Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T19:07:24.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Navigation and Control of Supersonic Aircraft

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 January 2010

William L. Polhemus
Affiliation:
(United States Air Force)

Extract

This paper, which was presented at an Ordinary Meeting of the Institute held in London on 17 November 1961, discusses aspects of high-speed, high-altitude navigation which will have a bearing on the selection of a navigation system and control philosophy for supersonic transports. The effects of certain separation criteria on systems accuracy are described, as are meteorological factors bearing on operation of the aircraft. Estimated performance capabilities which relate to traffic control and navigation are described. An analysis is offered of the effects of particular system accuracies on the selection of components of a navigation system and, finally, an integrated system is described, with arguments presented for certain levels of redundancy, reliability and automation.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Florence, D. E. and Lee, V. A. (1958). A cruise range correction method for spherical rotating Earth effects. Advanced Flight Paths Analysis Group, General Dynamics/Fort Worth MR-A-1176, 31 October.Google Scholar
Gracey, W. (1961). Survey of altitude-measuring methods for the vertical separation of aircraft, NASA Technical Note D-738.Google Scholar
Gracey, W. and Shipp, J. (1961). Random deviations from cruise altitudes of a turbojet transport at altitudes between 20,000 and 41,000 ft. NASA Technical Note D-820, April.Google Scholar
Goody, R. M.The Physics of the Atmosphere, Cambridge University Press, 1958.Google Scholar
Koetsch, J. F, (1961). A Three-dimensional Mathematical Model of the Air Traffic Control Separation Problem. Research Division. Bureau of Research & Development, Federal Aviation Agency.Google Scholar
Reich, B. G. (1961). R.A.E. Report. UDC 636.7.05:629.13.1:533.6.011.5., March.Google Scholar
Collection of Papers presented at the American Institute of Navigation S.S.T. Symposium, 19–21 June 1961.Google Scholar
Report of ION S.S.T. Advisory Committee, American Institute of Navigation, 12 September 1961.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. W. (1960). A philosophy of navigation. This Journal, 14, 1.Google Scholar
Pratt, D.Why a supersonic transport? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Institute of Navigation at Williamsburg, Va., June, 1961.Google Scholar
Roys, G. P. Operation of an F-106A in thunderstorms at supersonic and high subsonic speeds. Joint NASA-USAF Study, June 1961.Google Scholar
Teweles, S. (1961). Time section and hodograph analysis of Churchill rocket and radiosonde winds and temperatures. U.S. Weather Bureau Monthly Weather Review, 89, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doppler, D.R.Navigation Systems, P.A. Noxon Eclipse-Pioneer, Bendix Corp.Google Scholar
Power, J. K. Some considerations of sonic boom, F.A.A. Report, June 1961.Google Scholar
Koch, W. L. Meteorological requirements for S.S.T., Borg-Warner Controls, Contract No. FAA/BRD-139, September 1961.Google Scholar
Swain, and Wohl, . Factors affecting the degree of automation in test and checkout equipment. From a paper by Lt. Colonel Doom, I.O.N. Symposium, June 1961.Google Scholar
Paradiso, M. A.Summary of equipment limitations. Personal letter to W. L. Polhemus, September 1961.Google Scholar
The Supersonic Transport—A Symposium (1961). Navigation, Los Angeles, 8, 77174.Google Scholar