Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T13:27:43.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cross Effect Between Ion and Electron Flows in Fe3–δO4

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jeong-Oh Hong*
Affiliation:
Solid State Ionics Research Laboratory, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–742, Korea
Han-Ill Yoo
Affiliation:
Solid State Ionics Research Laboratory, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 151–742, Korea
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. Present address: Institute of Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University, 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan. e-mail: johong@tagen.tohoku.ac.jp
Get access

Extract

The effective valence, of mobile cations (Fe2+, Fe3+) in semiconducting Fe3O4 was determined at elevated temperatures via Tubandt-type electrotransport experiments in association with the literature data on the cation diffusivity and total electrical conductivity. It has been found that the value for varies systematically from below 2 up to 3 with oxygen partial pressure at a fixed temperature. The effective valence is determined not only by the mobility difference of Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions but also by the cross effect between the cations and electrons upon their transfer . A value of between 2 and 3 may be attributed to the mobility difference between Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions even in the absence of the cross effect, but the values of < 2 clearly indicate that the cross effect is in play in Fe3O4.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Yoo, H-I., Schmalzried, H., Martin, M., and Janek, J., Z. Phys. Chem. N.F. 168, 129 (1990).Google Scholar
2.Yoo, H-I. and Martin, M., Ceram. Trans. 24, 103 (1991).Google Scholar
3.Yoo, H-I., Lee, J-H., Martin, M., Janek, J., and Schmalzried, H., Solid State Ionics 67, 317 (1994).Google Scholar
4.Lee, J-H. and Yoo, H-I., J. Electrochem. Soc. 141, 2789 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Janek, J., Martin, M., and Yoo, H-I., Ber. Bunsenges-Ges. Phys. Chem. 98, 655 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Janek, J., Ber. Bunsenges-Ges. Phys. Chem. 98, 1213 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Yoo, H-I. and Lee, J-H., Solid State Ionics 80, 5 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Yoo, H-I. and Lee, J-H., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 57, 65 (1996).Google Scholar
9.Lee, K-C. and Yoo, H-I., Solid State Ionics 86–88, 757 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Yoo, H-I. and Lee, K-C., Z. Phys. Chem. N. F. 207, 127 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Morin, F., Solid State Ionics 12, 407 (1984).Google Scholar
12. H. Du¨nwaldt and Wagner, C., Z. Phys. Chem. B22, 212 (1933).Google Scholar
13.Morin, F., J. Electrochem. Soc. 126, 760 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Lee, K-C. and Yoo, H-I., Solid State Ionics 92, 25 (1996).Google Scholar
15.Wagner, C., Prog. Solid-State Chem. 10, 3 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Lee, J-H., Martin, M., and Yoo, H-I., Electrochemistry 60, 482 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Dieckmann, R. and Schmalzried, H., Ber. Bunsenges-Ges. Phys. Chem. 81, 344 (1977).Google Scholar
18.Dieckmann, R., Ber. Bunsenges-Ges. Phys. Chem. 86, 112 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Dieckmann, R., Witt, C.A., and Mason, T.O., Ber. Bunsenges-Ges. Phys. Chem. 87, 495 (1983).Google Scholar
20.Dieckmann, R. and Schmalzried, H., Ber. Bunsenges-Ges. Phys. Chem. 90, 564 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Martin, M., Mater. Sci. Rep. 7, 1 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Dieckmann, R., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 59, 507 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar