Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T07:21:58.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In situ surface modification and growth of ultrasmooth amorphous carbon films by direct carbon ion-beam deposition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. H. Sohn
Affiliation:
SKION Corporation, 50 Harrison Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
S. I. Kim
Affiliation:
SKION Corporation, 50 Harrison Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
Get access

Abstract

Very thin (<,100 nm) amorphous carbon films were grown on silicon substrates by unfiltered and filtered direct carbon ion beams. In situ surface modification was performed using C- energies in the range of 300–500 eV prior to the growth of the film. By lowering the energy of the C beam to 150 eV, an amorphous carbon film was continuously grown after the surface modification. High-resolution electron microscopy showed that the film/substrate interface was damaged by 400 and 500 eV C beams. The carbon composition profile at the interface investigated by electron energy-loss spectroscopy illustrated that the 500 eV C beam generated a 30 nm thick carbon/silicon mixing layer at the interface. The damage and mixing layers were not observed at 300 eV modification. Wear testing found that strong adhesion occurred in samples modified at 400 and 500 eV. However, at 300 eV, modified samples exhibited delamination failure, which indicated inferior adhesion of the films. Surface roughness evolution of 30, 60, and 90 nm thick films was investigated by atomic force microscopy. The film surface roughness decrease as a function of film thickness was much faster when the films were grown by the filtered C beam.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Takagi, T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A2 (2), 382 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Ko, Y.W. and Kim, S. I., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A15 (5), 2750 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sohn, M.H., Ahn, Y.O., Ko, Y.W., Park, Y., and Kim, S.I., in Ion-Solid Interactions for Materials Modification and Processing, edited by Poker, D. B., Ila, D., Cheng, Y-T., Harriott, L. R., and Sigmon, T.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 396, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), p. 629.Google Scholar
4.Yoshino, Nobuyuki, Shibuya, Yoshitsugu, Naoi, Kouichi, and Nanya, Takanori, Surf. Coat. Technol. 47, 84 (1991).Google Scholar
5.Demers, R.T. and Harris, D. G., SPIE Diamond Optics III 1325, 331 (1990).Google Scholar
6.Cooper, C.V., Holiday, P., and Matthews, A., Surf. Coat. Technol. 63, 129 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Koskinen, J., Hirvonen, J-P., Hannula, S-P., Pischow, K., Kattelus, H., and Suni, I., Diam. Relat. Mater. 3, 1107 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Tompa, G.S., Seidl, M., Ermler, W. C., and Carr, W.E., Surf. Sci. 185, L453 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Kim, M.J. and Carpenter, R. W., J. Mater. Res. 5, 347 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Felch, S.B., Brunco, D.P., Lee, B. S., Ahmad, A., Prall, K., and Chapek, D. L., Proceedings of the 1996 11th International Conference on Ion Implantation Technology, p. 753.Google Scholar
11.Oehrlein, G. S., Tromp, R. M., Tsang, J. C., Lee, Y. H., and Petrillo, E. J., J. Electrochem. Soc. 132 (6), 1441 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar