Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-dwq4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T12:49:38.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The first occurrence of the Burgess Shale demosponge Hazelia palmata Walcott, 1920, in the Cambrian of Utah

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

J. Keith Rigby
Affiliation:
1Department of Geology, Room 673 Widtsoe Building, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84602-5111
Lloyd F. Gunther
Affiliation:
228 North 2nd West, Brigham City, Utah 84302
Freida Gunther
Affiliation:
228 North 2nd West, Brigham City, Utah 84302

Abstract

A single specimen of Hazelia palmata Walcott, 1920, was collected from the Middle Cambrian Marjum Formation near Marjum Pass, in the central House Range, western Utah. This is a first occurrence of the species outside the Burgess shale region of British Columbia, Canada. The flattened oval impression of the monaxonid demosponge shows characteristic tufts and spicule structures of the species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brady, M. J., and Keopnick, R. B. 1979. A middle Cambrian platform-to-basin transition, House Range, west-central Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 26:17.Google Scholar
Brett, C. E. 1983. Sedimentology, facies and depositional environments of the Rochester Shale (Silurian: Wenlockian) in western New York and Ontario. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, 53:947971.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F. 1988. Geologic History of Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, Special Publication 7, 202 p.Google Scholar
Hintze, L. F., and Robinson, R. A. 1975. Middle Cambrian stratigraphy of the House, Wah Wah, and adjacent ranges in western Utah. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 86:881891.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laubenfels, M. W. De. 1955. Porifera, p. E21E112. In Moore, R. C. (ed.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part E. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Lévi, C. 1956. Étude des Halisarca de Rosocoff. Embryologie et systématics des Démosponges. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generale, 93, 181 p.Google Scholar
Rees, M. N. 1984. A fault-controlled trough through a carbonate platform; Middle Cambrian House Range embayment, Utah and Nevada. Unpubl. , University of Kansas, Lawrence, 1935 p.Google Scholar
Rigby, J. K. 1986. Sponges of the Burgess Shale (Middle Cambrian) British Columbia. Palaeontographica Canadiana, Number 2, 105 p.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1964. Late Middle Cambrian faunas from western Utah. Journal of Paleontology, 38:510566.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A. 1984. Cambrian Agnostida of North America and Greenland; Part 1, Ptychagnostidae. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 109:159.Google Scholar
Robison, R. A., and Richards, B. C. 1981. Larger bivalve arthropods from the Middle Cambrian of Utah. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 106:119.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1875. Sponges, p. 451. In Baynes, T. S. (ed.), A dictionary of Arts and Sciences and General Literature, Encyclopaedia Britannica, 9th edition, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Sollas, W. J. 1883. The Group Spongiae, p. 312331, In Duncan, P. M. (ed.), Cassell's Natural History, Volume 6, London.Google Scholar
Sprinkle, J. 1985. New edrioasteroids from the Middle Cambrian of western Utah. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 116, 4 p.Google Scholar
Ubaghs, G., and Robinson, R. A. 1985. A new homoiostelean and a new eocrinoid from the Middle Cambrian of Utah. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, Paper 115, 24 p.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1920. Cambrian Geology and Paleontology. IV. Middle Cambrian Spongiae. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 67:261364.Google Scholar