Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:17:14.079Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Joining of Alumina Ceramics Using Nanocrystalline Tape Cast Interlayer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

R. Chaim  and
B. G. Ravi
R. Chaim
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
B. G. Ravi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Nanocrystalline transition alumina tape casts were used as interlayers to join conventional alumina ceramic pellets. The joining experiments were performed by hot pressing at 1200–1300 °C under uniaxial pressures of 55 and 80 MPa for 1- and 5-h durations, with and without a nanocrystalline interlayer. Successful joints were enabled only above 1250 °C in the presence of the interlayer. Generally, the joint 4-point bending strength increased with the increase in joining temperature, pressure, and duration. The average bending strength of the interface joined at 1250 °C was 245 ± 65 MPa compared to the pellet strength of 268 MPa. Postjoining heat treatments at 1400 °C for 3 h caused reduction in the joint strength. The interlayer at the joint exhibited homogeneous and crack-free microstructure. The changes in the joint strength were discussed with respect to the densification and grain growth behavior of the nanocrystalline interlayer.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 15 , Issue 8 , August 2000 , pp. 1724 - 1728
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Meek, T.T. and Blake, R.D., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 5, 270 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Fukushima, H., Yamanaka, T., and Matsui, M., J. Mater. Res. 5, 397 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Binner, J.G.P, Fernie, J.A., Whitaker, P.A., and Cross, T.E., J. Mater. Sci. 33, 3017 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Nagano, T. and Wakai, F., J. Mater. Sci. 28, 5793 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Motohashi, Y., Sakuma, T., and Chou, C.C., in THERMEC'97, Proceedings of the International Conference on Thermomechanical Processing of Steels and Other Materials, Wollongong, Australia, July 7–11, 1997, edited by Chandra, T. and Sakai, T. (Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, 1997), p. 1999.Google Scholar
6.Cross, T.H. and Mayo, M.J., Nanostruct. Mater. 3, 163 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Ferkal, H. and Riehemann, W., Nanostruct. Mater. 7, 835 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Hellmig, R.J., Castagnet, J-F., and Ferkel, H., Nanostruct. Mater. 12, 1041 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Rijnders, M.R. and Peteves, S.D., Scripta Mater. 41, 1137 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Handwerker, C.A., Morris, P.A., and Coble, R.L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72, 130 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Handwerker, C.A., Dynys, J.M., Cannon, R.M., and Coble, R.L., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1371 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Venkatachari, K.R. and Raj, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 69, 135 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Ye, J. and Dominguez-Rodriguez, A., Scripta Metall. Mater. 33, 441 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Dominguez-Rodriguez, A., Jimenez-Pique, E., and Jimenez-Melendo, M., Scripta Mater. 39, 21 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Dominguez-Rodriguez, A., Guiberteau, F., and Jimenez-Melendo, M., J. Mater. Res. 13, 1631 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Uematsu, K., Itakura, K., Uchida, N., Saito, K., Miyamoto, A., and Miyashita, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 74 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Liao, S-C., Chen, Y-J., Kear, B.H. and Mayo, W.E., Nanostruct. Mater. 10, 1063 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar