Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wbk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T15:38:37.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prognostic Factors in the Electro-Shock Treatment of Depressive States

II.—The Application of Specific Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Julian M. Roberts
Julian M. Roberts*
Affiliation:
University of Leeds and the United Leeds Hospitals
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the past ten years varying degrees of prognostic value have been claimed, directly or indirectly, for a number of specific factors in connection with the treatment of depressive illnesses by E.C.T. These have included the blood pressure responses to adrenaline and methacholine (Funkenstein et al., 1948, 1950); the “sedation threshold” to intravenous sodium amylobarbitone (Shagass, 1954; Shagass and Jones, 1958); EEG changes under thiopentone following electroshock (Roth, 1951; Roth et al., 1957); and psychological tests based on items derived from the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Pearson, 1950; Feldman, 1957, 1958; Welsh, 1952). Other studies have been made on the prognostic value of adrenocortical activity (Faure et al., 1957); serum calcium levels (Gour and Chaudhry, 1957); the “amytal test” (Kahn et al., 1956); and the administration of methylamphetamine (“methedrine”) (Rudolf, 1956). Some of the techniques employed appear too complicated or unreliable in their interpretation to be of any practical clinical value, although a few are of great theoretical value in the contributions to further knowledge of the rationale of E.C.T.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 105 , Issue 440 , July 1959 , pp. 703 - 713
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackner, B., and Pampiglione, G., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1958, 51, 76.Google Scholar
Alexander, L., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1955, 73, 496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumberg, A. G., Cohen, L., and Miller, J. S. A., J. Hillside Hosp., 1956, 5, 3.Google Scholar
Brothers, A. U., and Bennett, A. E., Dis. Nerv. Syst., 1954, 15, 335.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 28.Google Scholar
Faure, H., et al., Presse Med., 1957, 65, 65.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. J., Psychol. Monogr., 1957, 65, No. 10.Google Scholar
Idem , J. Clin. Psychol., 1958, 14, 41.Google Scholar
Funkenstein, D. H., Greenblatt, M., and Solomon, H. C., J. Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1948, 108, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Assn. for Res. in Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1950, XXXI, 245.Google Scholar
Idem , Psychosom. Med., 1952, 14, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gellhorn, E., Physiological Foundations of Neurology and Psychiatry, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geocaris, K. H., and Kooiker, J. E., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1956, 112, 808.Google Scholar
Gour, K. N., and Chaudhry, H. M., J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 275.Google Scholar
Kahn, R. L., Fink, M., and Weinstein, E. A., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1956, 76, 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, J., Rinkel, M., and Greenblatt, M., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1948, 105, 429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liddell, D. W., and Weil-Malherbe, H., J. Neurol., 1953, 16, 7.Google Scholar
Maas, J. W., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1958, 79, 585.Google Scholar
Montagu, J. D., and Davies, L. S., J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 577.Google Scholar
Nelson, R., and Gellhorn, E., Psychosom. Med., 1957, 19, 486.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. S., J. Clin. Psychol., 1950, 6, 285.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pumroy, D. K., and Kogan, W. S., J. Clin. Psychol., 1958, 14, 44.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. M., 1959. In press.Google Scholar
Roth, M., E.E.G. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1951, 3, 261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Kay, D. W. K., Shaw, J., and Green, J., ibid., 1957, 9, 225.Google Scholar
Rothballer, A. B., ibid., 1957, 9, 409.Google Scholar
Rudolf, G., J. Ment. Sci., 1949, 95, 920.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1956, 102, 358.Google Scholar
Shagass, C., E.E.G. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1954, 6, 221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , and Naiman, J., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1955, 74, 397.Google Scholar
Idem , J. Psychosom. Res., 1956, 1, 49.Google Scholar
Idem , Psychosom. Med., 1956, 18, 410.Google Scholar
Idem , Naiman, J., and Mihalik, J., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1956, 75, 461.Google Scholar
Idem , Mihalik, J., and Jones, A. L., J. Psychosom. Res., 1957, 2, 45.Google Scholar
Idem , E.E.G. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1957, 9, 101.Google Scholar
Idem , and Jones, A. L., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1958, 114, 1002.Google Scholar
Simon, S. L., and Taube, H., J. Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1946, 104, 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sloane, R. B., and Lewis, D. J., J. Psychosom. Res., 1956, 1, 273.Google Scholar
Iidem , and Slater, P., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1957a, 77, 540.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1957b, 78, 294.Google Scholar
Stemmermann, M. G., and Owen, T. V., J. Clin. and Exper. Psychopath., 1957, 18, 236.Google Scholar
Thorpe, J. G., and Barker, J. C., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1957, 78, 194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welsh, G. S., J. Consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 65.Google Scholar
Windle, C., Psychol. Bull., 1952, 49, 452.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.