Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T04:50:04.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New views of plant fossils from Antarctica: a comparison of X-ray and neutron imaging techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Martin Dawson ,
Jane Francis  and
Rosemary Carpenter
Martin Dawson
Affiliation:
School of Computing, Science and Engineering, University of Salford, M5 4WT, UK,
Jane Francis
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, British Antarctic Survey, Cambridge, UK, CB3 OET,
Rosemary Carpenter
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A fossil plant of Eocene age from Antarctica was studied using X-ray and neutron tomography to reveal the three-dimensional plant structures encased within carbonate nodules. The fossil was identified as a branch and leaves of an araucarian conifer, which grew on the volcanic highlands of the Antarctic Peninsula region approximately 50 million yr ago. Both X-ray and neutron imaging techniques successfully exposed the full three-dimensional structure of the fossil without destroying the original specimen, revealing that most of the fossil was present as voids in the concretion and little organic matter was present. However, neutron tomography was found to produce images with superior quality and detail.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 88 , Issue 4 , July 2014 , pp. 702 - 707
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, I. S., McGreevy, R. L., and Bilheux, H. Z.(eds.). 2009. Neutron Imaging and Applications, Section C. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Cantrill, D. J. and Poole, I. 2005. A new Eocene Araucaria from Seymour Island, Antarctica: evidence from growth form and bark morphology. Alcheringa, 29:341–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, R. S. 2007. Palaeoenvironmental and climatic significance of an Araucaria-dominated Eocene flora from Seymour Island, Antarctica. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Leeds, U.K.Google Scholar
Francis, J. E., Ashworth, A., Cantrill, D. J., Crame, J. A., Howe, J., Stephens, R., Tosolini, A.-M., and Thorn, V. 2008. 100 million years of Antarctic climate evolution: evidence from fossil plants, p. 19–27. InCooper, A. K., Barrett, P. J., Stagg, H., Storey, B., Stump, E., Wise, W. (eds.), Antarctic: A Keystone in a Changing World. The National Academic Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hathway, B. 2000. Continental rift to back-arc basin: Jurassic-Cretaceous stratigraphical and structural evolution of the Larsen Basin, Antarctic Peninsula. Journal of the Geological Society of London, 157:417–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, P. A., Francis, J. E., Cantrill, D. J., and Crame, J. A. 2006. Palaeoclimatic analysis of late Cretaceous angiosperm leaf floras, James Ross Island, Antarctica, p. 49–62. InFrancis, J. E., Pirrie, D., Crame, J. A. (eds.), Cretaceous–Tertiary high-latitude palaeoenvironments, James Ross Basin, Antarctica. Geological Society of London Special Publication 258.Google Scholar
Hilger, A., Kardjilov, N., Strobl, M., Treimer, W., and Banhart, J. 2006. The new cold neutron radiography and tomography instrument CONRAD at HMI Berlin. Physica B: Condensed Matter, 385:1,213–1,215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardjilov, N., Hilger, A., Manke, I., Strobl, M., Dawson, M., and Banhart, J. 2009. New trends in neutron imaging. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 605:13–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardjilov, N., Hilger, A., Manke, I., Strobl, M., Dawson, M., Williams, S., and Banhart, J. 2011a. Neutron tomography instrument CONRAD at HZB. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 651:47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kardjilov, N., Dawson, M., Hilger, A., Manke, I., Strobl, M., Penumadu, D., Kim, F. H., Garcia–Moreno, F., and Banhart, J. 2011b. A highly adaptive detector system for high resolution neutron imaging. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 651:95–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marenssi, S. A., Santillana, S. N., and Rinaldi, C. A. 1998. Stratigraphy of the La Meseta Formation (Eocene), Marambio (Seymour) Island, Antarctica, p. 137–146. InCasadio, S. (ed.), Paleogeno de America del Sur y de la Peninsula Antartica, Asociacion Paleontologica Argentina. Publicacion Especial 5.Google Scholar
Marenssi, S. A. 2006. Eustatically controlled sedimentation recorded by Eocene strata of the James Ross Basin, Antarctica, p. 125–133. InFrancis, J. E., Pirrie, D., Crame, J. A.(eds.), Cretaceous–Tertiary High-Latitude Palaeoenvironments, James Ross Basin, Antarctica. Geological Society of London Special Publication 258.Google Scholar
Sadler, P. M. 1988. Geometry and stratification of uppermost Cretaceous and Paleogene units on Seymour Island, northern Antarctic Peninsula, p. 303–320. InFeldmann, R. M., Woodburne, M. O.(eds.), Geology and Paleontology of Seymour Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Geological Society of America Memoir 169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, A. C. and Rex, G. 1985. The formation and significance of carboniferous coal balls. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 311:123–137.Google Scholar
Smith, S. Y., Collinson, M. E., Rudall, P. J., Simpson, D. A., Marone, F., Stampanoni, M. 2009. Virtual taphonomy using synchrotron tomographic microscopy reveals cryptic features and internal structure of modern and fossil plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106 (29):12,013–12,018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton, M. D. 2008. Tomographic techniques for the study of exceptionally preserved fossils. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275.1643:1,587–1,593.Google Scholar