Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T15:40:17.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computer simulation of ferroelastic phase transition in LaNbO4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K. Parlinski
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980–77, Japan
Y. Hashi
Affiliation:
Research and Development Center, Hitachi Tohoku Software, Ltd., Sendai 980, Japan
S. Tsunekawa
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980–77, Japan
Y. Kawazoe
Affiliation:
Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University, Sendai 980–77, Japan
Get access

Abstract

A model of lanthanum orthoniobate which possesses a ferroelastic tetragonalmonoclinic phase transition is proposed. It contains only one particle per unit cell, but it is constructed consistently with symmetry changes at the phase transition. The model parameters are chosen to reproduce the bare soft mode, degree of deformation of the tetragonal unit cell to a monoclinic one, and the phase transition temperature. The ferroelastic system with free boundary conditions was simulated by the molecular dynamics technique, and the second order phase transition was reproduced. The studied annealing process shows formation of the stripe lenticular domain pattern, which has been interrupted by the appearance of a temporary band of perpendicularly oriented lenticular domains. The maps contain W′-type domain walls whose orientations are fixed only by interplay of potential parameters and not by symmetry elements. The simulated domain pattern has the same features as those observed by transmission electron microscopy.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.David, W. I. F., Mater. Res. Bull. 18, 749 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Wada, M., Nakayama, Y., Sawada, A., Tsunekawa, S., and Ishibashi, Y., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 47, 1575 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sapriel, J., Phys. Rev. 12, 5128 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Tsunekawa, S. and Takei, H., Phys. Status Solidi (a) 50, 695 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Brugger, K., J. Appl. Phys. 36, 739 (1965).Google Scholar
6.Nevitt, M. V., Chan, S-K., Grimsditch, M. H., and Fisher, E. S., in Materials Characterization, edited by Cheung, N. W. and M-A. Nicolet (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 69, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986), p. 391.Google Scholar
7.Hara, K., Sakai, A., Tsunekawa, S., Sawada, A., Ishibashi, Y., and Yagi, T., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 54, 1168 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Sleight, A. W., Chen, H-Y., Ferretti, A., and David, W. I. F., Mater. Res. Bull. 18, 1571 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.David, W. I. F., Glazer, A. M., and Hewat, A. W., Phase Trans. 1, 155 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Pinczuk, A., Burns, G., and Dacol, F. H., Solid State Commun. 24, 163 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Takei, H. and Tsunekawa, S., J. Cryst. Growth 38, 55 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Brixner, L. H., Whitney, J. F., Zumsteg, F. C., and Jones, G. A., Mater. Res. Bull. 12, 17 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Tsunekawa, S., Kasuya, A., Nishina, Y., and Fukuda, T., Mater. Trans. JIM 37, 650 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Parlinski, K. and Kawazoe, Y., J. Phys. I France 7, 153 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Bradley, C. J. and Cracknell, A. P., The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972), p. 105.Google Scholar