Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T20:57:47.067Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Review of Navigation Involving General Aviation Pilots Flying under Visual Flight Rules

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2018

Elena Psyllou ,
Arnab Majumdar  and
Washington Ochieng
Elena Psyllou*
Affiliation:
(Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London)
Arnab Majumdar
Affiliation:
(Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London)
Washington Ochieng
Affiliation:
(Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London)
*
(E-mail: elena.psyllou11@imperial.ac.uk)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

General Aviation (GA) pilots need, more than ever, to be constantly aware of their aircraft's position especially when they navigate in areas surrounded by controlled airspace. With pilots being taught to navigate using visual landmarks and radio, the increasing use of space-based navigation aids might degrade the pilot's performance. Given limited literature resources on navigation by GA pilots, the following three navigation methods are outlined: visual, radio-based and space-based navigation. 27 GA pilots were interviewed in three European nations to determine the navigation methods currently used and their impact on the pilots’ performance. The selection of the participants based on aircraft type (fixed-wing, ultralight and glider), in three European nations highlights profound differences in navigation between the three most popular aircraft designs. Furthermore, space-based navigation aids, in particular portable computers, have changed both planning and navigation implying that changes in the training of pilots are urgently needed to enhance the pilot's performance, and subsequently, to promote aviation safety.

Keywords

AviationHuman FactorsSafetySatellite NavigationRoute Planning
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 71 , Issue 5 , September 2018 , pp. 1130 - 1142
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Air Navigation Services Finland. (2017). Aeronautical charts. Available from: https://ais.fi/ais/eaip/en/ [Accessed 20/07/2017].Google Scholar
Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA). (2001). Collision Avoidance: Strategies and Tactics. Safety Advisor, Operations and Proficiency. Available from: https://www.aopa.org/-/media/files/aopa/home/news/all-news/ /2001/aopa-action-(5)/sa15.pdf?la=Google Scholar
Civil Aviation Safety Authority. (2016). Operational Notes on VHF Omni Range (VOR) Contents. Australian Government. Available from: https://www.casa.gov.au/sites/g/files/net351/f/_assets/main/pilots/download/vor.pdfGoogle Scholar
Coyle, A. and Lyons, E. (2007) Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology. SAGE Publications. Available from: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/imperial/detail.action?docID=783505.Google Scholar
Elliott, R., Fischer, C.T. and Rennie, D.L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 38(3), 215–229.Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2009). Annex 4 Aeronautical Charts to the Convention on International Civil Aviation 11th edition. Canada.Google Scholar
International Civil Aviation Organization. (2005). International Standards Annex 2 to the Convention on International Civil Aviation. Rules of the Air 10th edition. International Civil Aviation Organization.Google Scholar
Loss of Control Action Group. (2013). Monitoring Matters. Guidance on the Development of Pilot Monitoring Skills. UK, CAA. Report number: CAA Paper 2013/02 [2nd Edition].Google Scholar
Ministry of Defence. (1967). Royal Air Force Manual: Flying Volume G Air Navigation. United Kingdom, Ministry of Defence.Google Scholar
MMXIV Divelements Limited. (2015). SkyDemon. Available from: http://www.skydemon.aero/.Google Scholar
NATS and Civil Aviation Authority of United Kingdom. (2016). Aeronautical chart ICAO. 1:500000.Google Scholar
O'Hare, D. and Stenhouse, N. (2009) Under the weather: An evaluation of different modes of presenting meteorological information for pilots. Applied Ergonomics, 40(4), 688–693.Google Scholar
Royal Institute of Navigation. (2008). Visual Navigation Techniques for Pilots. United Kingdom, Royal Institute of Navigation.Google Scholar
Volpe Center. (2009). Utility and recognition of lines and linear patterns on electronic displays depicting aeronautical charting information. Virginia, National Technical Information Service, Springfield. Report number: DOT/FAA/AR-09/01.Google Scholar
Volpe Center. (2007). Pilot identification of symbols and an exploration of symbol design issues for electronic displays of aeronautical charting information. Springfield, Virginia, National Technical Information Service. Report number: DOT/FAA/AR-07/37.Google Scholar
Wickens, C., Xu, X., Helleberg, J.R., Carbonari, R. and Marsh, R. (2000) The Allocation of Visual Attention for Aircraft Traffic Monitoring and Avoidance: Baseline Measures and Implications for Freeflight. Illinois, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Wiggins, M. (2007). Perceived GPS use and weather-related decision strategies among pilots. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 17(3), 249.Google Scholar