Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T00:04:28.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electronic Charts for Oceangoing Vessels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2009

Colin G. Weeks
Affiliation:
(Hydrographic Associates, Inc., Houston)

Abstract

It is probable that Congress will require oceangoing ships in US ports to use Differential GPS (DGPS) and electronic charts once DGPS is available on all coasts of the US, which is currently scheduled for completion by the end of 1996. The type of electronic chart currently envisaged, the Electronic Chart Display and Information System (ECDIS) under development by the IMO & IHO, is unsuitable for those ports which are entered through long dredged channels – a category that includes Houston, Gramercy and New Orleans, the three ports which handled the most foreign tonnage in 1991. A different type of electronic chart has been in daily use in such channels, with microwave positioning, since 1984; the combination of DGPS with such a software package has been called an Electronic Navigation System (ENS) and differs from ECDIS in that the ENS is designed to supplement the published chart, not replace it. The paper suggests that the utility of ECDIS would be enhanced if its specifications were modified to allow the entry of the data files used by the ENS, thus giving ECDIS a similar capability for blind navigation in confined waters. Standardization of the current data format would also permit alternative versions of ENS to be developed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1GPS World, April, 1992, p. 20.Google Scholar
2Weeks, C. (1991). ECS or ECDIS - or ENS? Hydrographic Journal, July.Google Scholar
3Hederstrom, H. and Gyldén, S. (1992). Safer navigation in the 90s – integrated bridge systems. This Journal 45, 370.Google Scholar
4Rogoff, M. (1992). Expected results of the ECDIS test bed project by 1993 and beyond. Proceedings of the U.S. Hydrographic Conference, 2528 February.Google Scholar
5Hederstrom, & Gyldén, , Proceedings of the U.S. Hydrographic Conference, p. 371.Google Scholar
6Weeks, C. (1992). The price of ECDIS – is it worth paying? International Hydrographic Review, March.Google Scholar
7Littlewood, B. and Strigini, L. (1992). The risks of software. Scientific American, November.CrossRefGoogle Scholar