Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-30T10:25:35.519Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monte Carlo Simulation of Phase Separation Behavior in a Cu-Co Alloy Nanoparticle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Jae-Hyeok Shim ,
Byeong-Joo Lee ,
Jae-Pyoung Ahn ,
Young Whan Cho  and
Jong-Ku Park
Jae-Hyeok Shim
Affiliation:
Nano-materials Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 136-791, Korea
Byeong-Joo Lee
Affiliation:
Materials Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Yusong P.O. Box 102, Taejon 305-600, Korea
Jae-Pyoung Ahn
Affiliation:
Nano-materials Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 136-791, Korea
Young Whan Cho*
Affiliation:
Nano-materials Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 136-791, Korea
Jong-Ku Park
Affiliation:
Nano-materials Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul 136-791, Korea
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: oze@kist.re.kr
Get access

Abstract

The phase separation behavior in a Cu–Co nanoparticle was investigated using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. The modified embedded atom method (MEAM) was adopted to describe the interatomic potentials for the Cu–Co alloy system. Some of the cross potential parameters were fitted with experimental data such as mixing enthalpy and lattice constants of Cu–Co alloys. The present MC simulation combined with the MEAM potential describes well the phase separation between face-centered-cubic (fcc) Cu and fcc Co during the annealing of the particle.

Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 17 , Issue 5 , May 2002 , pp. 925 - 928
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Baskes, M.I., Phys. Rev. B 46, 2727 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Baskes, M.I. and Johnson, R.A., Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2, 147 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Baskes, M.I., Mater. Chem. Phys. 50, 152 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Baskes, M.I., Angelo, J.E., and Bisson, C.L., Modelling Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2, 505 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Gente, C., Oehring, M., and Bormann, R., Phys. Rev. B. 48, 13244 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H., and Teller, E., J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Yang, G.Y., Zhu, J., Wang, W.D., Zhang, Z., and Zhu, F.W., Mater. Res. Bull. 35, 875 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Ahn, J-P., Korea Institute of Science and Technology (2001, unpublished).Google Scholar
11.Tyson, W.R. and Miller, W.A., Surf. Sci. 62, 267 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Phillips, V.A., Acta Metall. 14, 271 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Satoh, S. and Johnson, W.C., Metall. Trans. A 23A, 2761 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Hyland, R.W. Jr., Asta, M., Foiles, S.M., and Rohrer, C.L., Acta Mater. 46, 4667 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Servi, I.S. and Turnbull, D., Acta Metall. 14, 161 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Ardell, A.J., Acta Metall. 20, 61 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Shiflet, G.J., Lee, Y.W., Aaronson, H.I., and Russell, K.C., Scripta Metall. 15, 719 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Parkin, S.S.P., Bhadra, R., and Roche, K.P., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2152 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar