No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Dynamic Interpretation for Impulsive Deflection Test on Flexible Pavements
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2011
Abstract
In this study, a computer program DBFWD is developed for data analysis of Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) test on flexible pavements. To backcalculate the layer moduli of the pavement, a number of iterative backcalculation schemes were employed with the forward analysis of the Green's flexibility influence functions. The temperature and the moisture influences on material moduli of the asphalt surface and the subgrade soils were considered in the analysis. As the result, the iterative scheme based on the peak deflection ratios was selected to backcalculate the layer moduli of local pavements. Owing to the correction procedure used in the program, interpretations with four original deflections were found more accurate than those with equivalent number of modified deflections. Comparisons of program DBFWD with other static backcalculation programs on theoretical and experimental deflections indicated that dynamic interpretation is more effective in providing the layer modulus information. Despite of the requirements of accurate inputs of the layer thickness and the testing load for the analysis, a generalized application of the program needs to be clarified with model road test in demand.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 1998
References
REFERENCES
1.Monismith, C. L., “Analytically Based Asphalt Pavement Design and Rehabilitation: Theory to Practice, 1962–1992,” TRR, 1354, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 5–26 (1992).Google Scholar
2.Ullidtz, P. and Coetzee, N. F., “Analytical Procedure in Nondestructive Testing Pavement Evaluation,” TRR, 1482, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 61–66 (1995).Google Scholar
3.Roesset, J. M. and Shao, K. Y., “Dynamic Interpretation of Dynaflect and Falling Weight Deflectometer Tests,” TRR, 1022, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 7–16 (1985).Google Scholar
4.Sebaaly, B. E., Mamlouk, M. S. and Davies, T. G., “Dynamic Analysis of Falling Weight Deflectometer Data,” TRR, 1070, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 63–68 (1986).Google Scholar
5.Anderson, M. and Drnevich, V. P., “A True Dynamic Method for Nondestructive Testing of Rigid Pavements with Overlays,” Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. on Concrete Pavement Design and Rehabilitation, pp. 361–374 (1989).Google Scholar
6.Haskell, N. A., “The Dispersion of Surface Waves in Multilayered Media,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 17–34(1953).Google Scholar
7.Thomson, W. T., “Transmission of Elastic Waves through a Stratified Solid Medium,” Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 21, Feb., pp. 89–93 (1950).Google Scholar
8.Kausel, E and Roesset, J. M., “Stiffness Matrices for Layered Soils,” Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, Vol. 71, No. 6, pp. 1743–1761 (1981).Google Scholar
9.Kausel, E., “An Explicit Solution for the Green Functions for Dynamic Loads in Layered Media,” Research Report S81–13, Department of Civil Engineering, M.I.T. (1981).Google Scholar
10.Kang, Y. V., Roesset, J. M. and Stokoe, II, K. H., “Effects of Loading Position on Deflection Basins Obtained with Dynaflect and FWD Test,” 70th TRB Annual Meeting, National Research Council, Washington (1991).Google Scholar
11.Chang, D. W., Kang, V. Y.Roesset, J. M. and Stokoe, II, K. H., “Effects of Depth to Bedrock on Deflection Basins Obtained with Dynaflect and FWD Test,” TRR, 1355, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 8–16. (1992).Google Scholar
12.Magnuson, A. H., Lytton, R. L. and Briggs, R. C, “Comparison of Computer Predictions and Field Data for Analysis of Falling Weight Deflectometer Data,” TRR, 1293, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 61–71 (1991).Google Scholar
13.Chou, Y. T., “An Iterative Layered Elastic Computer Program for Rational Pavement Design,” Report FAA–RD–75–226, U.S. DOT (1976).Google Scholar
14.Wang, M. C, “Evaluation of In Situ Elastic Moduli from Road Rater Deflection Basin,” TRR, 810, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 54–57 (1981).Google Scholar
15.Uzan, J., Lytton, R. L. and Germahn, F. P., “General Procedure for backcalculating layer moduli,” Nondestructive Testing of Pavements and Backcalculation of Moduli, ASTM, STP 1026, pp. 217–228 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Wu, H. L., “Introduction of the AASHTO 1993 Thickness Design Method for Flexible Pavement (I) & (II),” Taiwan Highway Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1 and 2 (1994).Google Scholar
17.Chang, D. W., Chang, H. Y. and Chang, C. L, “Development of Dynamic Backcalculation Program UTAM for Steady–State Deflection Test,” J. of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 105–118 (1997).Google Scholar
18.Chang, D. W., Roesset, J. M. and Stokoe, II, K. H., “Nonlinear Effects in Falling Weight Deflectometer Test,” TRR, 1355, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 1–7 (1992).Google Scholar
19.Hall, J. W. Jr. and Alexander, D. R., “Comparative Study of Nondestructive Pavement Testing, WES NDT Methodologies,” Miscellaneous Paper GL–85– 26, USACE Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS, USA (1985).Google Scholar
20.Uzan, J., Computer Program MODULUS, Appendix E, NCHRP Project 10–27, Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University, Texas, USA, pp. E1–E22 (1986).Google Scholar
21.Chang, C. L., “Dynamic Interpretation for Impulsive Deflection Testing,” M. S. Thesis, Tamkang University, Taiwan, R.O.C. (1996).Google Scholar
22.Bush, A. J. III, and Alexander, D. R., “Pavement Evaluation Using Deflection Basin Measurements and Layered Theory,” TRR, 1022, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp. 16–29 (1985).Google Scholar
23.AASHTO, AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (1986).Google Scholar