Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T04:32:49.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metabolic Response to Electrical Stimulation in Separated Portions of Human Cerebral Tissues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

H. McIlwain ,
P. J. W. Ayres  and
Olga Forda
H. McIlwain
Affiliation:
Biochemical Laboratories, Institute of Psychiatry (British Postgraduate Medical Federation, University of London), Maudsley Hospital, S.E.5
P. J. W. Ayres
Affiliation:
Biochemical Laboratories, Institute of Psychiatry (British Postgraduate Medical Federation, University of London), Maudsley Hospital, S.E.5
Olga Forda
Affiliation:
Biochemical Laboratories, Institute of Psychiatry (British Postgraduate Medical Federation, University of London), Maudsley Hospital, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Electrical stimulation of different areas of the human brain has hitherto been confined to experiments with the brain in situ, in living subjects. It has been carried out while the brain received its blood supply from normal sources. By chemical analysis of the arterial and venous blood and measurement of its rate of flow, information has been obtained on how metabolic changes in the brain vary with changes in its activity. However, these conditions can give information only about gross biochemical changes associated with stimulation; they are cumbersome, and would not indicate abnormal reactions in small areas. Also, they detect differences only in substances which are actively exchanged with the blood stream.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 98 , Issue 411 , April 1952 , pp. 265 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1952 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barker, S. B., and Summerson, W. H., J. Biol. Chem., 1941, 138, 535.Google Scholar
Burns, B. D., J. Physiol., 1950, 111, 50.Google Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1951, 112, 156.Google Scholar
Chang, H-T., J. Neurophysiol., 1951, 14, 95.Google Scholar
Elliott, K. A. C., and Penfield, W., ibid., 1948, 11, 485.Google Scholar
Gore, M. B. R., 1952, unpublished.Google Scholar
Krebs, H. A., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1950, 4, 249.Google Scholar
McCulloch, W. S., Klein, J. R., and Goodwin, C., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 1945, 58, 292.Google Scholar
McIlwain, H., Biochem. J., 1951a, 49, 382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem, ibid., 1951b, 50, 132.Google Scholar
Idem, Brit. J. Pharmacol., 1951c, 6, 531.Google Scholar
Idem, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 674.Google Scholar
Idem, Anguiano, G., and Cheshire, J. D., Biochem. J., 1951, 50, 12.Google Scholar
Idem, and Gore, M. B. R., ibid., 1951, 50, 24.Google Scholar
Idem, and Grinyer, I., ibid., 1950, 46, 620.Google Scholar
Serota, H. M., and Gerard, R. W., J. Neurophysiol., 1938, 1, 115.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.