Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T11:00:26.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preferred orientation of BSCCO via centrifugal slip casting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Greg Steinlage ,
Ryan Roeder ,
Kevin Trumble ,
Keith Bowman ,
Shi Li  and
Mike McElfresh
Greg Steinlage
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907–1289
Ryan Roeder
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907–1289
Kevin Trumble
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907–1289
Keith Bowman
Affiliation:
School of Materials Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907–1289
Shi Li
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907–1289
Mike McElfresh
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907–1289
Get access

Extract

Due to the highly anisotropic properties of BSCCO superconductors, the bulk properties of these materials can be greatly affected by preferential orientation. Substantial c-axis orientation normal to the desired direction of current flow has been demonstrated by centrifugally slip casting lead-doped BSCCO-2223. The strong preferred orientation developed in the centrifugally slip-cast material demonstrates high critical current potential.

Type
Rapid Communications
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , April 1994 , pp. 833 - 836
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Bloomberg, D. E., Applegate, D. S., Tolt, T. L., Lanagan, M. T., Dusek, J. T., Poeppel, R. B., and Goretta, K. C., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 8 (7), 759–761 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Dimos, D., Chaudhari, P., and Mannhart, J., Phys. Rev. B 41, 4038–4049 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Malozemoff, A. P., Worthington, T. K., Zeldov, E., Yeh, N. C., McElfresh, M. W., and Holtzberg, F., Strong Correlation and Superconductivity, Springer Series in Solid State Sciences, edited by Fukuyama, H., Maekawa, S., and Malozemoff, A. P. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989), p. 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Jin, S., JOM 43 (3), 7–12 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Yamanaka, H., Matsuda, M., Takata, M., Ishii, M., Yamashita, T., and Koinuma, H., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 28 (12), L2185–L2187 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Haldar, P. and Motowidlo, L., JOM, (10) 54–58 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Kase, J., Morimoto, T., Togano, K., Kamakura, H., Dietderich, D. R., and Maeda, H., IEEE Trans. Magn. 27 (2), 1254–1257 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Sandhage, K. H., JOM 43 (3), 21–25 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Wenk, H. R. and Phillips, D. S., Physica C 200 (1–2), 105–112 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Gao, W., Chen, J., Yang, C., McNabb, D., and Vander Sande, J., Physica C 193 (3–4), 455–462 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Sandlin, M., Peterson, C., and Bowman, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
12Bean, C. P., Rev. Mod. Phys. 36, 31–39 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar