Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-30T07:42:08.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Helium nanobubble release from Pd surface: An atomic simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2011

Liang Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Wangyu Hu*
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Huiqiu Deng
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Shifang Xiao
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Jianyu Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Applied Physics, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China
Fei Gao*
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352
Howard L. Heinisch
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352
Shilin Hu
Affiliation:
China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: wangyuhu2001cn@yahoo.com.cn
b)e-mail: fei.gao@pnl.gov
Get access

Abstract

Molecular dynamic simulations of helium atoms escaping from a helium-filled nanobubble near the surface of crystalline palladium reveal unexpected behavior. Significant deformation and cracking near the helium bubble occur initially, and then a channel forms between the bubble and the surface, providing a pathway for helium atoms to propagate toward the surface. The helium atoms erupt from the bubble in an instantaneous and volcano-like process, which leads to surface deformation consisting of cavity formation on the surface, along with modification and atomic rearrangement at the periphery of the cavity. The present simulation results show that, near the palladium surface, there is a helium-bubble-free zone, or denuded zone, with a typical thickness of about 3.0 nm. Combined with experimental measurements and continuum-scale evolutionary model predictions, the present atomic simulations demonstrate that the thickness of the denuded zone, which contains a low concentration of helium atoms, is somewhat larger than the diameter of the helium bubbles in the metal tritide. Furthermore, a relationship between the tensile strength and thickness of metal film is also determined.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Yu, J.N., Zhao, X.J., Zhang, W., Yang, W., and Chu, F.M.: Defect production and accumulation under hydrogen and helium ion irradiation. J. Nucl. Mater. 251, 150 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Yang, L., Zu, X.T., Xiao, H.Y., Gao, F., Heinisch, H.L., Kurtz, R.J., and Liu, K.Z.: Atomistic simulation of helium-defect interaction in alpha-iron. Appl. Phys. Lett . 88, 091915 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Evans, J.H., van Veen, A., and Caspers, L.M.: Formation of helium platelets in Molybdenum. Nature 291, 310 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Johnson, P.B. and Mazey, D.J.: Helium gas bubble lattices in face-centred-cubic metals. Nature 276, 595 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Vassen, R., Trinkaus, H., and Jung, P.: Helium desorption from Fe and V by atomic diffusion and bubble migration. Phys. Rev. B 44, 4206 (1991).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Barnes, R.S.: Embrittlement of stainless steels and nickel-based alloys at high temperature induced by neutron radiation. Nature 206, 1307 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lasser, R.: Tritium and Helium-3 in Metals (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Abell, G.C., Matson, L.K., and Steinmeyer, R.H.: Helium release from aged palladium tritide. Phys. Rev. B 41, 1220 (1990).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9.Porker, D.B. and Williams, J.M.: Low-temperature release of ion-implanted helium from nickel. Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 851 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Mitchell, D.J. and Provo, J.L.: Irregularities in helium release rates from metal ditritides. J. Appl. Phys. 57, 1855 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Snow, C.S. and Brewer, L.N.: Helium release and microstructural changes in Er(D, T)2− x3He x films. J. Nucl. Mater. 374, 147 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Peterson, D.E., Early, J.W., Starzynski, J.S., and Land, C.C.: Helium Release from Radioisotopic Heat Sources, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory Report No. LA-10023 (Los Alamos, NM, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Shanahan, K.L. and Hölder, J.S.: Helium release behavior of aged titanium tritides. J. Alloys Compd. 404406, 365 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Wolfer, W.G.: The pressure for dislocation loop punching by a single bubble. Philos. Mag. A 58, 285 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Wolfer, W.G.: Dislocation loop punching in bubble arrays. Philos. Mag. A 59, 87 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Bowman, R.C. and Attalla, A.: NMR studies of the helium distribution in uranium tritide. Phys. Rev. B 16, 1828 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Camp, W.J.: Helium detrapping and release from metal tritides. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14, 514 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Schober, T., Trinkaus, H., and Lasser, R.A.: A TEM study of the aging of Zr tritides. J. Nucl. Mater. 141143, 453 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Cowgill, D.F.: Helium nano-bubble evolution in aging metal tritides. Fusion Sci. Technol. 48, 539 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Thiébaut, S., Douilly, M., Contreras, S., Limacher, B., Paul-Boncour, V., Décamps, B., and Percheron-Guégan, A.: 3He retention in LaNi5 and Pd tritides: Dependence on stoichiometry, 3He distribution and aging effects. J. Alloys Compd. 446447, 660 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Emig, J.A., Garza, R.G., Christensen, L.D., Coronado, P.R., and Souers, P.C.: Helium release from 19-year-old palladium tritide. J. Nucl. Mater. 187, 209 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Hu, W.Y.: Proceedings of the International Conference on New Frontiers of Process Science and Engineering in Advanced Materials, 14thIKETANI Conference, edited by Naka, M. and Yamane, T. (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan, 2004), p. 7.Google Scholar
23.Xiao, S.F., Hu, W.Y., and Yang, J.Y.: Melting behaviors of nanocrystalline. Ag. J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 20339 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Xiao, S.F. and Hu, W.Y.: Comparative study of microstructural evolution during melting and crystallization. J. Chem. Phys. 125, 014503 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Baskes, M.I. and Melius, C.F.: Pair potentials for fcc metals. Phys. Rev. B 20, 3197 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Johnson, R.A.: Empirical potentials and their use in the calculation of energies of point defects in metals. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 3, 295 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Barber, C.B., Dobkin, D.P., and Huhdanpaa, H.: The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 22, 469 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Selyutin, A.E.: Determination of the ultimate load for breaking membranes. Problemy Prochnosti. 11, 119 (1985).Google Scholar
29.Allen, M.P. and Tidesley, D.J.: Computer Simulation of Liquids (Oxford Science Publications, Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
30.University of Virginia, MSE 524, Modeling in Materials Science. (Leonid Zhigilei, Spring, 2003).Google Scholar
31.Černý, M. and Pokluda, J.: Influence of superimposed biaxial stress on the tensile strength of perfect crystals from first principles. Phys. Rev. B 76, 024115 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar