Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-dtkg6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T07:34:59.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ship Routing—Present Status and Future Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2009

J. Paton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Commander Paton's paper, here slightly condensed, was presented at the Fourth International Symposium on Vessel Traffic Services held in Bremen from 28 to 30 April 1981. The author is Hydrographic Adviser to the Department of Trade, but the views expressed here should not be taken to represent those of the Department. Commander Paton has also for some years been Chairman of IMCO's Working Group on routing matters.

Apart from some wartime measures, modern ship routing really dates from the early sixties, when the Institutes of Navigation in Britain, France and Germany set up a joint Working Group on traffic separation. The principal result of their labours was the Dover Strait traffic separation scheme, jointly submitted to IMCO by the British, French and German Governments and implemented in 1967. This was followed by various proposals for the North Sea, Baltic and elsewhere, considerable impetus being given by the Torrey Canyon disaster off the Scilly Isles in 1967.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Navigation , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , January 1982 , pp. 113 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Navigation 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1IMCO Resolution A. 378 (X), General Provisions on Ship's Kouteing, adopted 14 November 1977.Google Scholar
2Cockcroft, A. N. (1978). Statistics of ship collisions. This Journal, 31, 213.Google Scholar
3IMCO Intersessional Working Group on Ships' Routeing, Paris (1980). Papers CR/3/2 (UK-F) and CR/3/3 (UK-F).Google Scholar
4Curtis, R. G. (1980). Probability of close overtaking in fog. This Journal, 33, 329.Google Scholar
5Oudet, L. (1979). Future developments in routing at sea. This Journal, 31, 53.Google Scholar
6Barratt, M. J. (1973). Encounter rates in a marine traffic separation scheme. This Journal, 26, 458.Google Scholar
7ICS/OCIMF (1977). Malacca/Singapore Straits – Guide to Planned Passages for Draught Restricted Ships.Google Scholar
8Danish Hydrographic Office (1976). Route ‘T’ – 17 Metre Transit Route Skagen to Gedser.Google Scholar