Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T10:30:35.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oxygen transport through high-purity, large-grain Ag

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R. A. Outlaw
Affiliation:
NASA, Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia 23665
S. N. Sankaran
Affiliation:
Analytical Services and Materials, Inc., Hampton, Virginia 23666
G. B. Hoflund
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
M. R. Davidson
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611
Get access

Abstract

The permeation of oxygen through high-purity, large-grain Ag membranes has been studied over the temperature range of 400–800 °C. The permeability was found to be linear and repeatable, but the magnitude was 3.2 times smaller than that determined by past research. This factor may be due to negligible grain boundary diffusion that exists in this work. Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) does, however, suggest the importance of grain boundaries since intragranular oxygen was virtually undetectable and since AES line scans show substantial oxygen signals around the grain boundaries. The diffusivity measurements were found to exhibit two distinct linear regions, one above and one below a critical temperature of 630 °C. The high-temperature data have an activation energy (11.1 kcal mol−1) similar to that reported by others, but the low-temperature data have a comparatively larger activation energy (15.3 kcal mol−1). Vacuum desorption of the oxygen-saturated Ag was found to occur at the critical temperature of 630 °C, which is consistent with the increased mobility of oxygen atoms in the higher temperature regime. The higher activation energy observed in the lower temperature regime is probably due to the higher efficiency of traps.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Eichenauer, W. and Miiller, G., Z. Metallkd. 53, 321 (1962).Google Scholar
2Ramanarayanan, T. A. and Rapp, R. A., Metall. Trans. 3, 3239 (1972).Google Scholar
3Rickert, H. and Steiner, R., Z. Phys. Chem. 49, 127 (1966).Google Scholar
4Kolosov, E. H., Starkovskii, H., and Gryaznov, B. M., Zh. Fiz. Khim. 48, 1861 (1974).Google Scholar
5Gryaznov, B. M., Gul'yanova, C. G., and Kanizius, C., Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 47, 1517 (1973).Google Scholar
6Coles, R. E., Br. J. Appl. Phys. 14, 342 (1963).Google Scholar
7Crank, J., Mathematics of Diffusion (Oxford U. P., Oxford, 1967), 2nd ed., p. 42.Google Scholar
8Rovida, G., Pratesi, F., Maglietta, M., and Ferroni, E., Surf. Sci. 43 230 (1974).Google Scholar
9Outlaw, R. A., Peregoy, W. K., and Hoflund, G. B., NASA Tech. Pub. 2755 (1987).Google Scholar
10Beavis, L. C., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 43, 122 (1972).Google Scholar
11Mitchell, D. J., Harris, J. M., Patrick, R. C., Boespflug, E. P., and Beavis, L. C., J. Appl. Phys. 53, 970 (1982).Google Scholar
12Johnson, H. H. and Lin, R. W., in Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Effect of Hydrogen on the Behavior of Materials, edited by Bernstein, I. M. and Thompson, A. W. (AIME, New York, 1981), p. 3.Google Scholar
13Hoffman, R. E. and Turnbull, D. J., J. Appl. Phys. 22, 634 (1951).Google Scholar
14Engelhardt, H. A. and Menzel, D., Surf. Sci. 57, 591 (1975).Google Scholar
15Campbell, C. T., Surf. Sci. 157, 43 (1983).Google Scholar
16Outlaw, R. A., Sankaran, S. N., and Hoflund, G. B., J. Mater. Res. (to be published).Google Scholar