Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T12:36:13.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brood pouches in trilobites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Richard A. Fortey  and
Nigel C. Hughes
Richard A. Fortey
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom,
Nigel C. Hughes
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, 92521,
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

During the Cambrian and Ordovician trilobites belonging to a variety of clades developed distinctive inflated bulbs on the preglabellar field. We make the case that these bulbs were brood pouches, which were employed for retaining and protecting larval trilobites in order to ensure a higher rate of survivorship. Living arthropods of several classes develop comparable spherical structures—for example the domicilium of certain ostracodes. Living limuloids, likely the trilobites' closest living relatives, carry large and yolky eggs in an homologous, prelabral site. There are some trilobite examples where “species pairs” found in the same fossil sites appear to differ only in the presence or absence of the preglabellar bulb. These may represent the female and male of a single species, respectively. If so, this is the first well-supported case of sexual dimorphism in trilobites. Some more problematic examples are discussed, where alleged dimorphism would have to be more extreme.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 72 , Issue 4 , July 1998 , pp. 638 - 649
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adrain, J. M., and Kloc, G. 1997. Lower Devonian aulacopleuroidean trilobites from Oklahoma. Journal of Paleontology, 71:703–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babcock, L. E. 1994. Systematics and phylogenetics of polymeroid trilobites from the Henson Gletscher and Kap Stanton Formations (Middle Cambrian), North Greenland. Grønlands Geologiske Undersøgelse Bulletin, 169:78–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrande, J. 1852. Systême Silurien du centre de la Bohême. le're partie. Recherches paléontologiques, Prague and Paris, 935 p.Google Scholar
Bell, G. 1980. The costs of reproduction and their consequences. American Naturalist, 116:45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, D. E. G., and Fortey, R. A. 1989. The early radiation and relationships of the major arthropod groups. Science, 246:241–43.Google Scholar
Brusca, R. C., and Brusca, G. J. 1990. Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates, Massachusetts, 922 p.Google Scholar
Bruton, D. L. and Owen, A. W. 1988. The Norwegian Upper Ordovician illaenid trilobites. Norsk Geologisk Tidsskrift, 68:241–258.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K. 1969, Dimorphism of the eye in Weberides shunnerensis (King) [Trilobita], p. 185–195. In Westermann, G. E. G. (ed.), Sexual Dimorphism in Fossil Metazoa and Taxonomic Implications. E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Clarkson, E. N. K., and Zhang, Xi-Guang. 1991. Ontogeny of the Carboniferous trilobite Paladin eichwaldi shunnerensis (King 1914). Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 82:277–295.Google Scholar
Courtessole, R. 1973. Le Cambrien moyen de la Montagne Noire Biostratigraphie. Faculty of Science Toulouse. 241 p.Google Scholar
Dean, W. T., and Zhou, Zhi-Yi. 1988. Upper Cambrian trilobites from the Zap Valley, south–east Turkey. Palaeontology, 31:621–649.Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., Pegel, T. V., Savitsky, V. E., Suchov, S. S., and Tchernysheva, N. E. 1982. Maiskii yarus stratotypicheskoy mestnosti (srednii Kembrii yogo-vostoka Sibirskoy platformy). (Maya Stage of Type Locality [Middle Cambrian of south eastern Siberian platform]). Trudy Miniisterstvo Geologii mezhvedomstvennii stratigraphifecheskii kommtet SSSR, Akademiya nauk SSSR, 8, 145 p. [In Russian] Google Scholar
Egorova, L. I., and Savitsky, V. E. 1969. Stratigrafia i biofatsii kembriya Sibirskoy platfory, Zapadnoe Prianabar'e (Cambrian stratigraphy and biofacies of the Siberian Plaftorm, western part of the Anabar area). Trudy Sibirskogo nauchno- issledovatelskogo Instituta Geologii, Geofisiki, i mineralnogo Syrya, Ministerstva geologii i okhrany neor SSSR, 43, 403 p. [in Russian] Google Scholar
Ergaliev, G. K. 1980. Trilobity srednego i verkhneko Kembriya Malay Karatau. (Middle and Upper Cambrian trilobites of Malay Karatau). Ordena trudovogo krasnogo znameni, Trudy Institut geologicheskikh nauk, Akademiya nauk Kazakhskoy SSSR, 1, 211 p. [In Russian] Google Scholar
