Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-vt8vv Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-08-10T05:23:24.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Using the Flow Separator Blade to Increase the Uniformity of Flow in the Intake Manifold

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2019

M. Nazemi Babadi  and
S. Kheradmand
M. Nazemi Babadi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Malek-Ashtar University of Technology Shahin-Shahr, Isfahan, Iran
S. Kheradmand*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Malek-Ashtar University of Technology Shahin-Shahr, Isfahan, Iran
*
*Corresponding author (kheradmand@mut-es.ac.ir)
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, an idea to make the flow uniform inside the manifolds of four and six cylinder engines without changing their main geometries is presented. In general the uniform distribution of air flow among the engine cylinders is very important. Non-uniform flow in the intake manifold outlets causes inadequate feeding of the cylinders, inappropriate combustion and reduces engine volumetric efficiency. So this matter is vital for improving engine performance. A flow guide blade is added into the manifold and uniformity of the air flow is studied in different regime using transient numerical simulations. The amount of air exited from each outlet and the effect of this blade on flow uniformity is investigated. The results showed that the blade has made the flow more uniform in the manifold outlets and it was also found that in the four-cylinder and six-cylinder engines the flow uniformity is increased by 67% and 75%, respectively. In other words, as the number of engine cylinders increase, the effect of using this blade increases.

Keywords

Air flowflow separator bladeintake manifolduniform distribution
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 35 , Issue 6 , December 2019 , pp. 875 - 885
Copyright
© The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Costa, R. C., Hanriot, S. D. M. and Sodré, J. R., “Influence of intake pipe length and diameter on the performance of a spark ignition engine,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 36, pp. 29–35 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenhammer, D., Baum, E., Peterson, B., Böhm, B., Jung, B. and Grundmann, S., “Volumetric intake flow measurements of an IC engine using magnetic resonance velocimetry,” Experiments in Fluids, 55, p. 1724 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. H., Wang, C. H. and Kim, S., “A manifold design problem for a plate-fin microdevice to maximize the flow uniformity of system,” International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 95, pp. 22–34 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onorati, A., Montenegro, G., Errico, G. D. and Piscaglia, F., “Integrated 1D-3D fluid dynamic simulation of a turbocharged diesel engine with complete intake and exhaust systems,” SAE Technical Paper, 2010-01-1194, (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vashahi, F., Choi, Y., Ra, S.. and Lee, J. K., “Influence of Design Parameters on the Air/Liquid Ratio of an Air Induction Nozzle,” Journal of Mechanics, 34, pp. 375–385 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuel, J., NS, P. and Annamalai, K., “Effect of Variable Length Intake Manifold on a Turbocharged Multi-Cylinder Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper, 2013-01-2756, (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
William, J., Dupont, A., Bazile, R. and Marchal, M., “Study of geometrical parameter influence on air/EGR mixing,” SAE Technical Paper, 2003-01-1796 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, B. and Ganesan, V., “Flow field development in a direct injection diesel engine with different manifolds,” International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, 2, pp. 80–91 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaughan, A. and Delagrammatikas, G. J, “Variable Runner Length Intake Manifold Design: An Interim Progress Report,” SAE Technical Paper, 2010-01-1112, (2010).Google Scholar
da Silva Trindade, W. “Use of 1D-3D Coupled Simulation to Develop an Intake Manifold System,” SAE Technical Paper, 2010-01-1534, (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saravanan, D., Gokhale, A. and Karthikeyan, N., “Design and Development of a Flow Based Dual Intake Manifold System,” SAE Technical Paper, 2014-01-2880, (2014).Google Scholar
Zhang, T. et al., “Research in the Effects of Intake Manifold Length and Chamber Shape on Performance for an Atkinson Cycle Engine,” SAE Technical Paper, 2016-01-1086, (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, J., “Flow analysis of engine intake manifold based on computational fluid dynamics,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 916, p. 012043 (2017).Google Scholar
Yang, H., Wang, Y., Ren, M. and Yang, X., “Effect of the rectangular exit-port geometry of a distribution manifold on the flow performance,” Applied Thermal Engineering, 117, pp. 481–486 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannakopoulos, G. K., Frouzakis, C. E., Boulouchos, K., Fischer, P. F. and Tomboulides, A. G., “Direct numerical simulation of the flow in the intake pipe of an internal combustion engine,” International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 68, pp. 257–268 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manmadhachary, A., Santosh Kumar, M. and Ravi Kumar, Y., “Design&manufacturing of spiral intake manifold to improve Volument efficiency of injection diesel engine byAM process,” Materials Today: Proceedings, 4, pp. 1084–1090 (2017).Google Scholar
Jemni, M. A., Kantchev, v, Abid, M. S., “Influence of intake manifold design on in-cylinder flow and engine performances in a bus diesel engine converted to LPG gas fuelled, using CFD analyses and experimental investigations,” Energy, 36, pp. 2701–2715 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., “Theory of flow distribution in manifolds,” Chemical engineering journal, 168, pp. 1331–1345 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, G. et al., “Design of a 4-cylinder gasoline turbo engine intake manifold,” Proceedings of the ASME 2016 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 9, pp. 1–6 (2016).Google Scholar
Poroseva, S. V., Bézard, H., “On ability of standard k-3 model to simulate aerodynamic turbulent flows,” CFD Journal, 9, pp. 464–470 (2001).Google Scholar
Sakowitz, A., Mihaescu, M. and Fuchs, L., “Flow decomposition methods applied to the flow in an IC engine manifold,” Applied Thermal Engineering, 65, pp. 57–65 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonomura, O., Tanaka, S., Noda, M., Kano, M., Hasebe, S. and Hashimoto, I., “CFD-based optimal design of manifold in plate-fin microdevices,” Chemical Engineering Journal, 101, pp. 397–402, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceviz, M. A. and Akin, M., “Design of a new SI engine intake manifold with variable length plenum,” Energy Conversion and Management, 51, pp. 2239–2244 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pogorevc, P. and Kegl, B., “Intake system design procedure for engines with special requirements,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 220, pp. 241–252 (2006).Google Scholar