Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T04:10:21.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of Strain Rate During Equal-channel Angular Pressing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Hyoung Seop Kim
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Taejon, 305–764, Korea
Get access

Abstract

Strain rate is an important factor in plastic deformation because it determines the constitutive behavior of rate sensitive materials, e.g., dislocation density and flow stress evolution, deformation heat generation, etc. In the present study, the strain rate of workpiece materials during equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) was evaluated by a geometric approach. The results were compared to those of the finite element analyses of a model ideally plastic material with various mesh sizes. The derived equation for strain rate is in reasonably good agreement with the results of the finite element method. The effects of the die geometry (a channel angle and a corner angle) were investigated. The strain rate during ECAP increases with punch speed and decreases with die channel angle, die corner angle, and the width of the workpiece. The relation obtained can be used for analytical calculations of the deformation, thermal, and microstructural evolution behavior of materials during ECAP. In particular, the size of the deforming zone and the effect of the finite element size are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Sevillano, J.G., Houtte, P. van, and Aernoudt, E., Prog. Mater. Sci. 25, 69 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nes, E., Prog. Mater. Sci. 41, 129 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valiev, R.Z., Islamgaliev, R.K., and Alexandrov, I.V., Prog. Mater. Sci. 45, 103 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, V.M., Reznikov, V.I., Drobyshevkiy, A.E., and Kopylov, V.I., Russ. Metall. (English trans.) 1, 99 (1981).Google Scholar
Segal, V.M., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 197, 157 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 315, 122 (2001, in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.S., Seo, M.H., and Hong, S.I., Mater. Sci. Eng. 291A, 86 (2001).Google Scholar
Iwahashi, Y., Wang, J., Horita, Z., Nemoto, M., and Langdon, T.G., Scripta Mater. 35, 143 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cui, H.J., Goforth, R.E., and Hartwig, K.T., JOM-e 50 http://www.tms.org/pubs/Journals/JOM/9808/Cui/ (1998).Google Scholar
Lee, D.N., Scripta Mater. 43, 115 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prangnell, P.B., Harris, C., and Roberts, S.M., Scripta Mater. 37, 983 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuyan, L. and Zhongjin, W., J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 94, 193 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srinivasan, E., Scripta Mater. 44, 91 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semiatin, S.L., Delo, D.P., and Shell, E.B., Acta Mater. 48, 1841 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, J.R., Gholinia, A., Roberts, S.M., and Prangnell, P.B., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 287, 87 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeLo, D.P. and Semiatin, S.L., Metall. Mater. Trans. 30A, 1391 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semiatin, S.L., Berbon, P.B., and Langdon, T.G., Scripta Mater. 44, 135 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semiatin, S.L., Segal, V.M., Goforth, R.E., Frey, N.D., and DeLo, D.P., Metall. Mater. Trans. 30A, 1425 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.S., Mater. Trans. JIM 42, 344 (2001).Google Scholar
Berbon, P.B., Furukawa, M., Horita, Z., Nemoto, M., and Langdon, T.G., Metall. Mater. Trans. 30A, 1989 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, H.S., Hong, S.I., and Seo, M.H., J. Mater. Res. 16, 856 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen Inc., ABAQUS 5.8, Rhode Island (1999).Google Scholar
Yamaguchi, D., Horita, Z., Nemoto, M., and Langdon, T.G., Scripta Mater. 41, 791 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar