Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T14:22:59.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The holotype skull of Llistrofus pricei Carroll and Gaskill, 1978 (Microsauria: Hapsidopareiontidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

John R. Bolt
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, ,
Olivier Rieppel
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Field Museum of Natural History, 1400 South Lake Shore Drive, Chicago, Illinois 60605, ,

Abstract

The Hapsidopareiontidae are microsaurian amphibians known only from the Lower Permian of the U.S. The hapsidopareiontid skull has a large temporal embayment that occupies most of the area of the cheek, in which the quadratojugal is either absent (Hapsidopareion) or present and greatly reduced (Llistrofus). the unique holotype skull of Llistrofus pricei is well preserved in soft clay. It was originally prepared and described in dorsal view only, but has now been prepared completely free of the matrix. This permitted the first description of the palate, occiput and mandible along with a redescription of the rest of the skull, resulting in substantial emendation of previously published descriptions. Comparison with the eight known complete and partial skulls of Hapsidopareion lepton demonstrates that the two genera are much more similar than had been recognized earlier. Their continued separation is advocated, however, based on size difference, a small number of osteological differences, and the difficulty of obtaining comparably detailed morphological information for Hapsidopareion, which is less well preserved than the Llistrofus specimen. the new morphological information, combined with results of recently published cladistic analyses, suggests that Hapsidopareion and Llistrofus are the only microsaurs that can at present be assigned to the Hapsidopareiontidae. the large temporal embayment of hapsidopareiontids might be thought to have significant functional implications, possibly including “escape” of jaw adductor musculature onto the skull roof. Detailed consideration of this possibility reveals morphological evidence to the contrary, however, and the functional implications of the embayment remain uncertain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, J. S. 2001. The phylogenetic trunk: Maximal inclusion of taxa with missing data in an analysis of the Lepospondyli (Vertebrata, Tetrapoda). Systematic Biology, 50:170193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, J. S. 2007. Incorporating ontogeny into the matrix: A phylogenetic evaluation of developmental evidence for the origins of modern amphibians, p. 183212. In Anderson, J. S. and Sues, H.-D. (eds.), Major Transitions in Vertebrate Evolution. Indiana University Press, Bloomington.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. S., Reisz, R. R., Scott, D., Fröbisch, N. B., and Sumida, S. S. 2008. A stem batrachian from the Early Permian of Texas and the origin of frogs and salamanders. Nature, 453:515518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolt, J. R. and Lombard, R. E. 2001. The mandible of the primitive tetrapod Greererpeton, and the early evolution of the tetrapod lower jaw. Journal of Paleontology, 75:10161042.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, R. L. 1998. Order Microsauria Dawson 1863, p. 172. In Wellnhofer, P. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Paleoherpetology Part 1/Lepospondyli. Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. L. and Gaskill, P. 1978. The Order Microsauria. Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, 126:1211.Google Scholar
Daly, E. 1973. A Lower Permian vertebrate fauna from southern Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 47:562589.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. W. 1863 Air breathers of the Coal Period. American Journal of Science, 36:430432.Google Scholar
Fritsch, A. 1883. Fauna der Gaskohle und der Kalksteine der Permformation Böhmens, Volume 1, Prague, 182 p.Google Scholar
Laurin, M. 1998. The importance of global parsimony and historical bias in understanding tetrapod evolution, Pt. I—systematics, middle ear evolution, and jaw suspension. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Zoologie, Paris, 13e série, 19:142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurin, M. and Reisz, R. R. 1997. A new perspective on tetrapod phylogeny, p. 959. In Sumida, S. S. and Martin, K. L. M. (eds.), Amniote Origins - Completing the Transition to Land. Academic Press, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombard, R. E. and Bolt, J. R. 1999. A microsaur from the Mississippian of Illinois and a standard format for morphological characters. Journal of Paleontology, 73:908923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombard, R. E. and Bolt, J. R. 2003. Morphology and functional implications of the mandible of Whatcheeria deltae from the Late Mississippian of Iowa, p. 2152. In Carrano, M. T., Gaudin, T. J., Blob, R. W., and Wible, J. R. (eds.), Amniote Paleobiology: Perspectives on the Evolution of Mammals, Birds, and Reptiles. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Modesto, S. P. 1998. New information on the skull of the Early Permian reptile Captorhinus aguti. Paleobios, 18:2135.Google Scholar
Ruta, M. and Coates, M. I. 2007. Dates, nodes and character conflict: Addressing the lissamphibian origin problem. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, 5:69122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruta, M., Coates, M. I., and Quicke, D. L. J. 2003. Early tetrapod relationships revisited. Biological Reviews, 78:251345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sullivan, C., Reisz, R. R., and May, W. J. 2000. Large dissorophoid skeletal elements from the Lower Permian Richards Spur fissures, Oklahoma, and their paleoecological implications. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, 20:456461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar