Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-26T15:03:30.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The solidification of large sections in ceramic injection molding: Part II. Modulated pressure molding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

T. Zhang  and
J.R.G. Evans
T. Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Technology, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
J.R.G. Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Technology, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, United Kingdom
Get access

Abstract

Cylindrical moldings of 20 and 40 mm diameter were injection molded with the application of modulated hold pressure using a well-characterized alumina-polypropylene suspension. The effect of frequency on sprue solidification was explored. For the smaller moldings, very little extension to sprue solidification time was obtained with pressures up to 140 MPa, and this is attributed to the low reciprocating volume flow. For the larger moldings, pressures of 98 MPa were sufficient to produce moldings with neither voids nor cracks, and the sprue solidification time corresponded to the time needed for solidification of the molding. The use of higher pressures resulted in internal residual stresses which were qualitatively detected by the defomation on annealing of polished diametral sections.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , February 1993 , pp. 345 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Zhang, T. and Evans, J.R.G.J. Mater. Res. 8, 187–194 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Zhang, T.Evans, J. R. G. and Dutta, K. K.J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 5, 303–309 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Zhang, T. and Evans, J.R.G.J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 6, 15–21 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Mills, N.J.Plast. Rubb. Proc. Applic. 3, 181–188 (1983).Google Scholar
5Zhang, J. G.Edirisinghe, M. J. and Evans, J. R. G.J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 5, 63–72 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Zhang, J. G.Edirisinghe, M. J. and Evans, J. R. G.J. Mater. Sci. 24, 840–848 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hunt, K.N. and Evans, J.R.G.J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 10, 730–733 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Hunt, K. N.Evans, J. R. G. and Woodthorpe, J.J. Mater. Sci. 26, 292–300 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Allan, P.S. and Bevis, M.J.Compos. Manuf. 1, 79–84 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Zhang, T. and Evans, J.R.G.J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. 7, 155–163 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Zhang, T. and Evans, J.R.G.J. Euro. Ceram. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
12Zhang, T. and Evans, J. R. G.J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
13Allan, P.S. and Bevis, M.J.Plastics and Rubber Processing and Applications 3, 85–91 (1983).Google Scholar
14Zhang, T. and Evans, J. R. G.Ceramics Int. (in press).Google Scholar