Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-29T15:20:09.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Failure to launch? The lack of populist attitudinal activation in the 2019 South African elections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2023

Robert Nyenhuis Open the ORCID record for Robert Nyenhuis [Opens in a new window]  and
Collette Schulz-Herzenberg Open the ORCID record for Collette Schulz-Herzenberg [Opens in a new window]
Robert Nyenhuis*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, California State University, 3801 W. Temple Avenue, Building 94, Room 303, Pomona, CA 91768-4055, Pomona, USA
Collette Schulz-Herzenberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, University of Stellenbosch, 6th Floor, Arts Building, Cnr. Merriman Ave. and Ryneveld St., Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa
*
Corresponding author: Robert Nyenhuis. Email: renyenhuis@cpp.edu
Email: csh@sun.ac.za
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do South Africans hold strong populist attitudes? If so, who is the ‘populist citizen’ and have these attitudes been activated in the electoral arena? In this article, we make use of 2019 Comparative National Elections Project (CNEP) data to answer these questions. We find that populist attitudes tend to vary across levels of education, geographic location and racial groups. Given the constant supply of populist rhetoric from the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), we expected this party to marshal electoral support from citizens holding the strongest populist attitudes. However, we contend that the party's racialised populism and radicalism ultimately handicapped it at the ballot box. The EFF ultimately suffered from citizens’ mistrust, its lack of credibility and savvy political moves by the ANC ahead of the election.

Keywords

PopulismVoting BehaviourSouth AfricaElections
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Modern African Studies , Volume 61 , Issue 2 , June 2023 , pp. 257 - 279
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The authors would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their useful feedback which has improved this paper. We would like to thank Matthias Krönke and Graham Odell for their wonderful comments on earlier versions of the paper. We are also grateful to the South African National Research Foundation (Grant No. 118512) for funding the 2019 survey data analysed for this paper.

References

REFERENCES

Aguilar, R. & Carlin, R.E.. 2017. ‘Ideational populism in Chile? A case study’, Swiss Political Science Review 23, 4: 404–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, A., Mudde, C. & Zaslove, A.. 2014. ‘How populist are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters’, Comparative Political Studies 47, 9: 1324–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akkerman, A., Zaslove, A. & Spruyt, B.. 2017. ‘We the people’ or ‘we the peoples’? A comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in the Netherlands’, Swiss Political Science Review 23, 4: 377–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barr, R. 2009. ‘Populists, outsiders and anti-establishment politics’, Party Politics 15, 1: 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergmann, E. 2020. Neo-nationalism: the rise of nativist populism. New York, NY: Springer Nature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhard, L. and Hänggli, R.. 2018. ‘Who holds populist attitudes? Evidence from Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review 24, 4: 510–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betz, H.G. 1993. ‘The new politics of resentment: radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe’, Comparative Politics 25, 4: 413–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischof, D. & Senninger, R.. 2018. ‘Simple politics for the people? Complexity in campaign messages and political knowledge’, European Journal of Political Research 57, 2: 473–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, A. 2019. ‘A campaign born of desperation: the “good ANC” battles the “bad ANC” in the electoral last chance saloon’, in Schulz-Herzenberg, C. & Southall, R., eds. Election 2019: change and stability in South Africa's democracy. Johannesburg: Jacana, 66–82.Google Scholar
Carbone, G.M. 2005. ‘“Populism” visits Africa: the case of Yoweri Museveni and no-party democracy in Uganda’, manuscript.Google Scholar
Castanho Silva, B. 2017. ‘Contemporary populism: actors, causes, and consequences across 28 democracies’, manuscript.Google Scholar
Castanho Silva, B. 2019. ‘Populist success: a qualitative comparative analysis’, in Hawkins, K.A., Carlin, R.E., Littvay, L. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C., eds. The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge, 279–93.Google Scholar
Chazan, N., Lewis, P., Mortimer, R.A., Rothchild, D. & Stedman, S.J.. 1999. Politics and Society in Contemporary Africa. Third edition. New York, NY: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheeseman, N. 2018. ‘Populism in Africa and the potential for “ethnically blind” politics’, in de la Torre, C., ed. Routledge Handbook of Global Populism. New York, NY: Routledge, 357–69.Google Scholar
Cheeseman, N. & Larmer, M.. 2015. ‘Ethnopopulism in Africa: opposition mobilization in diverse and unequal societies’, Democratization 22, 1: 22–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elchardus, M. & Spruyt, B.. 2016. ‘Populism, persistent republicanism and declinism: an empirical analysis of populism as a thin ideology’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 51, 1: 111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, K.E. 2010. Framing the Race in South Africa: the political origins of racial census elections. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fölscher, M., de Jager, N. & Nyenhuis, R.. 2021. ‘Populist parties shifting the political discourse? A case study of the Economic Freedom Fighters in South Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies 59, 4: 535–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habib, A. & Schulz-Herzenberg, C.. 2011. ‘Democratization and parliamentary opposition in contemporary South Africa: The 2009 national and provincial elections in perspective’, Politikon 38, 2: 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A.S. 2022. Everyday Identity and Electoral Politics: race, ethnicity, and the bloc vote in South Africa and beyond. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, K.A. 2009. ‘Is Chavez Populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective’, Comparative Political Studies 42, 8: 1040–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, K.A., Carlin, R.E., Littvay, L. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (eds) 2019. The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K.A. & Kaltwasser, C.R.. 2017. ‘The ideational approach to populism’, Latin American Research Review 52, 4: 513–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, K.A., Kaltwasser, C.R. & Andreadis, I.. 2020. ‘The activation of populist attitudes’, Government and Opposition 55, 2: 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, S. & Aidoo, R.. 2014. ‘Charting the roots of anti-Chinese populism in Africa: a comparison of Zambia and Ghana’, Journal of Asian and African Studies 49, 2: 129–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hieda, T., Zenkyo, M. & Nishikawa, M.. 2021. ‘Do populists support populism? An examination through an online survey following the 2017 Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly election’, Party Politics 27, 2: 317–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmer, M. & Fraser, A.. 2007. ‘Of cabbages and King Cobra: populist politics and Zambia's 2006 election’, African Affairs 106, 425: 611–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrid, R.L. 2008. ‘The rise of ethnopopulism in Latin America’, World Politics 60, 3: 475–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, L. 2017. ‘Left and right populism compared: the British case’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19, 2: 282–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbete, S. 2015. ‘The Economic Freedom Fighters – South Africa's turn towards populism?’, Journal of African Elections 14, 1: 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mbete, S. 2020. ‘Out with the old, in with the new: the ANC and EFF's battle to represent the South African “People”’, in Ostiguy, P., Panizza, F. & Moffitt, B., eds. Populism in Global Perspective. New York, NY: Routledge, 240–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melber, H. 2018. ‘Populism in Southern Africa under liberation movements as governments’, Review of African Political Economy 45, 158: 678–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B. 2015. ‘How to perform crisis: a model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism’, Government and Opposition: An International Journal of Comparative Politics 50, 2: 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, B. & Tormey, S.. 2014. ‘Rethinking populism: politics, mediatisation and political style’, Political Studies 62, 2: 381–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C.. 2018. ‘Studying populism in comparative perspective: reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda’, Comparative Political Studies 51, 3: 1667–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, J.W. 2016. What is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutsvairo, B. & Salgado, S.. 2021. ‘Populism in Africa: personalistic leaders and the illusion of representation’, in Tumber, H. & Waisbord, S., eds. The Routledge Companion to Media Disinformation and Populism. New York, NY: Routledge, 335–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, P. & Inglehart, R.. 2019. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyenhuis, R. 2020. ‘The political struggle for “the people”: populist discourse in the 2019 South African elections’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics 58, 4: 409–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyenhuis, R. & Krönke, M.. 2019. ‘The 2019 South African Elections’, Journal of African Elections 18, 12: 112–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochoa Espejo, P. 2015. ‘Power to whom? The people between procedure and populism’, in de la Torre, C., ed. The Promises and Perils of Populism: Global Perspectives. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 351–69.Google Scholar
Ostiguy, P. 2017. ‘A socio-cultural approach’, in Ostiguy, P., Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P. & Ochoa Espejo, P., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 74–96.Google Scholar
Resnick, D. 2017. ‘Populism in Africa’, in Ostiguy, P., Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P. & Ochoa Espejo, P., eds. Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 101–20.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. 1999. Election'99 South Africa: From Mandela to Mbeki. Cape Town: New Africa Books.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. 2019. ‘Economic Freedom Fighters: authoritarian or democratic contestant?’ In Schulz-Herzenberg, C. & Southall, R., eds. Election 2019: change and stability in South Africa's democracy. Johannesburg: Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung, 97–112.Google Scholar
Rothchild, D. & Gyimah-Boadi, E.. 1989. ‘Populism in Ghana and Burkina Faso’, Current History 88, 538: 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rovira Kaltwasser, C. & van Hauwaert, S.M.. 2020. ‘The populist citizen: empirical evidence from Europe and Latin America’, European Political Science Review 12, 1: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D.S., Wettstein, M. & Wirth, W.. 2018. ‘Measuring populist attitudes on three dimensions’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 30, 2: 316–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz-Herzenberg, C. 2009. ‘Trends in party support and voter behaviour, 1994–2009’. In Southall, R. & Daniel, J., eds. Zunami. Johannesburg: Jacana, 23–46.Google Scholar
Silva, B.C., Andreadis, I., Anduiza, E., Blanuša, N., Corti, Y.M., Delfino, G., … & Littvay, L.. 2019. ‘Public opinion surveys: A new scale’. In Hawkins, K.A., Carlin, R.E., Littvay, L. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C., eds. The ideational approach to populism. New York, NY: Routledge, 150–177.Google Scholar
Spierings, N. & Zaslove, A.. 2017. ‘Gender, populist attitudes, and voting: explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties’, West European Politics 40, 4: 821–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spruyt, B., Keppens, G. & Van Droogenbroeck, F.. 2016. ‘Who supports populism and what attracts people to it?’, Political Research Quarterly 69, 2: 335–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsatsanis, E., Andreadis, I. & Teperoglou, E.. 2018. ‘Populism from below: socio-economic and ideological correlates of mass attitudes in Greece’, South European Society and Politics 23, 4: 429–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hauwaert, S.M. & van Kessel, S.. 2018. ‘Beyond protest and discontent: a cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support’, European Journal of Political Research 57, 1: 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Hauwaert, S.M., Schimpf, C.H. & Dandoy, R.. 2019. ‘Populist demand, economic development and regional identity across nine European countries: exploring regional patterns of variance’, European Societies 21, 2: 303–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vincent, L. 2011. ‘Seducing the people: populism and the challenge to democracy in South Africa’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies 29, 1: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. 2015. The Politics of Fear: what right-wing populist discourses mean. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Nyenhuis and Schulz-Herzenberg supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Nyenhuis and Schulz-Herzenberg supplementary material(File)
File 21.5 KB