Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T22:35:39.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domain variance and superstructure across the antiferroelectric/ferroelectric phase boundary in Pb1−1.5xLax(Zr0.9TiM0.1)O3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jesper Knudsen ,
D.I. Woodward  and
Ian M. Reaney
Jesper Knudsen
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, University of Sheffield, Mappin St., Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom
D.I. Woodward
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, University of Sheffield, Mappin St., Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Ian M. Reaney
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, Sir Robert Hadfield Building, University of Sheffield, Mappin St., Sheffield S1 3JD, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Transmission electron microscopy, x-ray diffraction, relative permittivity as a function of temperature, and polarization versus field loops were used to study the antiferroelectric/ferroelectric (AFE/FE) phase boundary in Pb1–1.5xLaxZr0.9Ti0.1O3 (PLZT, 100x/90/10) ceramics. X-ray diffraction and electrical measurements indicated a FE rhombohedral (R) to AFE tetragonal (T) phase transition between PLZT 2/90/10 and 4/90/10. Both phases exhibited superstructure reflections in electron-diffraction patterns at ½{hkl} positions consistent with rotations of the octahedra in antiphase. Previously, neutron diffraction suggested that the FER has an a−a−a− tilt system (Glazer notation), in agreement with its macroscopic symmetry. By analogy, it is proposed that the AFET phase has an a0a0c− tilt system. The AFE phase was also characterized by incommensurate superstructure along pseudocubic 〈110〉p directions, whereas the FE phase had extra commensurate superlattice reflections at 1/2{hk0}p positions. 1/2{hk0}p reflections are forbidden in both tilt systems, but their presence is explained by Pb ion displacements averaged along 〈111〉 but with short coherence antiparallel components along 〈110〉 directions. The antiparallel Pb displacements are coupled to an a−b−b− (a ≈ b) monoclinic tilt system in the vicinity of the AFE/FE boundary.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , February 2003 , pp. 262 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berlincourt, D., IEEE Trans. Sonics Ultrason. SU–13, 116 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, K.G., Chen, J., Udayakumar, K.R., and Cross, L.E., J. Appl. Phys. 75, 1699 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haertling, G.H. and Land, C.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54, 1 (1971).Google Scholar
Dai, X. and Viehland, D., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 3701 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirane, G., Suzuki, K., and Takeda, A., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 7, 12 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirane, G., Phys. Rev. 86, 219 (1952).Google Scholar
Shirane, G. and Hoshino, S., Acta Crystallogr. 7, 203 (1954).Google Scholar
Xu, Z., Viehland, D., Yang, P., and Payne, D.A., J. Appl. Phys. 74, 3406 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z., Dai, Z., and Viehland, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 3287 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z., Dai, Z., and Viehland, D., Phys. Rev. B 51, 6261 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, X., Xu, Z., and Viehland, D., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 5086 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, X., Xu, Z., and Viehland, D., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78, 2815 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Z., Dai, X., Li, J.F., and Viehland, D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2963 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricote, J., Corker, D.L., Whatmore, R.W., Impey, S.A., Glazer, A.M., Dec, J., and Roleder, K., J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 10, 1767 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, A.M., Acta Crystallogr. B 28, 3384 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, A.M., Acta Crystallogr. A 31, 756 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazer, A.M., Mabud, S.A., and Clarke, R., Acta Crystallogr. B 34, 1060 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reaney, I.M., Galzounov, A., Chu, F., Bell, A., and Setter, N., Br. Ceram. Trans. 96, 217 (1997).Google Scholar
Watanabe, S. and Koyama, Y., Phys. Rev. B 63, 134103-1 (2001).Google Scholar
Kay, H.F. and Bailey, P.C., Acta Crystallogr. 10, 219 (1957).Google Scholar
Reaney, I.M., Proc. Electroceram. V 1, 441 (1996).Google Scholar
Randall, C.A., Barber, D.J., Whatmore, R.W., and Groves, P., J. Mater. Sci. 21, 4456 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corker, D.L., Glazer, A.M., Dec, J., Roleder, K., and Whatmore, R.W., Acta Crystallogr. B 53, 135 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar