Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T13:23:06.916Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thermal endurance evaluation of poly(butylene terephthalate) by conventional and analytical methods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S. Giannoni ,
G. C. Montanari ,
A. Motori  and
A. Saccani
S. Giannoni
Affiliation:
Underwriters Laboratories, Melville, New York 11747–3081
G. C. Montanari
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Elettrica, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
A. Motori
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Chimica Applicata e Scienza dei Materiali, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
A. Saccani
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Chimica Applicata e Scienza dei Materiali, University of Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy
Get access

Abstract

The thermal endurance of poly(butylene terephthalate) was evaluated by both consolidated long-term conventional life tests and a short-term analytical procedure. The latter is based on oxidative stability measurements by isothermal differential calorimetry in a pure oxygen flow. The capability of the analytical technique to provide an activation energy for the thermo-oxidation process was verified. The results obtained by the two methods were compared and discussed. It is shown that the temperature index derived by the analytical procedure can be close to that obtained by the conventional tests, provided that a suitable selection of the test temperatures and failure criteria is made; however, benefits in term of test time shortening are lower than those previously obtained for polyolefin-based materials.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 18 , Issue 6 , June 2003 , pp. 1342 - 1346
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.IEC 216 Standard, Guide for the Determination of Thermal Endurance Properties of Electrical Insulating Materials, (American National Standard Institute, New York, 1990–1994), 4th issue.Google Scholar
2.IEC 1026 Standard, Guidelines for Application of Analytical Test Methods for Thermal Endurance Testing of Electrical Insulating Materials, (American National Standard Institute, New York, 1991), 1st issue.Google Scholar
3.Budrugeac, P. and Segal, E., J. Therm. Anal. 54, 765 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Celina, M. and George, G.A., Polym. Degr. Stab. 50, 89 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Kaneko, T. and Ozawa, T., Trans. Inst. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 97–A, 32 (1977).Google Scholar
6.Mazzanti, G., Montanari, G.C., and Motori, A., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 27, 2601 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Motori, A., Sandrolini, F., and Montanari, G.C., IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 6, 34 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Montanari, G.C. and Motori, A., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24, 1172 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Montanari, G.C. and Motori, A., IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 3, 561 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Bothelo, G., Querios, A., Liberal, S., and Gijsman, P., Polym. Degrad. Stab. 74, 39 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Manabe, M. and Yokota, Y., Polym. Degrad. Stab. 69, 183 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Motori, A., Montanari, G.C., Saccani, A., and Giannoni, S., J. Mater. Res. 15, 243 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Zimmerman, H. and Kim, N.T., Polym. Eng. Sci. 20, 680 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Pilati, F. and Manaresi, P., Polymer 22, 655 (1980).Google Scholar
15.Papet, G., Radiat. Phys. Chem. 29, 65 (1987).Google Scholar
16.Passalacqua, V., Pilati, F., Zamboni, V., Fortunato, B., and Manaresi, P., Polymer 17, 1044 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.McNeill, C. and Bouneckhel, M., Polym. Degrad. Stab. 34, 187 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar