Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T20:18:54.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth of CeO2 thin films deposited on biaxially textured nickel substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

D. Eyidi
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Physik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
M. D. Croitoru
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Physik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
O. Eibl
Affiliation:
Institut für Angewandte Physik, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 10, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany
R. Nemetschek
Affiliation:
Theva Dünnschichttechnik GmbH, Rote-Kreuz-Straβe 8, D-85737 Ismaning, Germany
W. Prusseit
Affiliation:
Theva Dünnschichttechnik GmbH, Rote-Kreuz-Straβe 8, D-85737 Ismaning, Germany
Get access

Abstract

CeO2 films are technologically important as buffer layers for the integration of superconducting YBa2Cu3O7−δ films on {100}-biaxially textured Ni substrates, yielding a Ni–CeO2–YBa2Cu3O7−δ layer sequence. The Ni–CeO2 interface is a metal–oxide interface, and the misfit between substrate and film is about 9%. An epitaxial growth model was suggested for this system in the literature. The investigated films were deposited by a reactive thermal evaporation process at substrate temperatures of 650–670 °C with a thickness of 100 nm after deposition. The CeO2 films were characterized by plan-view and cross-section transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and scanning electron microscopy. The CeO2 films had a strong {100} biaxial texture with a roughness of approximately 90 nm. No intermediate layer could be found by cross-section transmission electron microscopy at the Ni–CeO2 interface. The films had columnar grains with diameters of 20–50 nm, much smaller than the grain size of the Ni substrate, which was larger than 1 μm. Small-angle grain boundaries and small amounts of 〈111〉-oriented grains were evidenced in plan-view samples by diffraction patterns. The Moiré fringes technique was applied and was ideally suited to image the small rotations (≤3°) of the small CeO2 grains with respect to the Ni substrate. These small rotations of small grains showed that the growth was nonepitaxial, however, biaxially textured. In the CeO2 film samples, nanovoids 5–10 nm in size were observed and were mostly located close to the film surface. A model for the growth of CeO2 thin films on nickel substrates can be proposed on the basis of our results.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Goyal, A., Lee, D.F., List, F.A., Specht, E.D., Feenstra, R., Paranthaman, M., Cui, X., Lu, S.W., Martin, P.M., Kroeger, D.M., Christen, D.K., Kang, B.W., Norton, D.P., Park, C., Verebelyi, D.T., Thomson, J.R., Williams, R.K., Aytug, T., Cantoni, C., Physica C 357–360, 903 (2001).Google Scholar
2.Boer, B. de, Reger, N., Fernandez, L.G.-R., Eickemeyer, J., Holzapfel, B., Schultz, L., Prusseit, W., and Berberich, P., Physica C 351, 38 (2001).Google Scholar
3.Knauf, J., Semerad, R., Prusseit, W., Boer, B. de, and Eickemeyer, J., IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 11, 2885 (2001).Google Scholar
4.Paranthaman, M., Goyal, A., List, F.A., Specht, E.D., Lee, D.F., Martin, P.M., He, Q., Christen, D.K., Norton, D.P., Budai, J.D., Kroeger, D.M., Physica C 275, 266 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Nemetschek, R. (2001, unpublished results).Google Scholar
6.Eyidi, D. and Eibl, O., Micron 33, 499 (2002).Google Scholar
7.Rabkin, E. and Klinger, L., Adv. Eng. Mater. 3, 277 (2001).Google Scholar
8.Fullman, R.L., J. Appl. Phys. 22, 448 (1951).Google Scholar
9.Holesinger, T.G., Foltyn, S.R., Arendt, P.N., Kung, H., Jia, Q.X., Dickerson, R.M., Dowden, P.C., Paula, R.F. de, Groves, J.R., and Coulter, J.Y., J. Mater. Res. 15, 1110 (2000).Google Scholar
10.Sutton, A.P. and Balluffi, R. W., Interfaces in Crystalline Materials (Oxford Science Publications, Clarendon Press, Oxford, U.K., 1995), p. 332.Google Scholar
11.Markov, I. and Stoyanov, S., Contemp. Phys. 28, 267 (1987).Google Scholar
12.Eibl, O. and Roas, B., J. Mater. Res. 5, 2620 (1990).Google Scholar