Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T06:28:39.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Osteology and phylogenetic affinities of the middle Eocene North American Bathornis grallator—one of the best represented, albeit least known Paleogene cariamiform birds (seriemas and allies)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2016

Gerald Mayr*
Affiliation:
Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt, Ornithological Section, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 〈Gerald.Mayr@senckenberg.de〉

Abstract

Bathornis (“Neocathartes”) grallator (Wetmore, 1944) from the middle Eocene of Wyoming is based on a partial skeleton, which is the most substantial record of the North American Bathornithidae and one of the most complete fossils of a Paleogene stem group representative of the Cariamiformes. So far, however, an assessment of the evolutionary significance of this important fossil has been hampered by the limited published osteological data. Moreover, cariamiform affinities of B. grallator and its true “genus”-level identity were recognized after the last comprehensive revision of the Bathornithidae, and some of its features were incorrectly portrayed in the original description. Here, the B. grallator holotype is restudied and the taxonomic composition and phylogenetic affinities of bathornithids are revised. It is suggested to restrict Bathornithidae to the taxon Bathornis, from which the putative bathornithid Paracrax differs in numerous features, with even cariamiform affinities of this latter taxon not having been established beyond doubt. B. grallator was a flightless bird and has recently been hypothesized to be the sister taxon of the likewise flightless South American Phorusrhacidae. The present analysis, however, supports a position outside a clade including Phorusrhacidae and Cariamidae (the cariamiform crown clade). Owing to their terrestrial way of living, Cariamiformes appear to have been prone to a loss of flight capabilities. B. grallator shows close similarities to a flightless cariamiform bird from the Paleogene of Europe, but the phylogenetic significance of this resemblance is difficult to assess owing to the limited material known of the latter species.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agnolín, F.L., 2009, Sistemática y filogenia de las aves fororracoideas (Gruiformes: Cariamae), Buenos Aires, Fundación de Historia Natural Félix de Azara, 79 p.Google Scholar
Alvarenga, H.M.F., and Höfling, E., 2003, Systematic revision of the Phorusrhacidae (Aves: Ralliformes): Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia, v. 43, p. 5591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, C.W., 1899, On the Extinct Birds of Patagonia. 1. The Skull and Skeleton of Phororhacos inflatus Ameghino: Transactions of the Zoological Society of London, v. 15, p. 5586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angst, D., Buffetaut, E., Lécuyer, C., and Amiot, R., 2013, “Terror birds” (Phorusrhacidae) from the Eocene of Europe imply trans-Tethys dispersal: PLoS ONE, v. 8, e80357.Google Scholar
Baumel, J.J., and Witmer, L.M., 1993, Osteologia, in Baumel, J.J., King, A.S., Breazile, J.E., Evans, H.E., and Vanden Berge, J.C., eds., Handbook of avian anatomy: Nomina anatomica avium, 2nd ed. Publications of the Nuttall Ornithological Club, v. 23, p. 45132.Google Scholar
Chandler, R.M., 1994, The wing of Titanis walleri (Aves: Phorusrhacidae) from the late Blancan of Florida: Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, Biological Sciences, v. 36, p. 175180.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J., 1968, A review of the Bathornithidae (Aves, Gruiformes), with remarks on the relationships of the suborder Cariamae: American Museum Novitates, v. 2326, p. 146.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J., 1971, Systematics and evolution of the Gruiformes (Class Aves) 2. Additional comments on the Bathornithidae, with descriptions of new species: American Museum Novitates, v. 2449, p. 114.Google Scholar
De Pietri, V.L., and Mayr, G., 2014, The enigmatic Ibidopodia palustris from the Early Miocene of France - the first Neogene record of Cariamiformes (Aves) in Europe: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 34, p. 14701475.Google Scholar
Degrange, F.J., Tambussi, C.P., Taglioretti, M.L., Dondas, A., and Scaglia, F., 2015a, A new Mesembriornithinae (Aves, Phorusrhacidae) provides new insights into the phylogeny and sensory capabilities of terror birds: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, v. 35, e912656.Google Scholar
Degrange, F.J., Noriega, J.I., and Vizcaíno, S.F., 2015b, Morphology of the forelimb of Psilopterus bachmanni (Aves, Cariamiformes) (early Miocene of Patagonia): Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 89, p. 10871096.Google Scholar
Ericson, P.G.P., Anderson, C.L., Britton, T., Elzanowski, A., Johansson, U.S., Källersjö, M., Ohlson, J.I., Parsons, T.J., Zuccon, D., and Mayr, G., 2006, Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils: Biology Letters, v. 2, p. 543547.Google Scholar
Friscia, A.R., and Rasmussen, D.T., 2010, Middle Eocene Carnivoramorpha of the Uinta Basin, Utah: Annals of Carnegie Museum, v. 79, p. 5163.Google Scholar
Gaillard, C., 1908, Les oiseaux des Phosphorites du Quercy: Annales de l’Université de Lyon (Nouvelle Série), v. 23, p. 1178.Google Scholar
Gaillard, C., 1939, Contribution à l’étude des oiseaux fossiles: Archives du Museum d’histoire naturelle de Lyon, v. 15(2), p. 1100.Google Scholar
Goloboff, P.A., 1993, NONA version 2.0 [Computer software]: Published by the author, S. M. de Tucumán, Argentina.Google Scholar
Gonzaga, L.P., 1996, Family Cariamidae (seriemas), in del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A., and Sargatal, J., eds., Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol. 3, Barcelona, Lynx Edicions, p. 234239.Google Scholar
Gould, G.C., and Quitmyer, I.R., 2005, Titanis walleri: bones of contention: Bulletin of the Florida Museum of Natural History, v. 45, p. 201229.Google Scholar
Grajal, A., 1995, Structure and function of the digestive tract of the hoatzin (Opisthocomus hoazin): a folivorous bird with foregut fermentation: The Auk, v. 112, p. 2028.Google Scholar
Hackett, S.J., et al., 2008, A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history: Science, v. 320, p. 17631767.Google Scholar
Jarvis, E.D., et al., 2014, Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds: Science, v. 346, p. 13201331.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2000, New or previously unrecorded avian taxa from the Middle Eocene of Messel (Hessen, Germany): Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe, v. 3, p. 207219.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2002, A new specimen of Salmila robusta (Aves: Gruiformes: Salmilidae n. fam.) from the Middle Eocene of Messel: Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 76, p. 305316.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2005, “Old World phorusrhacids” (Aves, Phorusrhacidae): a new look at Strigogyps (“Aenigmavis”) sapea (Peters 1987): PaleoBios, v. 25, p. 1116.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2006, A new raptorial bird from the Middle Eocene of Messel, Germany: Historical Biology, v. 18, p. 95102.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2007, Synonymy and actual affinities of the putative Middle Eocene “New World vulture” Eocathartes Lambrecht, 1935 and “hornbill” Geiseloceros Lambrecht, 1935 (Aves, Ameghinornithidae): Paläontologische Zeitschrift, v. 81, p. 457462.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2009a, Paleogene fossil birds, Heidelberg, Germany, Springer, 262 p.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2009b, A well-preserved skull of the “falconiform” bird Masillaraptor from the middle Eocene of Messel (Germany): Palaeodiversity, v. 2, p. 315320.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2011, Two-phase extinction of “Southern Hemispheric” birds in the Cenozoic of Europe and the origin of the Neotropic avifauna: Palaeobiodiversity and Palaeoenvironments, v. 91, p. 325333.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., 2016, Variations in the hypotarsus morphology of birds and their evolutionary significance: Acta Zoologica, v. 97, p. 196210.Google Scholar
Mayr, G., and Mourer-Chauviré, C., 2006, Three-dimensionally preserved cranial remains of Elaphrocnemus (Aves, Cariamae) from the Paleogene Quercy fissure fillings in France: Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte, v. 2006(1), p. 1527.Google Scholar
McCarroll, S.M., Flynn, J.J., and Turnbull, W.D., 1996, Biostratigraphy and magnetostratigraphy of the Bridgerian-Uintan Washakie Formation, Washakie Basin, Wyoming, in Prothero, D.R., and Emry, R.J., eds., The Terrestrial Eocene-Oligocene Transition in North America, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 2539.Google Scholar
Mourer-Chauviré, C., 1981, Première indication de la présence de Phorusrhacidés, famille d’oiseaux géants d’Amérique du Sud, dans le Tertiaire européen: Ameghinornis nov. gen. (Aves, Ralliformes) des Phosphorites du Quercy, France: Geobios, v. 14, p. 637647.Google Scholar
Mourer-Chauviré, C., 1983, Les Gruiformes (Aves) des Phosphorites du Quercy (France). 1. Sous-ordre Cariamae (Cariamidae et Phorusrhacidae): Systématique et biostratigraphie: Palaeovertebrata, v. 13, p. 83143.Google Scholar
Mourer-Chauviré, C., 2013, Idiornis Oberholser, 1899 (Aves, Gruiformes, Cariamae, Idiornithidae): a junior synonym of Dynamopterus Milne-Edwards, 1892 (Paleogene, Phosphorites du Quercy, France): Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie-Abhandlungen, v. 270, p. 1322.Google Scholar
Mourer-Chauviré, C., Tabuce, R., Mahboubi, M. H., Adaci, M., and Bensalah, M., 2011, A Phororhacoid bird from the Eocene of Africa: Naturwissenschaften, v. 98, p. 815823.Google Scholar
Nixon, K.C., 2002, WinClada, version 1.00.08 [Computer software]: Published by the author, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Olson, S.L., 1985, The fossil record of birds, in Farner, D.S., King, J.R., and Parkes, K.C., eds., Avian Biology, v. 8: New York, Academic Press, p. 79238.Google Scholar
Peters, D.S., 1987, Ein “Phorusrhacide” aus dem Mittel-Eozän von Messel (Aves: Gruiformes: Cariamae): Documents des Laboratoires de Géologie de Lyon, v. 99, p. 7187.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, D.T., Conroy, G.C., Friscia, A.R., Townsend, K.E., and Kinkel, M.D., 1999, Mammals of the middle Eocene Uinta Formation, in Gillette, D.D., ed., Vertebrate Paleontology in Utah: Utah Geological Survey Miscellaneous Publication, v. 99–1, p. 401420.Google Scholar
Sinclair, W.J., and Farr, M.S., 1932, Aves of the Santa Cruz Beds: Rep. Princeton Univ. Exp. Patagonia, 1896-1899, v. 7(2), p. 157191.Google Scholar
Smith, A.G., Smith, D.G., and Funnell, B.M., 1994, Atlas of Mesozoic and Cenozoic Coastlines, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 99 p.Google Scholar
Solé, F., 2014, New carnivoraforms from the early Eocene of Europe and their bearing on the evolution of the Carnivoraformes: Palaeontology, v. 57, p. 963978.Google Scholar
van Valkenburgh, B., 1999, Major patterns in the history of carnivorous mammals: Annual Reviews of Earth and Planetary Sciences, v. 27, p. 463493.Google Scholar
Wetmore, A., 1927, Fossil birds from the Oligocene of Colorado: Proceedings of the Colorado Museum of Natural History, v. 7, p. 113.Google Scholar
Wetmore, A., 1933a, Bird remains from the Oligocene deposits of Torrington, Wyoming: Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, v. 75, p. 297311.Google Scholar
Wetmore, A., 1933b, A second specimen of the fossil bird Bathornis veredus: The Auk, v. 50, p. 213214.Google Scholar
Wetmore, A., 1937, The tibiotarsus of the fossil bird Bathornis veredus: The Condor, v. 39, p. 256257.Google Scholar
Wetmore, A., 1944, A new terrestrial vulture from the Upper Eocene deposits of Wyoming: Annals of Carnegie Museum, v. 30, p. 5769.Google Scholar
Wetmore, A., 1950, A correction in the generic name for Eocathartes grallator: The Auk, v. 67, p. 235.Google Scholar
Wetmore, A., 1958, Miscellaneous notes on fossil birds: Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, v. 135, p. 111.Google Scholar
Woodbure, M.O., 2004, Global events and the North American mammalian biochronology, in Woodbure, M.O., ed., Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic Mammals of North America: Biostratigraphy and Geochronology, New York, Columbia University Press, p. 315343.Google Scholar