Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T19:18:47.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The decisive role of oxide content in the formation and crystallization of gallium-lanthanum-sulfide glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Ruihua Li ,
David Furniss ,
Heath Bagshaw  and
Angela B. Seddon
Ruihua Li
Affiliation:
Centre for Glass Research, Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
David Furniss
Affiliation:
Centre for Glass Research, Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Heath Bagshaw
Affiliation:
Centre for Glass Research, Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Angela B. Seddon
Affiliation:
Centre for Glass Research, Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

A series of gallium-lanthanum-sulfide (GLS) glasses of different oxide concentration has been made and their spectroscopic properties, thermal properties, and the crystallization behavior of the glasses have been studied. It was revealed that the formability of GLS glasses relies on the existence of a certain amount of oxide content. The thermal stability of GLS glasses changes as a function of oxide concentration. The results have also shown that increasing oxide content caused a shift of the visible absorption edge to shorter wavelengths and an increase of absorption intensity in the infrared region at the multiphonon edge. Two closely related crystalline phases have been identified in the crystallized GLS glasses. For the first time it has been revealed that thermally stable GLS glasses can be made near the eutectic point of these two crystal phases by introducing an optimized amount of oxide.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 14 , Issue 6 , June 1999 , pp. 2621 - 2627
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Loireau-Lozac'h, A. M., Guittard, M., and Flahaut, J., Mater. Res. Bull. 11, 1489–1496 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Loireau-Lozac'h, A. M., Guittard, M., and Flahaut, J., Mater. Res. Bull. 12, 881–886 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hewak, D.W., Deol, R.S., Wang, J., Wylangowski, G., Medeiros Neto, J.A., Samson, B., Laming, R. I., Brocklesby, W. S., Payne, D. N., Jha, A., Poulain, M., Otero, S., Surinach, S., and Baro, M. D., Electron. Lett. 29, 237 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Dearaojo, M. T., Neto, J. A. M., Sombra, A. S.B, Oliveira, A. S., and Gouveianeto, A. S., Opt. Mater. 7 (1–2), 1–7 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Youden, K. E., Grevatt, T., Eason, R. W., Rutt, H. N., Deol, R. S., and Wylangowski, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63 (12), 1601–1603 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Morgan, S. P., Reaney, I. M., Buckley, R., Furniss, D., and Seddon, A. B., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar