Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T16:21:22.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interface Mobility Under Different Driving Forces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

M. I. Mendelev
Affiliation:
Princeton Materials Institute & Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
D. J. Srolovitz*
Affiliation:
Princeton Materials Institute & Department of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544
L. S. Shvindlerman
Affiliation:
Institut fuÄr Metallkunde und Metallphysik, RWTH Aachen, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
G. Gottstein
Affiliation:
Institut fuÄr Metallkunde und Metallphysik, RWTH Aachen, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: srol@princeton.edu
Get access

Abstract

We used an Ising model to determine whether boundary mobility is an intrinsic material parameter or if it depends on the nature of the driving force for boundary migration. The simulations included both capillarity and external field-driven boundary migration. The external field-driven, flat boundary simulations showed that boundary mobility depends strongly on boundary inclination at low temperature but not at high temperature. On the other hand, the boundary mobility in capillarity-driven migration shows no dependence on boundary inclination and is independent of the boundary migration geometry. An initially circular grain shrinks as a circle and a half-loop boundary retracts with profiles predicted under the assumption that the boundary mobility is isotropic during capillarity-driven migration even when the temperature is very low and the external-field-driven boundary migration is extremely anisotropic. However, when an external field is superimposed on the capillarity driven migration of the circular boundary, the circular grain exhibits well-defined corners consistent with the simulation lattice symmetry. In this case, the boundary mobility is much different than if the external field were omitted. This is a clear demonstration that the boundary mobility can depend on the nature of the driving force for boundary migration.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gottstein, G. and Shvindlerman, L.S., Grain Boundary Migration in Metals: Thermodynamics, Kinetics, Applications (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999), p. 198.Google Scholar
Winning, M., Gottstein, G., and Shvindlerman, L.S. (unpublished).Google Scholar
Molodov, D.A., Gottstein, G., Heringhaus, F., and Shvindlerman, L.S., Mater. Sci. Forum 294, 127 (1999).Google Scholar
Fridman, E.M., Kopezkii, T.W., and Shvindlerman, L.S., Z. Metallk. 66, 533 (1975).Google Scholar
Hillert, M., Scripta Metall. 17, 237 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upmanyu, M., Smith, R.W., and Srolovitz, D.J., Interface Sci. 6, 41 (1998).Google Scholar
Mendelev, M.I. and Srolovitz, D.J., Acta Mater. 48, 3711 (2000).Google Scholar
Rikvold, P.A. and Kolesik, M., J. Stat. Phys. 100, 377 (2000).Google Scholar
Fridman, E.M., Kopezkii, T.W., Shvindlerman, L.S., and Aristov, V.J., Z. Metallk. 64, 458 (1973).Google Scholar
Straumal, B.B., Sursayeva, V.G., and Shvindlerman, L.S., Fiz. Met. Metalloved. 49, 1020 (1980).Google Scholar
Rath, B.B. and Hu, H., Trans. TMS-AIME 236, 1193 (1966).Google Scholar
Jhan, R.J. and Bristowe, P.D., in Atomic Scale Calculations of Structure in Materials, edited by Dan, M.S. and Schlüter, M.A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 193, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 189.Google Scholar
Upmanyu, M., Srolovitz, D.J., Warren, J.A., Lobkovsky, A., and Carter, W.C. (unpublished).Google Scholar
Ma, S.K., Statistical Mechanics, (World Scientific, Philadelphia, PA, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, W.K., Cabrera, N., and Frank, F.C., Philos. Trans. R. Soc. (London) Ser. A 243, 299 (1951).Google Scholar
Cahn, J.W. (private communication).Google Scholar