Ergaliev, G. K. 1983. Grantisa Kembriya i Ordovika v yozhom Kazakhstane i Ulutau. (Cambrian-Ordovician boundary in southern Kazakhstan and Ulutai) p. 6–66. In Stratigrafiya i paleontologiya Niznego Paleozoya Kazakhstana. (The Lower Paleozoic stratigraphy and paleontology of Kazakhstan) Kazakh SSR Publishing House Nauka Kazakhshoe, Almaty. [In Russian] Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1985. Pelagic trilobites as an example of deducing the life habits of extinct arthropods. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 76:219–230.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A. 1990. Ontogeny, hypostome attachment and trilobite classification, Palaeontology, 33:529–76.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Cocks, L. R. M. 1990. Biogeography of Ordovician and Silurian faunas. In McKerrow, W. S. and Scotese, C. R. (eds.), Palaeozoic Palaeogeography and Biogeography. Geological Society of London, Memoir 12:97–104.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Owens, R. M. 1990. Trilobites. p. 121–142. In McNamara, K. J. (ed.), Evolutionary Trends. Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Owens, R. M. 1991. The early Ordovician trilobite Beltella, Proceedings of the Bristol Naturalists Society, 49:69–79.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Owens, R. M. 1997. Bubble-headed trilobites, and a new olenid example. Palaeontology, 40:11–20.Google Scholar
Fortey, R. A., and Whittington, H. B. 1989. The Trilobita as a natural group. Historical Biology, 2:125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrington, A., and Leanza, A. F. 1957. Ordovician Trilobites of Argentina. University of Kansas Press and Geological Society of America. 276 p.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1957. The Trilobite family Olenidae. Skrifter Utgitt av det norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo 1. Matematisk - Naturvidenskabelig Klasse, 1:1–303.Google Scholar
Henningsmoen, G. 1965. On certain features of palaeocope ostracodes. Geologisk Foreningens i Stockholm Forhandlingar, 86:329–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hessler, R. R., and Newman, W. A. 1975. A trilobitomorph origin for the Crustacea. Fossils and Strata, 4:437–460.Google Scholar
Holloway, D. J., and Campbell, K. S. W. 1974. The Silurian trilobite Onycopyge Woodward. Palaeontology, 17:409–422.Google Scholar
Hu, C. H. 1971. Ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of Lower Paleozoic Trilobita: Palaeontographica Americana, no. 44:1–155.Google Scholar
Hu, C. H. 1985. Ontogenetic development of Cambrian trilobites from British Columbia and Alberta, Canada (Pt. 1). Journal of the Taiwan Museum, 38:121–158.Google Scholar
Hughes, N. C., and Fortey, R. A. 1995. Sexual dimorphism in trilobites, with an Ordovician case study. p. 419–421. In Cooper, J. C., Droser, M. L., and Finney, S. C. (eds.), Ordovician Odyssey, SEPM Pacific Section, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, R. D. 1962. Cambrian stratigraphy and trilobite faunas of southeastern Newfoundland. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Canada, 88:1–156.Google Scholar
Ivshin, N. K. 1956. Verkhnekembryskiye trilobity Kasakhstana (Upper Cambrian trilobites of Kazakhstan). Trudy Institut geologicheskikh nauk, Akademiya nauk Kazakhskoy SSSR, 1, 98 p. [In Russian] Google Scholar
Jaanusson, V. 1985. Functional morphology of the shell of platycope ostracodes - a study of inverted evolution. Lethaia, 18:73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1978. Trilobite respiration and genal caeca: Alcheringa, 2:251–260.Google Scholar
Jell, P. A. 1985. Tremadoc trilobites of the Digger Island Formation, Waratah Bay, Victoria. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria, 46:53–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaestner, A., 1970, Invertebrate Zoology, Volume 3. Interscience, New York. 523 p.Google Scholar
Khalfina, L. L. 1960. Biostratigrafiya paleozoya Siayano-Altaiskoy gornoy oblasti [Biostratigraphy of the Paleozoic of the Altai-Siayan mountain region]. Trudy Sibirskogo nauchno-issledovatelskogo Instituta Geologii, Geofisiki, i mineralnogo Syrya, Ministerstva geologii i okhrany neor SSSR, 19:1–498. [in Russian] Google Scholar
Lilljeborg, W. 1901. Cladocera Sueciae: Nova Acta Regia Societas Scientarum Upsaliensis. Series 3, 19:1–351.Google Scholar
Liñán, E., and Gozalo, R. 1986. Trilobites del Cambrico inferior y medio de Murero (Cordillera Iberica). Memorias del Museo Paleontologico de la Universidad de Zaragoza, 2:7–104.Google Scholar
Lu, Yan-Hao, Zhang, Wen-Tang, Qian, Yi-Yuan, Lin, Huan-Ling, Zhou, Zhi-Yi, and Yuan, K. X. 1974. Cambrian trilobites, p. 1–454. In Lu, Yan-hao, Zhang, Wen-tang, Chien, Yi-yuan, Lin, H. L., Zhou, Zhi-Yi and Yuan, K. X., A Handbook of the Stratigraphy and Paleontology of Southwestern China. Science Press, Beijing. [In Chinese] Google Scholar
Lu, Yan-Hao, and Qian, Yi-Yuan. 1983. Cambro-Ordovician trilobites from eastern Guizhou. Palaeontologia Cathayana, 1:1–105.Google Scholar
Luxmoore, R. A. 1985. The energy budget of a population of the Antarctic isopod Serolis polita . p. 389–396. In Siegfried, W. R., Condy, P. R. and Laws, R. M. (eds.), Antarctic Nutrient Cycles and Food Webs. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Martinsson, A. 1962. Ostracodes of the family Beyrichiidae from the Silurian of Gotland. Bulletin of the Geological Institution of the University of Uppsala, 151:1–369.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. 1991. Scheduling of reproduction in relation to molting and growth in malacostracan crustaceans. p. 77–113. In Wenner, A. and Kuris, A. (eds.), Crustacean Egg Production, Crustacean Issues, Volume 7, Balkema, Amsterdam,Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1967. The Mindyallan fauna of north–western Queensland. Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geology and Geophysics, Australia, 74:1–404.Google Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1970. Nepeiid trilobites of the Middle Cambrian of Northern Australia: Bulletin of the Bureau of Mineral Resources Geology and Geophysics, Australia. 113:1–48.Google Scholar
Owen, A. W., and Bruton, D. L. 1980. Late Caradoc—early Ashgill trilobites of the central Oslo Region, Norway. Palaeontological Contributions from the University of Oslo, 245:1–42.Google Scholar
Owens, R. M., Fortey, R. A., Cope, J. C. W., Rushton, A. W. A., and Bassett, M. G. 1982. Tremadoc faunas from the Carmarthen district, South Wales. Geological Magazine, 119:1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. R., and Gatehouse, C. G. 1972. Early and Middle Cambrian trilobites from Antarctica. United States Geological Survey Professional Papers, 456-D:1–36.Google Scholar
Peng, Shan-Chi, 1990. Trilobites of the Panjiazui Formation and the Madaoyu Formation in the Jiangnan Slope Belt. Beringeria, 2:55–271.Google Scholar
Peng, Shan-Chi. 1991. Tremadocian trilobites from Guotang Formation, Luxi, Western Hunan. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 30:141–166.Google Scholar
Perry, D. G., and Chatterton, B. D. E. 1977. Silurian (Wenlockian) trilobites from Baillie-Hamilton Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 14:285–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petruvina, Z. E. 1990. Some new early Ordovician trilobites and news of paleontology and biostratigraphy of the Paleozoic of the Asian part of the USSR (Nekorye novye rannerodorviskie trilobity y novye v paleonetologii i biostratigrafii paleozoya Aziatskoy chasti SSSR). Naukya Science Press, Siberian Department, Novosibirsk, 21–164. [In Russian] Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L., and Edgecombe, G. D. 1991. Trilobite monophyly revisited. Historical Biology, 4:267–283.Google Scholar
Ramsköld, L., and Werdelin, L. 1991. The phylogeny and evolution of some phacopid trilobites. Cladistics, 7:29–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasetti, F. 1955. Lower Cambrian ptychopariid trilobites from the conglomerates of Quebec. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 123:1–35.Google Scholar
Repina, L. N., and Romanenko, E. V. 1978. Trilobity i stratigrafiya nizhnego Kembriya Altaya (Trilobites and stratigraphy of the Lower Cambrian of Altai). Trudy Institut geologii i geofisiki, Sibirskoe otdeleniye, Akademiya nauk SSSR, 382:1–304. [In Russian] Google Scholar
Rosova, A. V. 1968. Biostratigrafiya i Trilobity Verhnego Kembriya i Nizhnego Ordovika Severo-Zapada Sibirskoi Platformy (Biostratigraphy and trilobites of the Upper Cambrian and Lower Ordovician of the northwestern Siberian platform). Trudy Institut geologii i geofisiki, Sibirskoe otdeleniye, Akademiya nauk SSSR, 36:1–196. [In Russian] Google Scholar
Ruedemann, R. 1934. Paleozoic plankton of North America. Memoirs of the Geological Society of America, 2:1–141.Google Scholar
Rushton, A. W. A., and Hughes, N. C. 1996. Biometry, systematics and biogeography of the late Cambrian trilobite Maladioidella abdita . Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences, 86:247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schram, F. R. 1986. Crustacea. Oxford University Press, New York, 606 p.Google Scholar
Schwimmer, D. R. 1989. Taxonomy and biostratigraphic significance of some middle Cambrian trilobites from the Conasauga Formation in western Georgia. Journal of Paleontology, 63:484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shergold, J. H. 1971. Late Upper Cambrian trilobites from the Gola Beds, western Queensland. Bulletin of the Bureau of Resources, Geology and Geophysics Australia, 112:1–126.Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1958. Trilobiti Českého Středního Kambria. Rozpravy ústředního ústavu geologického, 24:1–280. [In Czech] Google Scholar
Šnajdr, M. 1990. Bohemian trilobites. Geological Survey, Prague, 265 p.Google Scholar
Speyer, S. E., and Brett, C. E. 1985. Clustered trilobite assemblages in the Middle Devonian Hamilton Group. Lethaia, 18:85–103.Google Scholar
størmer, L. 1944. On the relationships and phylogeny of fossils and recent Arachnomorpha. Skrifter utgitt av det norske-Videnskaps-Academi i Oslo, series 1, 5:1–158.Google Scholar
Sundberg, F. A. 1994. Corynexochida and Ptychopariida (Trilobita, Arthropoda) of the Ehmaniella biozone (Middle Cambrian), Utah and Nevada. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Contributions in Science, 446:1–137.Google Scholar
Thomas, A. T., Owens, R. M., and Rushton, A. W. A. 1984. Trilobites in British Stratigraphy. Geological Society of London Special Report Number 16:1–78.Google Scholar
Walcott, C. D. 1916 Cambrian Geology and Paleontology, No. 3—Cambrian trilobites. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 64:1–259.Google Scholar
Webby, B. D., Wang, Qi-Zheng, and Mills, K. J. 1988. Upper Cambrian and basal Ordovician trilobites from western New South Wales. Palaeontology, 31:905–938.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1948. Non-agnostidean trilobites of the Middle Cambrian of Sweden. Sveriges geologiska undersökning, Series C, 42:1–32.Google Scholar
Westergård, A. H. 1950. Non-agnostidean trilobites of the Middle Cambrian of Sweden, Pt. 2. Sveriges geologiska undersökning, Series C, 43 (for 1949):1–57.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. C., Cartwright, P., and Hayashi, C. Y. 1993. Arthropod phylogeny: a combined approach. Cladistics, 91–39.Google Scholar
Whittaker, J. E. 1978. On Xestoleberis rubens Whittaker sp. nov: Stereo-Atlas of Ostracod Shells, 5:35–44.Google Scholar
Wills, M. A., Briggs, D. E. G., Fortey, R. A., and Wilkinson, M. 1995. The significance of fossils in understanding arthropod evolution. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft, 88, 203–215.Google Scholar
Wolfart, R. 1974. Die Fauna (Brachiopoda, Mollusca, Trilobita) des älteren Ober-Kambriums (Ober-Kushanian) von Dorah Shah Dad, Südost-Iran, und Surkh Bum Zentral-Afganistan: Geologisches Jahrbuch, Series B, 8:74–184.Google Scholar
Xiang, Li-Wen, and Zhang, Tai-Rong. 1985. Stratigraphy and trilobite faunas of the Cambrian in the western part of northern Tiasnshan, Xinjiang: Geological Memoirs of the Ministry of Geology and Mineral Resources, People's Republic of China, Series 2, 4, 243 p. [In Chinese with English summary] Google Scholar
Yamasaki, T., Makioka, T., and Saito, J. 1988. Morphology, p. 69–132. In Sekiguchi, K. (ed.), The Biology of Horseshoe Crabs. Science House Co., Ltd., Tokyo.Google Scholar
Zhang, Wen-Tang, Lu, Yan-Hao, Shu, Zhao-Ling, Qian, Yi-Yuan, Lin, Huan-Ling, Zhou, Zhi-Yi, Zhang, Sen-Gui, and Yuan, Jin-Liang. 1980. Cambrian trilobite faunas of southwestern China. Palaeontologia Sinica New Series B, 16, 497 p. [In Chinese with English summary] Google Scholar
Zhang, Wen-Tang, and Yuan, Jin-Liang. 1981. Trilobites from the Hsuchuang Formation (lower Middle Cambrian) in western marginal parts of the North China platform. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 187:161–175.Google Scholar
Zhang, , and Jell, P. A. 1987. Cambrian Trilobites of North China. Science Press, Beijing, 459 p.Google Scholar
Zhang, Xi-Guang. 1989. Ontogeny of an Early Cambrian eodiscoid trilobite from Henan, China. Lethaia, 22:13–29.Google Scholar
Zhou, Tien-Mei, Liu, Xi-Ren, Meng, Xian-Song, and Sun, Zhen-Hua. 1977. Trilobites. Paleontological Atlas of Central Southern China, Volume 1. Science Press, Beijing, 470 p. [In Chinese] Google Scholar
Zhuravleva, I. T., and Rosova, A. V. 1977. Biostratigrafii i fauna verkhnego Kembriya i pogranichnykh s nim sloer (novie dannie po azaitskoy chasti SSSR) (Biostratigraphy and fauna of the Upper Cambrian strata and their boundaries [new data from the Asiatic part of the USSR]). Trudy Institut geologii i geofisiki, Sibirskoe otdeleniye, Akademiya nauk SSSR, 313, 357 p. [In Russian] Google Scholar