” In Hunt, JG, Hosking, D, Schriesheim, CA and Stewart, R (eds) Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behaviour and Leadership New York: Pergamon Press pp 117–141Google Scholar
Meindl, JR & Ehrlich, SB (1987) “The romance of leadership and the evaluation of organisational performance” Academy of Management Journal 30 pp 90–109Google Scholar
Miles, R & Snow, C (1978) Strategy, Structure and Process New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
Miller, D & Droge, C (1986) “Psychological and traditional determinants of structure” Administrative Science Quarterly 31 pp 539–560Google Scholar
Miller, D & Friesen, P (1984) Organisation: A Quantum View Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Mintzberg, H (1975) “The manager's job: Folklore and fact” Harvard Business Review 53(4) pp 49–61Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H (1994) “Rounding out the manager's job” Sloan Management Review Fall pp 11–26Google Scholar
Mintzberg, H (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar
Peters, T (1989) “Facing Up to the Need for a Management Revolution” In Tushman, ML, O'Reilly, C and Nadler, DA (eds) The Management of Organisations: Strategies, Tactics, and Analysis New York: Harper & Row pp 7–32Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J (1981) “Management as a symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organisational paradigms” In Cummings, LL and Straw, BM (eds) Research in Organisational Behaviour Greenwich Conn: JAI Press 3 pp 1–52Google Scholar
Phillips, RL & Hunt, JG (eds) (1992) Strategic Leadership: A muliorganisational-level perspective London: Quorum BooksGoogle Scholar
Quinn, RE (1981) “A Competing values approach to organisational effectiveness” Public Productivity Review 5 pp 122–140Google Scholar
Quinn, RE (1988) Beyond Rational Management: Mastering the paradoxes and competing demands of high performance San Francisco: Jossey-Bass PublishersGoogle Scholar
Quinn, RE & Cameron, KS (1988) Paradox and Transformation: Toward a framework of change in organisation and management Cambridge, Mass: BallingerGoogle Scholar
Quinn, RE & Rohrbaugh, JA (1983) “A Spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Toward a competing values approach to organisational analysis” Management Science 29 pp 363–377Google Scholar
Quinn, REDenison, D & Hooijberg, R (1989) An Empirical Assessment of the Competing Values Leadership Instrument Working Paper The University of Michigan School of BusinessGoogle Scholar
Quinn, REFaerman, SRThompson, MP & McGrath, MR (1990) Becoming a Master Manager: A Competency Framework New York: Wiley & SonsGoogle Scholar
Quinn, RESpreitzer, GM & Hart, S (1991) “Challenging the assumptions of bipolarity: Interpretation and Managerial effectiveness” In Srivastva, S and Fry, R (eds) Executive Continuity San Francisco: Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
Romanelli, E & Tushman, M (1988) “Executive leadership and organisational outcomes: An evolutionary perspective’ In Hambrick, DC (ed) The Executive Effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers Greenwich Conn: JAI Press pp 129–146Google Scholar
Salancik, GR & Pfeffer, J (1977) “Constraints on administrator discretion: The limited influence of mayors on city budgets” Urban Affairs Quarterly 12 (4) pp 475–498Google Scholar
Sashkin, M & Burke, WW (1990) “Understanding and assessing organisational leadership” In Clark, KE and Clark, MB (eds) Measures of Leadership West Orange NJ: Leadership Library of America pp 297–325Google Scholar
Scott, W (1992) Organisations: Rational, natural, and open system (3rd Ed) Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar
Selznick, P (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar
Shortell, SM & Zajac, EJ (1990) “Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow's strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity” Academy of Management Journal 33 (4) pp 817–832Google Scholar
Snow, CC & Hrebiniak, IG (1980) “Strategy, distinctive competence, and organisational performance” Administrative Science Quarterly 25 pp 307–335Google Scholar
Steiner, GA & Miner, JB (1986) Management Policy and Strategy: Text, readings, and cases (3rd Ed) New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Stogdill, RM (1974) Handbook of Leadership New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Storm, PM (1984) “A further consideration of Competing Values” In Hunt, JG, Hosking, D, Schriesheim, CA, and Stewart, R, (eds) 1984 Leaders and Managers: International Perspectives on Managerial Behaviour and Leadership New York: Pergamon Press pp 82–89Google Scholar
Thomas, AB (1988) “Does Leadership make a difference to organisational performance?” Administrative Science Quarterly 33 pp 388–400Google Scholar
Tsui, AS (1994) “Reputational Effectiveness: Toward a mutual responsiveness framework” In Straw, BM and Cummings, LL (eds) Research in Organisational Behaviour Greenwich Conn: JAI Press pp 257–307Google Scholar
Venkatraman, N & Ramanujam, V (1986) “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: A comparison of approaches” Academy of Management Review 11 pp 801–814Google Scholar
Weick, KE & Daft, RL (1983) “The effectiveness of interpretation systems” In Cameron, KS and Whetten, DA (eds) Organisational Effectiveness: A comparison of Multiple models New York: Academic Press pp 71–93Google Scholar
Weiner, N & Mahoney, TA (1981) “A model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organisational, and leadership influences” Academy of Management Journal 24 pp 453–470Google Scholar
Westley, F & Mintzberg, H (1989) “Visionary leadership and strategic management” Strategic Management Journal 10 pp 17–32Google Scholar
Whetten, DA & Cameron, KS (1991) Developing Management Skills (2nd Ed) New York: Harper Collins PublishersGoogle Scholar
Woodridge, B & Floyd, SW (1990) “The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organisational performance” Strategic Management Journal 11 pp 231–241Google Scholar
Yukl, GA (1987) A new taxonomy for integrating diverse perspectives on management behaviour Paper presented at the American Psychological Association meeting New YorkGoogle Scholar
Yukl, GA (1989) “Managerial Leadership : A review of theory and research” Journal of Management 15 pp 251–289Google Scholar
Yukl, GAWall, S & Lepsinger, R (1990) “Preliminary report on validation of the managerial practices survey” In Clark, KE and Clark, MB (eds) Measures of Leadership West Orange NJ: Leadership Library of America pp 223–295Google Scholar