Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T04:25:39.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sintering characteristics of nanocrystalline TiO2—A study combining small angle neutron scattering and nitrogen absorption–BET

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

W. Wagner
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
R.S. Averback
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1304 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801
H. Hahn
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, 1304 West Green Street, Urbana, Illinois 61801
W. Petry
Affiliation:
Institute Laue Langevin, 156X, F-38042, Grenoble, France
A. Wiedenmann
Affiliation:
Hahn Meitner Institute, Glienicker Str. 100, D-1000, Berlin 39, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Small angle neutron scattering (SANS) was employed to characterize the pore structure of nanophase TiO2 ceramic materials compacted at different temperatures. Nanophase samples, produced by inert gas condensation, were compacted at 25, 290, 413, and 550 °C using a pressure of ≍1 GPa. The pore size distribution of the sample compacted at room temperature was very broad, with sizes ranging from ≍3–30 nm and pores comprising 38% of the sample volume. Compaction at 290 and 413 °C reduced the pore volume to 25% and 20%, respectively, by eliminating pores at both the small and large ends of the distribution. Compaction at 550 °C resulted in a pore volume that was less than 8%. Complications in the SANS analysis arising from the scattering from grain boundaries are discussed. The results from SANS are compared with those derived from nitrogen absorption, BET, measurements.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Averback, R. S., Höfler, H. J., Hahn, H., and Logas, J. C., Acta Metall. et Materiala (in press).Google Scholar
2.Hahn, H., Logas, J., Höfler, H. J., Kurath, P., and Averback, R. S., in Superplasticity in Metals, Ceramics, and Intermetallics, edited by Mayo, M. J., Kobayoshi, M., and Wadsworth, J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 196, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), p. 71.Google Scholar
3.Karch, H., Birringer, R., and Gleiter, H., Nature 330, 556 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Siegel, R. W., Ramasamy, R., Hahn, H., Zongquan, Li, Ting, Lu, and Gronsky, R., J. Mater. Res. 3, 1367 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Höfler, H. J. and Averback, R. S., Scripta Metall. et Materiala 24, 2401 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hahn, H., Logas, J., and Averback, R. S., J. Mater. Res. 5, 609 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Kostorz, G., Mater. Sci. Forum 27/28, 325 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Birringer, R., Herr, U., and Gleiter, H., Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 27 (suppl.), 43 (1986).Google Scholar
9.Ibel, K., J. Appl. Cryst. 9, 296 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Petry, W., unpublished research.Google Scholar
11.Brook, R. J., Proc. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 32, 7 (1982).Google Scholar
12. The pore volume was deduced from the equation, 0.92ρ0 × (l − f p) + 0.00ρ0f p = 0.62ρ0.Google Scholar