Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:31:23.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contact area determination in indentation testing of elastomers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Julia K. Deuschle ,
H. Matthias Deuschle ,
Susan Enders  and
Eduard Arzt
Julia K. Deuschle*
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute for Metals Research, Stuttgart, Baden Wuerttemberg 70569, Germany
H. Matthias Deuschle
Affiliation:
Institute of Statics and Dynamics of Aerospace Structures, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Baden Wuerttemberg 70569, Germany
Susan Enders
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute for Metals Research, Stuttgart, Baden Wuerttemberg 70569, Germany
Eduard Arzt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute for Metals Research, Stuttgart, Baden Wuerttemberg 70569, Germany
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author.e-mail: deuschle@mf.mpg.de
Get access

Abstract

To evaluate mechanical properties by means of nanoindentation, information on the contact area is crucial. However, the contact area is not directly accessible in experiments and is usually calculated according to the Oliver and Pharr procedure, which turned out to be unsatisfying when applied to viscoelastic materials like polymers. In this study, complementary in situ indentation testing and finite element analysis (FEA) were performed on silicone elastomers. Through this combination of techniques, several individual error sources in the conventional contact area determination have been identified and quantified. For shallow penetrations, contact areas after Oliver and Pharr were up to 40% smaller than the in situ testing results; for larger penetrations, the contact size was overestimated by approximately 6%. The deviations of the resulting mechanical properties were approximately 10%. Viscoelastic effects could be captured if dynamic indentation testing was performed.

Keywords

NanoindentationPolymerSimulation
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , March 2009 , pp. 736 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Bucaille, J-L., Felder, E., and Hochstetter, G.: Mechanical analysis of the scratch test on elastic and perfectly plastic materials with the three-dimensional finite element modeling. Wear 249, 422 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Shim, S., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: A critical examination of the Berkovich vs. conical indentation based on 3D finite element calculations, in Fundamentals of Nanoindentation and Nanotribology III, edited by Wahl, K.J., Huber, N., Mann, A.B., Bahr, D.F., and Cheng, Y-T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 841, Warrendale, PA, 2005), R9.5.1.Google Scholar
3.Li, M., Chen, W-M., Liang, N-G., and Wang, L-D.: A numerical study of indentation using indenters of different geometry. J. Mater. Res. 19, 73 (2004).Google Scholar
4.Yu, N., Polycarpou, A.A., and Corny, T.F.: Tip-radius effect in finite element modeling of sub-50nm-shallow nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 450, 295 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sun, Y., Bell, T., and Zheng, S.: Finite element analysis of the critical ratio of coating thickness to indentation depth for coating property measurements by nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 258, 198 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wang, H.F. and Bangert, H.: Three-dimensional finite element simulation of Vickers indentation on coated systems. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 163, 42 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Laursen, T.A. and Simo, J.C.: A study of the mechanics of microt indentation using finite elements. J. Mater. Res. 7, 618 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bolshakov, A., Oliver, W.C., and Pharr, G.M.: Influences of the stress on the measurement of mechanical properties using nanoin dentation: Part II. Finite element simulations. J. Mater. Res. 11, 760 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Lichinchi, M., Lenardi, C., Hauptand, J., and Vitali, R.: Simulation of Berkovich nanoindentation experiments on thin films using finite element method. Thin Solid Films 312, 240 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Bouzakis, K-D. and Michailidis, N.: Indenter surface area and hardness determination by means of a FEM-supported simulation of nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 494, 155 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Li, K., Wu, T.W., and Li, J.C.M.: Contact area evolution during an indentation process. J. Mater. Res. 12, 2064 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Larsson, P-L., Giannakopoulos, A.E., Söderlund, E., Rowcliffe, D.J., and Vestergaard, R.: Analysis of Berkovich indentation. Int. J. Solids Struct. 33, 221 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Swaddiwudhipong, S., Hua, J., Tho, K.K., and Liu, Z.S.: Equivalency of Berkovich and conical load-indentation curves. Modell. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 14, 71 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Swaddiwudhipong, S., Poh, L.H., Hua, J., Liu, Z.S., and Tho, K.K.: Modeling nano-indentation test of glassy polymers using finite elements with strain gradient plasticity. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 404, 179 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Gupta, S., Carillo, F., Balooch, M., Pruitt, L., and Puttlitz, C.: Simulated soft tissue indentation: A finite element study. J. Mater. Res. 20, 1979 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Chen, S.D. and Ke, F.J.: MD simulation of the effect of the contact area and tip radius on nanoindentation. Sci. China, Ser. G 47, 101 (2004).Google Scholar
17.Komanduri, R., Chandrasekaran, N., and Raff, L.M.: MD simulation of indentation and scratching of single crystal aluminum. Wear 240, 113 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Hasnaoui, A., Derlet, P.M., and Van Swygenhoven, H.: Interaction between dislocations and grain boundaries under an indenter-A molecular dynamics simulation. Acta Mater. 52, 2251 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Päzold, G., Linke, A., Hapke, T., and Heermann, D.W.: Computer simulation of nanoindentation into polymer films. Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 104, 521 (1997).Google Scholar
20.Yashiro, K., Furuta, A., and Tomita, Y.: Nanoindentation on crystal/amorphous polyethylene: Molecular dynamics study. Commit. Mater. Sci. 38, 136 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Sneddon, I.A.: The relation between load and penetration in the axissymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Anand, L. and Ames, N.M.: On modeling the micro-indentation response of an amorphous polymer. Int. J. Plast. 22, 1123 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Larsson, P-L. and Carlsson, S.: On microindentation of viscoelastic polymers. Polym. Test. 17, 49 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Cheng, Y-T. and Cheng, C-M.: Relationship between initial unloading slope, contact depth, and mechanical properties for conical indentation in linear viscoelastic solids. J. Mater. Res. 20, 1046 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Giannakopoulos, A.E. and Triantafyllou, A.: Spherical indentation of incompressible rubber-like materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 55, 1196 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Jerrams, S.J., Kaya, M., and Soon, K.F.: The effects of strain rate and hardness on the material constants of nitrile rubbers. Mater. Des. 19, 157 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Kuhn, W.: On the shape of fibrous molecules in solutions. Kolloid-Zeitschrift. 68, 2 (1934).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Guth, E. and Mark, H.: Rubber elasticity and its relationship to the structural model. Naturwissenschaften 25, 353 (1937).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Treloar, L.R.G.: The elasticity of a network of longchain molecules I. Trans. Faraday Soc. 39, 36 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Treloar, L.R.G.: The elasticity of a network of longchain molecules II. Trans. Faraday Soc. 39, 241 (1943).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.ABAQUS Theory manual (ABAQUS Inc., Providence, RI, 2006).Google Scholar
33.Mooney, M.: A theory of large elastic deformation. J. Appl. Phys. 11. 582 (1940).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Rivlin, R.S.: Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials IV: Further developments of the general theory. Philos. Trans. A 241, 379 (1948).Google Scholar
35.Ogden, R.W.: Large deformation isotropic elasticity-On the correlation of theory and experiment for incompressible rubberlike solids. Proc. R. Soc. London, Sect. A 326, 565 (1972).Google Scholar
36.Yeoh, O.H.: Characterization of elastic properties of carbon-black-filler rubber vulcanizates. Rubber Chem. Technol. 63, 792 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Arruda, E.M. and Boyce, M.C.: A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubberelastic materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 41, 389 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Valenta, L. and Molnar, L.: Comparison of the Neo-Hooke model and the Mooney-Rivlin model in FEA. Periodica Polytechnica Mech. Eng. 45, 95 (2001).Google Scholar
39.Raos, P.: Modelling of elastic behaviour of rubber and its application in FEA. Plast. Rubber and Compo. Process. Appl. 19, 293 (1993).Google Scholar
40.Deuschle, J., de Souza, E.J., Enders, S., and Arzt, E.: Crosslinking and curing kinetics of PDMS studied by dynamic nanoindentation, to be published.Google Scholar
41.Lucas, B.N., Oliver, W.C., Pharr, G.M., and Loubet, J-L.: Time dependent deformation during indentation testing, in Thin Films: Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI, edited by Gerberich, W.W., Gao, H., Sundgren, J-E., and Baker, S.P. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp Proc. 436, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), p. 233.Google Scholar
42.ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual (ABAQUS Inc., Providence, RI, 2006).Google Scholar
43.Hicsasmaz, Z. and Rizvi, S.S.H.: Effect of size and shape on modulus of deformability. LWT 38, 431 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Brown, R.: Physical Testing of Rubber, 4th ed. (Springer, New York, 2006), p. 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Chollacoop, N. and Ramamurty, U.: Experimental assessment of the representative strains in instrumented sharp indentation. Scr. Mater. 53, 247 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Treloar, L.R.G.: The Physics of Rubber Elasticity, 3rd ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1975).Google Scholar
47.Choi, Y., Lee, H-S., and Kwon, D.: Analysis of sharp-tip indentation curve for contact area determination taking into account pile-up and sink-in effects. J. Mater. Res. 19, 3307 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Deuschle, J., Enders, S., and Arzt, E.: Surface detection in nanoindentation of soft polymers. J. Mater. Res. 22, 3107 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49.Johnson, K.L., Kendall, K., and Roberts, A.D.: Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. London, Sect. A 324, 301 (1971).Google Scholar