Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T09:17:52.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and photoluminescence characterization of ZnSe layers grown on (100)Ge by molecular beam epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R.M. Park
Affiliation:
3M Canada Inc., Corporate Research and Development, 4925 Dufferin Street, Downsview, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T6
H.A. Mar
Affiliation:
3M Canada Inc., Corporate Research and Development, 4925 Dufferin Street, Downsview, Ontario, Canada M3H 5T6
Get access

Abstract

ZnSe layers have been grown on (100)-oriented Ge substrates by molecular beam epitaxy for the first time. The optimum in-situ Ge substrate preparation technique was found to consist of argon-ion sputtering at room temperature followed by annealing at ∼400°C. This cleaning technique provided Ge surfaces which exhibited (2X2) surface reconstruction as observed by reflection high-energy electron diffraction and which had O and C contamination levels below the detection limit of the Auger electron spectroscopy system. ZnSe layers grown on argon-ion sputtered and annealed (100)Ge substrates using a variety of substrate temperatures and Zn to Se beam pressure ratios were characterized by 4.2 K photoluminescence (PL) measurements. The highest quality layers as judged by PL analysis were grown in the substrate temperature range, 310–350°C, with a Zn to Se beam pressure ratio around unity. ZnSe layers grown under these conditions exhibited a dominant donor-bound exciton peak at 2.7976 eV having a minimum linewidth of ∼1.1 meV.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Stutius, W., J. Cryst. Growth 59, 1 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Yao, T., Ogura, M., Matsuoka, S., and Morishita, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 22, L144 (1983).Google Scholar
3Park, R.M., Mar, H. A., and Salansky, N. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 3, 676 (1985).Google Scholar
4Park, R.M. and Mar, H. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 529 (1986).Google Scholar
5Milnes, A. G. and Feucht, D. L., Heterojunction and Metal Semiconductors-Junctions (Academic, New York, 1972).Google Scholar
6Calow, J. T., Owen, S. J. T., and Webb, P. W., Phys. Stat. Sol. 28, 295 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Werthen, J. G., Stutius, W., and Ponce, F. A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 1, 656 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar