Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T03:41:40.515Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Titania and silica powders produced in a counterflow diffusion flame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Aaron J. Rulison ,
Philippe F. Miquel  and
Joseph L. Katz
Aaron J. Rulison
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Philippe F. Miquel
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Joseph L. Katz*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
*
c) Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Earlier publications describe the counterflow diffusion flame burner and its unique capability to produce oxide particles having certain structures, such as spheres of one material coated with another, spheres of one composition with attached bulbs of another composition, and uniform multicomponent mixtures. Here we describe the production and properties of bulk quantities of powders produced using this burner. Measurements were made of specific surface area and, for titania, of phase composition. It was found that the controls over powder characteristics used in other forms of flame-synthesis are equally effective in the counterflow diffusion flame burner. We found that the specific surface area of both silica and titania powders decrease with increasing precursor concentrations. Transmission electron microscopy analysis of the titania powders indicates that the mean size of the particles that comprise these powders increases with increasing concentration. These trends are consistent with the collision-coalescence theory of particle growth. In addition, the crystalline phase of titania can be controlled by selecting the appropriate feed stream. For example, over the ranges TiCl4 precursor concentrations tested, feeding it only into the oxidizer stream yields mainly anatase TiO2 powders, while feeding only into the fuel stream yields mainly rutile TiO2 powders. These trends can be explained by the known atmosphere-dependent anatase-rutile transformation. The present data demonstrate that, in addition to its unique capability to produce certain particle shapes and morphologies, the counterflow diffusion flame burner can be manipulated to produce either of the major commercial titania phases, and also silica, with a wide range of specific surface areas.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 11 , Issue 12 , December 1996 , pp. 3083 - 3089
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

References

REFERENCES

1.Braun, J. H., Baidins, A., and Marganski, R. E., Prog. Org. Coat. 20, 105 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bond, G. C. and Tahir, S. F., Appl. Catal. 71, 1 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Hung, C-H. and Katz, J. L., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1861 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hung, C-H., Miquel, P. F., and Katz, J.L., J. Mater. Res. 7, 1870 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Katz, J. L. and Miquel, P. F., Nanostructured Mater. 4, 551 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Miquel, P. F., Hung, C-H., and Katz, J.L., J. Mater. Res. 8, 2404 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Miquel, P. F. and Katz, J. L., J. Mater. Res. 9, 746 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Zachariah, M. R., Chin, D., Semerjian, H. G., and Katz, J. L., Appl. Opt. 28, 530 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Zachariah, M. R. and Joklik, R. G., J. Appl. Phys. 68, 321 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Zachariah, M. R., Chemistry of silane oxidation and pyrolysis during particle formation: Comparison with in situ measurements, Proceedings of the Western States Section of the Combustion Institute, March 1991 Meeting.Google Scholar
11.Chung, S. L. and Katz, J. L., Combustion and Flame 61, 271 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Katz, J. L. and Hung, C. H., U.S. Patent 5 268 337.Google Scholar
13.Gomez, A. and Rosner, D. E., Combustion Sci. Technol. 89, 335 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Miquel, P. F., Flame Synthesis of Nanostructured Mixed Oxides and Its Application to the Formation of Catalysts, Ph.D. Thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (1995).Google Scholar
15.Formenti, M., Juillet, F., Meriaudeau, P., Teichner, S.J., and Vergnon, P., in Aerosols and Atmospheric Chemistry, edited by Hidy, G. M. (Academic Press, New York, 1972), p. 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.George, A. P., Murley, R. D., and Place, E. R., in Fogs and Smokes, Symposium of the Faraday Society (Chemical Society, London, 1973), p. 63.Google Scholar
17.Ulrich, G. D., Comb. Sci. Tech. 4, 47–57 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Shannon, R. D. and Pask, J. A., Am. Minerol. 49, 1707 (1964).Google Scholar
19.Hishita, S., Mutoh, I., Koumota, K., and Yanagida, H., Ceram. Int. 9, 61 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Mackenzie, K.J.D. and Melling, P.J., Trans. J. Brit. Ceram. Soc. 73, 23 (1974).Google Scholar
21.Kobata, A., Kusakabe, K., and Morooka, S., AIChE J. 37, 347 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Akhtar, M. K., Xiong, Y., and Pratsinis, S.E., AIChE J. 37, 1561 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Kumar, K. P., Zaspalis, V. T., DeMul, F.F.M., Keizer, K., and Burggraff, A. J., in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry V, edited by Hampden-Smith, M. J., Klemperer, W. G., and Brinker, C. J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 271, Pittsburgh, PA, 1992), pp. 499–504.Google Scholar
24.Iida, Y. and Ozaki, S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 44, 120 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Shannon, R. D. and Pask, J. A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 48, 391 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar