Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-04T19:14:29.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Huntington's Chorea—Some Biochemical and Therapeutic Aspects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. Oliphant
Affiliation:
Royal Edinburgh Hospital
J. I. Evans
Affiliation:
Royal Edinburgh Hospital
A. D. Forrest
Affiliation:
Royal Edinburgh Hospital

Extract

Huntington's Chorea presents us with a good “model” of brain disease in that we know the extent of the contribution of heredity, in contrast to a condition such as schizophrenia regarding which many authors (cf. Alanen, 1958) would be prepared to defend the concept of pseudo-heredity. Secondly the disease carries a fairly uniform prognosis, and finally it results in a distinctive disturbance of motor function which permits of some accuracy in diagnosis and some criterion for objective measurement.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alanen, Y. O., Acta Psych. et Neurol. Scand., 1958, 124, 33.Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. D., and Robinson, K. S., Arch. Biochem., 1954, 52, 287.Google Scholar
Bodi, T., Share, I., Levy, H., and Moyer, J. H., Antibiotic. Med. and Clin. Ther., 1959, 6, 79.Google Scholar
Bradley, P. B., and Elkes, J., 2nd International Neurochemical Symposium: The Metabolism of the Nervous System, 1956, 515522. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Brodie, B. B., Shore, P. A., and Pletscher, A., Science, 1956, 123, 992.Google Scholar
Brothers, C. R., and Meadows, A. W., J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 548.Google Scholar
Buscaino, G. A., Personal communication, 1958.Google Scholar
Cafruny, E. J., and Domino, E. F., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1958, 79, 336.Google Scholar
Demyer, W., and Dykes, M., Amer. J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 228, 70.Google Scholar
Forrest, A. D., J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 507.Google Scholar
Ganguli, L. K., J. Ind. M. Ass., 1956, 26, 274.Google Scholar
Goldman, D., Amer. J. Med. Sci., 1952, 224, 573.Google Scholar
Gross, C. G., and Weiskrantz, L., Proc. B.P.S. Ann. Conference, 1959, 1959, p. 13a.Google Scholar
Jepson, J. B., Lancet, 1955, ii, 1009.Google Scholar
Lazarte, J. A., Baars, C. W., and Pearson, J. S., Amer. J. Med. Sci., 1955a, 229, 676.Google Scholar
Idem , Peterson, M. C., Baars, C. W., and Pearson, J. S., Proc. Mayo Clin., 1955b, 30, 358.Google Scholar
Leyton, G. B., Brit. Med. J., 1958, ii, 1136.Google Scholar
Luby, E. L., Cohen, B. D., Rosenbaum, G., Gottlieb, J. S., and Kelley, R., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1959, 81, 363.Google Scholar
Merskey, H., J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 411.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. M., and Butt, E. M., Bull. Los Angeles Neur. Soc., 1955, 20, 38.Google Scholar
Pare, C. M. B., Sandler, M., and Stacey, R. S., Lancet, 1957, i, 551.Google Scholar
Pleydell, M. J., Brit. Med. J., 1954, i, 1121.Google Scholar
Reed, S., and Palm, J., Science, 1951, 113, 294.Google Scholar
Reed, T. E., and Chandler, J. H., Amer. J. Human Genet., 1958, 10, 201.Google Scholar
Riegelhaupt, L. M., J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1958, 127, 228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodnight, R., and Aves, E. K., J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 1149.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.