Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T16:53:21.645Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnesium nanocomposite: Effect of melt dispersion of different oxides nano particles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2016

Syed Fida Hassan ,
Syed Zabiullah ,
Nasser Al-Aqeeli  and
Manoj Gupta
Syed Fida Hassan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Syed Zabiullah
Affiliation:
Saudi Steel Pipe, Dammam 31463, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Nasser Al-Aqeeli
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran 31261, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Manoj Gupta
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore117576
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: sfhassan@kfupm.edu.sa or itsforfida@gmail.com
Get access

Abstract

Magnesium based nanocomposites containing 0.66 vol% of different types of oxide (i.e., Al2O3, Y2O3, and ZrO2) nano particles. The nano oxide particles were dispersed using melt processing. Microstructural characterization reveled that Y2O3 and ZrO2 nano particles were relatively better magnesium matrix grain refiner compared to nano-size Al2O3 particles. Mechanical characterization revealed that the oxides used in this study as reinforcement have strong strengthening effect on the magnesium matrix, where Y2O3 particles were most effective and Al2O3 particles were least effective. Ductility and resistance to fracture of magnesium was significantly improved by Al2O3 nano particles, unaffected by Y2O3 nano particles, and adversely affected by ZrO2 nano particles.

Keywords

nano-particulatesmagnesiummechanical propertiesmicrostructureductility
Type
Review
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 31 , Issue 1: Annual Issue: Early Career Scholars in Materials Science , 14 January 2016 , pp. 100 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kainer, K.U. and Von Buch, F.: The current state of technology and potential for further development of magnesium applications. In Magnesium—Alloys and Technology, Kainer, K.U., ed. (Wiley-Vch Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA: Weinheim Germany, 2003); pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Ostrovsky, I. and Henn, Y.: Present state and future of magnesium application in aerospace industry. Presented at the International Conference “New Challenges in Aeronautics” ASTEC'07, Moscow, 2007.Google Scholar
Witte, F.: The history of biodegradable magnesium implants: A review. Acta Biomater. 6, 1680–1692 (2010).Google Scholar
Callister, W.D.: Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction (John-Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 2007).Google Scholar
Lloyd, D.J.: Particle reinforced aluminum and magnesium matrix composites. Int. Mater. Rev. 39(1), 1–23 (1994).Google Scholar
Ferkel, H. and Mordike, B.L.: Magnesium strengthened by SiC nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 298, 193–199 (2001).Google Scholar
Unverricht, R., Peitz, V., Riehemann, W., and Ferkel, H.: Dispersion-strengthening of magnesium by nanoscaled ceramic powder. In Proceeding of Conference on Magnesium Alloys and Their Applications (KU Kainer: Weinheim, Germany, 1998); pp. 327–332.Google Scholar
Hassan, S.F. and Gupta, M.: Effect of type of primary processing on the microstructure, CTE and mechanical properties of magnesium/alumina nanocomposites. Compos. Struct. 72(1), 19–26 (2006).Google Scholar
Hassan, S.F.: Effect of primary processing techniques on the microstructure and mechanical properties of nano-Y2O3 reinforced magnesium nanocomposites. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 528(16–17), 5484–5490 (2011).Google Scholar
Hassan, S.F. and Gupta, M.: Effect of different types of nano-size oxide particulates on microstructural and mechanical properties of elemental Mg. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 2229–2236 (2006).Google Scholar
Ansell, G.S.: Mechanical properties of two-phase alloys. In Physical Metallurgy, Cahn, R.W. ed. (North-Holland Publishing Company: Netherlands, 1970); p. 1083.Google Scholar
Singh, A., Nakamura, M., Watanabe, M., Kato, A., and Tsai, A.P.: Quasicrystal strengthened Mg–Zn–Y alloys by extrusion. Scr. Mater. 49, 417 (2003).Google Scholar
Yang, W. and Lee, W.B.: Mesoplasticity and its Applications (Materials Research and Engineering, Springer-Verlag, Berlin: Germany, 1993); p. 361.Google Scholar
Eustathopoulos, N., Nicholas, M.G., and Drevet, B.: Wettability at High Temperatures, Vol. 3 (Pregamon Materials Series, Elsevier: UK, 1999); p. 198.Google Scholar
ASM International Handbook Committee: ASM Handbook Volume 2: Properties and Selection: Non-Ferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials (ASM International, Ohio, USA, 1990); p. 1134.Google Scholar
Tan, M.J. and Zhang, X.: Powder metal matrix composites: Selection and processing. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 244, 80–85 (1998).Google Scholar
Lee, Y.C., Dahle, A.K., and StJohn, D.H.: The role of solute in grain refinement of magnesium. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 31, 2895–2906 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, J.D.: Extraction Metallurgy, 3rd ed. (Pergamon Press: Great Britain, 1989); p. 148.Google Scholar
Naser, J., Riehemann, W., and Ferkel, H.: Dispersion hardening of metals by nanoscaled ceramic powders. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 234–236, 467 (1997).Google Scholar
Dai, L.H., Ling, Z., and Bai, Y.L.: Size-dependent inelastic behavior of particle-reinforced metal-matrix composite. Compos. Sci. Technol. 61, 1057–1063 (2001).Google Scholar
Clyne, T.W. and Withers, P.J.: An Introduction to Metal Matrix Composites (Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 1993).Google Scholar
Website: http://www.ceramics.nist.gov/srd/summary/Y2O3.htm (last assessed May, 2015).Google Scholar
Morrell, R.: Handbook of Properties of Technical & Engineering Ceramics (HMSO, London, 1985).Google Scholar
Smithells, C.J.: Metals Reference Book, 7th ed., (Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd: London, 1992); pp. 14:2, 14:19, 15:3, and 22:71.Google Scholar
Fleck, N.A., Muller, G.M., Ashby, M.F., and Hutchinson, J.W.: Strain gradient plasticity: Theory and experiment. Acta Metall. Mater. 42, 475–487 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chawla, N. and Chawla, K.K.: Metal Matrix Composites (Springer Science + Business Media Inc., New York, 2006).Google Scholar
Goh, C.S., Wei, J., Lee, L.C., and Gupta, M.: Ductility improvement and fatigue studies in Mg-CNT nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 1432 (2008).Google Scholar
Raynor, G.V.: The Physical Metallurgy of Magnesium and its Alloys (Pergamon Press Ltd., Britain, 1959).Google Scholar