Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T02:25:17.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal stresses in carbon-coated optical fibers at low temperature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Sham-Tsong Shiue
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
Wen-Hao Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, Republic of China
Get access

Abstract

The thermal stresses in carbon-coated optical fibers at low temperature have been analyzed. The thermally induced lateral pressure in the glass fiber would produce microbending loss. In order to minimize such a microbending loss, the thickness, Young's modulus, and Poisson's ratio of the carbon coating should be decreased. On the other hand, the maximum thermal stress is the tangential stress in the carbon coating that occurs at the interface of the carbon coating and glass fiber. It was experimentally observed that if the maximum thermal stress is larger than the tensile strength of the carbon coating, the carbon coating will be broken along the axial direction. In order to minimize such a maximum thermal stress, the thickness of the carbon coating should be increased, but Young's modulus, thermal expansion coefficient, and Poisson's ratio of the carbon coating should be decreased. Finally, an optimal selection of the carbon coating for optical fiber is discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Gloge, D., Bell Syst. Tech. J. 54, 245 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Gardner, W. B., Bell Syst. Tech. J. 54, 457 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Yabuta, T., Yoshizawa, N., and Ishihara, K., Appl. Opt. 22, 2356 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Lenahan, T. A., Bell Syst. Tech. J. 64, 1565 (1985).Google Scholar
5.Suhir, E., IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 8, 863 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Shiue, S. T., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 7695 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Shiue, S. T., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 6384 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lu, K. E., Lee, M. T., Powers, D. R., and Glaesemann, G. S., Tech. Dig. Optical Fiber Commun. Conf., 1988, Paper PD1-1.Google Scholar
9.Huff, R. G., Dimaarchllo, F. V., and Hart, A. C., Tech. Dig. Optical Fiber Commun. Conf., 1988, Paper TUG-2.Google Scholar
10.Yoshizawa, N., Tada, H., and Katsuyama, Y., IEEE J. Lightwave Technol. 9, 417 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Lettington, A. H. and Smith, C., Diamond and Related Materials 1, 805 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jochem, C. M. G., Schaper, H., Swarts, M. J., and Smits, J. W. M., Tech. Dig. Optical Fiber Commun. Conf., 1988, Paper PD8-1.Google Scholar
13.Timoshenko, S. P. and Goodier, J. N., Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970).Google Scholar
14.Bull, S. J. and Chalker, P. R., JOM 47, 16 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar