Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T15:35:23.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Nb content on the strength of Cu–Nb filamentary microcomposites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Sun Ig Hong
Sun Ig Hong
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Chungnam National University, Taedok Science Town, Taejon 305–764, Korea
Get access

Abstract

The yield strength of Cu–Nb filamentary microcomposites was predicted as a function of Nb content by modifying the barrier strengthening model. To predict the variation of the yield strength with Nb content, the interfilamentary spacing was calculated as a function of Nb content on the basis of the assumption that Nb filaments are distributed regularly along the sides of triangular unit cells. The yield stress can be described as the sum of the substructural strengthening component and the filament boundary strengthening term. The good agreement between the prediction and the experimental data suggests that the strength increase in Cu–Nb filamentary microcomposites with increasing Nb content results mostly from increasing the volume fraction of Nb filaments, which act as barriers to plastic flow.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 15 , Issue 9 , September 2000 , pp. 1889 - 1893
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Dew-Hughes, D., Mater. Sci. Eng. 168A, 35 (1993).Google Scholar
2.Gersdorf, R., Roeland, L.W., and Mattens, W.C.M, Physica B 155, 10 (1989).Google Scholar
3.Foner, S., Int. J. Appl. Electromagn. Mater. 1, 111 (1990).Google Scholar
4.Hong, S.I., Hill, M.A., Sakai, Y., Wood, J.T., and Embury, J.D., Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 3313 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sakai, Y. and Schneider-Muntau, H.J., Acta Metall. Mater. 45, 397 (1997).Google Scholar
6.Spitzig, W.A., Scr. Metall. 23, 1177 (1989).Google Scholar
7.Spitzig, W.A. and Krotz, P.D., Acta Metall. 36, 1709 (1988).Google Scholar
8.Verhoeven, J.D., Chumbley, L.S., Laabs, F.C., and Spitzig, W.A., Acta Metall. Mater. 39, 2825 (1991).Google Scholar
9.Funkenbusch, P.D. and Courtney, T.H., Acta Metall. 33, 913 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Courtney, T.H., in Metal Matrix Composites: Processing and Interfaces, edited by Everett, R.K. and Arsenault, R.J. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991), p. 101.Google Scholar
11.Trybus, C.L. and Spitzig, W.A., Acta Metall. 37, 1971 (1989).Google Scholar
12.Spitzig, W.A., Verhoven, J.D., Trybus, C.L., and Chumbley, L.S., Scr. Metall. Mater. 24, 1170 (1990).Google Scholar
13.Spitzig, W.A., Trybus, C.L., and Verhoeven, J.D., in Metal Matrix Composites: Mechanisms and Properties, edited by Everett, R.K. and Arsenault, R.J. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991), p. 151.Google Scholar
14.Funkenbusch, P.D. and Courtney, T.H., Scr. Metall. Mater. 24, 1183 (1990).Google Scholar
15.Bevk, J., Harbison, J.P., and Bell, J.L., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 6031 (1978).Google Scholar
16.Verhoeven, J.D., Dowing, H.L., Chumbly, L.S., and Gibson, E.D., J. Appl. Phys. 65, 1293 (1989).Google Scholar
17.Hangen, U. and Raabe, D., Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 4075 (1995).Google Scholar
18.Hong, S.I. and Hill, M.A., Acta Metall. Mater. 46, 4111 (1998).Google Scholar
19.Hong, S.I. and Hill, M.A., Mater. Sci. Eng. A (1999, in press).Google Scholar
20.Hong, S.I., Scr. Mater. 39, 1685 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Spitzig, W.A., Downing, H.L., Laabs, F.C., Gibson, E.D., and Verhoeven, J.D., Metall. Trans. 24A, 7 (1993).Google Scholar
22.Funkenbusch, P.D., Lee, J.K., and Courtney, T.H., Metall. Trans. 18A, 1249 (1987).Google Scholar
23.Chumbly, L.S., Dowing, H.L., Spitizig, W.A., and Verhoeven, J.D., Mater. Sci. Eng. A117, 59 (1989).Google Scholar
24.Pelton, A.R., Laabs, F.C., Spitzig, W.A., and Cheng, C.C., Ultramicroscopy 22, 251 (1987).Google Scholar
25.Trybus, C.L., Chumbly, L.S., Spitzig, W.A., and Verhoeven, J.D., Ultramicroscopy 22, 315 (1989).Google Scholar
26.Spitizig, W.A., Pelton, A.R., and Laabs, F.C., Acta Metall. 35, 2427 (1987).Google Scholar
27.Hong, S.I. and Hill, M.A., Mater. Sci. Eng. 281A, 189 (2000).Google Scholar
28.Biselli, C. and Morris, D.G., Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 163 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar