Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T05:37:11.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Telecommuting and Perceived Productivity: An Australian Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2015

Elsabet Tamrat
Affiliation:
Centre of Business Analysis and Research, University of South Australia
Malcolm Smith
Affiliation:
Centre of Business Analysis and Research, University of South Australia

Abstract

The concept of widespread “telecommuting” in a community envisages the presence of large numbers of employees who, instead of commuting to work, perform either all or a significant fraction of their tasks at home. It is widely accepted that large-scale adoption of telecommuting is just a matter of time in those countries with the necessary telecommunications infrastructure.

This paper reports on the conduct of a telecommuting project in a large Australian organisation. The data and the analyses demonstrate that, overall, the telecommuting project has been successful and brought benefits to both the employees and the organisation. The results also indicate the presence of strong positive links between the relationship/interactions telecommuters had with their supervisors, and the telecommuters' perception both of their own productivity, and their levels of satisfaction with the telecommuting experience. The tasks which telecommuters performed were also related to the employees' perception of productivity and job satisfaction.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arden, L. 1987, ‘Home-based workers can cut overhead and provide employees with a flexible schedule’, The Worksteader News, vol 4, no. 7, California, pp. 12.Google Scholar
Arthur, C. 1992, ‘How to give up going to work’, New Scientist, 10, pp. 24.Google Scholar
Atkinson, W. 1985, ‘Home/Work’, Personnel Journal, vol 64, no. 11, 11, pp. 105109.Google Scholar
Bailey, D.S. & Foley, J. 1990, ‘Pacific Bell works long distance’, HR Magazine, 08, vol 35, no. 8, pp. 5052.Google Scholar
Bates, V.L. 1992, ‘Working at home: Telecommuting and ISDN could do a lot for each other – but nobody seems to realise it’, IEEE Communications Magazine, 08, pp. 1415.Google Scholar
Bicknell, R. 1994, ‘Telecommuting in Australia – Impediments & enablers to its up-take’, Master's Thesis, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Brain, D.J. & Page, A.C. 1991. Review of Current Experiences and Perspectives for Teleworking, DG XIIIF, Commission of European Communities.Google Scholar
Calem, R.E. 1993, ‘Millions in US now working from home’, Financial Review, 3 05, pp. 6263.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 1984, Towards the Informational City? – High Technology, Economic Change, and Spatial Structure: Some Exploratory Hypotheses, UC Berkeley, no. IURD WP #430.Google Scholar
Caudron, S. 1992, ‘Working at home pays off’, Personnel Journal, vol 71, no.11, pp. 4049.Google Scholar
Christensen, K. 1988, The Era of Home-Based Work: Directions and Policies, Westview Press, Boulder and London.Google Scholar
Chung, P. 1992. ‘Telecommuting – The new management frontier’, Paper presented at the Australian Telecommunications User Group Annual Conference (ATUG'92), Melbourne.Google Scholar
Cross, T.B. & Raizman, M. 1986, Telecommuting, The Future Technology of Work, Dow Jones-Irvin, Homewood, Illinois.Google Scholar
Daniels, K., Lamond, D.A. & Standen, P. (eds) 2000, ‘Managing Telework: Perspectivesin Human Resource Management and Work Psychology, Thompson Learning, London.Google Scholar
De Sanctis, G. 1983, ‘A telecommuting primer’, Datamation, vol 29, no. 10, 10, pp. 214220.Google Scholar
DuBrin, A.J. 1991, ‘Comparison of the job satisfaction and productivity of tele-commuters versus in-house employees: A research note on work in progress’, Psychological Reports, vol 68, pp. 12231234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxbury, L.E., Higgins, C.A. & Mills, S. 1992, ‘After-Hours telecommuting and work-family conflict: A comparative analysis’, Information Systems Research, vol 3, no.2, pp. 173190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finlay, S. 1991, Benefits, Costs, and Policy Strategies for Telecommuting in Greater Vancouver, Grouse Mountain Research, North Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
Goodrich, J.N. 1990, ‘Telecommuting in America’, Business Horizons, 07-August, pp. 3137.Google Scholar
Gordon, G.E. 1991, ‘Work-at-home survey data shows continued growth; Telecommuters said to hit 5.5 million’, Telecommuting Review: The Gordon Report, Gil Gordon Associates, Monmouth Junction, New Jersey p. 10.Google ScholarPubMed
Gordon, G.E. 1993, ‘Arizona passes new pollution control measure, including provision for mandated telecommuting’, Telecommuting Review: The Gordon Report, Gil Gordon Associates, Monmouth Junction, New Jersey, pp. 13.Google Scholar
Gordon, G.E. 1997, The last word on productivity and telecommuting [Online]. Available: http://www.gilgordon.com/downloads/productivity.txt.Google Scholar
Gordon, G.E. 1998, The last word on productivity and telecommuting [Online]. Available: http://www.gilgordon.com/downloads/productivity.txt.Google Scholar
Gordon, G.E. & Kelly, M.M. 1986, Telecommuting How to Make it Work for You and Your Company, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Google Scholar
Gordon, G.E. & Peterson, D.L. 1988, Telework in North America: Status Report.Google Scholar
Gordon, S.I. & Arsdale, A.V. 1986, ‘Simulating some impacts of telecommunications/transportation substitution’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol 29, pp. 285294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, M., Hodson, N. & Gordon, G. 1993, Telework Explained, John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
Gurstein, P.C. 1990, ‘Working at home in the live-in office: Computers, space, and the social life of households’, PhD Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Hamilton, C.A. 1987, ‘Telecommuting’, Personnel Journal, vol 66, no.4, pp. 91101.Google Scholar
Hesse, B.W. 1995, ‘Curb cuts in the virtual community: Telework and persons with disabilities’, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 418425.Google Scholar
Higa, K. & Shin, B. 1998, ‘Telework: Existing research and the suggestion of future directions’, Preprint, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
Higa, K. & Wijayanayake, J. 1998, ‘Telework in Japan: Perceptions and implementation’, Proceedings of the 31st Annual Hawaii International conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 169177.Google Scholar
Hilvert, J. 1992, ‘The way ahead – or a high-tech sweatshop?’, Communications World, pp. 2527.Google Scholar
Huws, U, Korte, W.B. & Robinson, S. 1990, Telework: Towards the Elusive Office, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobs, S.M. & Sell, M.V. 1996, ‘Telecommuting: Issues for the IS manager’, Information Systems Management, Winter, pp. 1822.Google Scholar
Jones, J.C. 19571958, ‘Automation and Design (15)’, Design, 103, 104, 106, 108, 110.Google Scholar
Koenig, B.E., Henderson, D.K. & Mokhtarian, P.L. 1996, ‘The travel and emissions impacts of telecommuting for the State of California Telecommuting Pilot Project’, Transportation Research C, vol 4, no.1, pp. 1132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R.E. 1989, ‘Telecommuting: The trade-offs of home work’, Journal of Communication, vol 39, no.3, pp. 1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraut, R.E. & Grambusch, P. 1987, ‘Home-Based white collar employment: Lessons from the 1980 Census’, Social Forces, vol 66, no.2, pp. 410426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamond, D.A., Standen, P. &. Daniels, K. 1998, ‘Contexts, cultures and forms of teleworking’, in Management Theory and Practice: Moving to a New Era, ed Griffin, G., Macmillan, Melbourne, pp. 145157.Google Scholar
Lamond, D.A., Standen, P. &. Daniels, K. 1997, ‘Defining telework: What is it exactly?’, Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Telework, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2-5 09.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. 1993, ‘Telecommuters happier: Study shows’, Sydney Morning Herald, 4 06, p. 3.Google Scholar
Luukinen, A., Pekkola, J. & Suomi, R. 1996, ‘Telework arrangements demand in Finland’, Proceedings of the 29th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 366375.Google Scholar
Lynch, A. 1993a, ‘Historic award on teleworking close to fruition’, The Australian, 26 04, p. 10.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. & Skelton, S. 1996, ‘Teleworking in the information society’, Computing & Control Engineering, 02, pp. 3338.Google Scholar
Mason, R., Jennings, L. & Evans, R. 1982, ‘The computer home: Will tomorrow's housing come alive?’, The Futurist, 02.Google Scholar
Milburn, J. 1994, ‘Brisbane researchers get to work on telecommuter study’, Campus Review, 13-19 p. 7.Google Scholar
Moffatt, A. 1994, Telecommuting for Australian Business Challenges Facing Australian Managers, Paper presented at the AIC Conference, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar
Mokhtarian, P.L. 1990, ‘A typology of relationships between telecommunications and transportation’, Transportation Research, vol 24A, no. 3, pp. 231242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhtarian, P.L. 1991, ‘Defining telecommuting’, Transportation Research Record, 1305, pp. 273281.Google Scholar
Mokhtarian, P.L. & Bagley, M.N. 1998, ‘The impacts of gender, occupation, and presence of children on telecommuting motivations and constraints’, Journal of the Amer. Soc. For Information Science, vol 49, no. 12, pp. 11151134.3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhtarian, P.L. & Salomon, I. 1994, ‘Modelling the choice of telecommuting: Setting the context’, Environment and Planning A, vol 26, pp. 749766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhtarian, P.L., Handy, S.L. & Salomon, I. 1995, ‘Methodological issues in the estimation of the travel, energy, and air quality impacts of telecommuting’, TransportationRes. A, vol 29A, no.4, pp. 283302.Google Scholar
Mokhtarian, P.L. & Salomon, E. 1996a, ‘Modelling the choice of telecommuting 2: A case of the preferred impossible alternative’, Environment and Planning A, vol 28, pp. 18591876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhtarian, P.L. & Salomon, I. 1996b, ‘Modelling the choice of telecommuting 3: Identifying the choice set and estimating binary choice models for technology-based alternatives’, Environment and Planning A, vol 28, pp. 18771894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mokhtarian, P.L. & Salomon, I. 1997, ‘Modeling the desire to telecommute: The importance of attitudinal factors in behavioral models’, Transportation Research A, vol 31, no.1, pp. 3550.Google Scholar
Morant, E.I.A.J. 1993, ‘Power to the people’, Computing & Control Engineering, pp. 158161.Google Scholar
Nilles, J. 1988, ‘Traffic reduction by telecommuting: A status review and selected bibliography’, vol 1, no.2, JALA Associates Technical Reports, California, 06.Google Scholar
Nilles, J. 1994, Making Telecommuting Happen: A guide for Telemanagers and Telecommuters, Van Nostrand, Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
Nilles, J.M., Carlson, R.J., Gray, P. & Hanneman, G.J. 1976, The Tele-communications-Transportation Tradeoff: Options for Tomorrow, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Olson, M.H. 1983, ‘Remote office work: changing work patterns in space and time’. Communications of the ACM, vol 26, no.3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M.H. 1988, ‘Corporate culture and the homeworker’, in The New Era of Home-Based Work – Directions and Policies, ed Christensen, K., Westview Press, Boulder and London.Google Scholar
Olson, M.H. 1989, ‘Work at home for computer professionals: Current attitudes and future prospects’, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol 7, no.4, pp. 317338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M.H. & Primps, S.B. 1984, ‘Working at home with computers: Work and nonwork issues’, Social issues, vol 40, no.3, pp. 97112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlhausen, P. 1992, ‘The turning tide of telecommunications’, Rural Telecommunications, vol 11, no.2, pp. 2130.Google Scholar
Olszewski, P. & Mokhtarian, P. 1994, ‘Telecommuting frequency and impacts for State of California employees’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol 45, pp. 275286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagonis, J. 1994, ‘Homebased Teleworking Information Kit, Public Sector Union, Homebased Interim Award, Australia.Google Scholar
Pekkola, J. 1993, ‘The history of telework and the use of the labour force at two Finnish firms in the information technical industry’, Paper presented at The European Distance Working Conference, Robinson College, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Pratt, J.H. 1984, ‘HomeTeleworking: A study of its pioneers’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol 25, pp. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prystash, D.T. 1995, ‘Corporate attitudes and commitments to telecommuting’, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, vol 38, no. 2, pp. 9599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruppel, B.P. & Harrington, S.J. 1995, ‘Telework: An innovation where nobody is getting on the bandwagon’, DATA BASE Advances, vol 26, no. 2-3, pp. 87104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, I. & Salomon, M. 1984, ‘Telecommuting: The employee's perspective’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol 25, pp. 1528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandilands, P 1993, ‘Travelling executives have choices for remote access’, Financial Review, vol 3 05, p. 50.Google Scholar
Schiff, F.W. 1983, ‘Flexiplace: Pros and cons’, The Futurist, vol 16, no.3, p. 33.Google Scholar
Shamir, B. & Salomon, I. 1985, ‘Work-at-home and the quality of working life’, Academy of Management Review, vol 10, no.3, pp. 455465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinks, W. 1995, ‘Office-Based telecommuting: An international comparison of satellite offices in Japan & North America’, PhD. Dissertation, Graduate School of Business, University of Sydney, Sydney.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Standen, P. 1997, ‘Home, work and manage-ment in the information age’, Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management, vol 3, no.1, pp. 113.Google Scholar
Standen, P., Daniels, K. & Lamond, D.A. 1999, ‘The home as a work place: Work-family interaction and psychological well-being in telework’, Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol 4, no. 4, pp. 368381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanworth, J. & Stanworth, C. 1989, ‘Home truths about teleworking’, Personnel Management, vol 21, no. 11, pp. 4852.Google Scholar
TELSTRA/CWU Teleworking Agreement 1994, Telstra Corporation Limited and the Communications Workers' Union of Australia Agreement. Australian Industrial Relations Commission.Google Scholar
Thorp, D. 1993, ‘Employers find home workers twice as nice’, The Australian, 07 6, vol 39.Google Scholar
Toffler, A. 1981, The Third Wave, Pan books, London.Google Scholar
U. S. Department of Energy 1994, ‘Energy, emissions, and social consequences of telecommuting, Technical Report One, Office of Policy, Planning, and Program Evaluation, 06, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Wagel, W.H. 1988, ‘Telecommuting arrives in the public sector’, Personnel, 10, pp. 1417.Google Scholar
Weijers, T. & Weijers, S. 1988, ‘To introduce or not to introduce telework’, in eds van Rijn, F. & Williams, R., Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., pp. 413421.Google Scholar
Westfall, R.D. 1998, ‘Does telecommuting really increase productivity? Fifteen rival hypotheses. [Online].Google Scholar
Wood, J. 1992a, ‘Telecommuting: A new challenge for human resource managers’, Management Update, 04/May, pp. 89.Google Scholar
Wood, J. 1992b, ‘Teleworking: Defining the selection process’, Paper presented at the GTE National Technology in Government Conference, 02, Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
Wood, J., Alders, J. & Dudfield, J. 1990, ‘Teleworking in Australia: The Esso experience’, Report, Priprint, Graduate School of Management and Public Policy, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
Zamindar, M. 1995, Telework in Finland, (No. 116). Ministry of Labour.Google Scholar
Zampetakis, H. 1992, ‘Remote areas to get telecentre help’, Financial Review, 08 31, Sydney, Australia.Google Scholar