Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T02:17:09.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New coral-bivalve association (Actinastrea-Lithophaga) from the Eocene of Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Debra K. Krumm
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder 80309-0250
Douglas S. Jones
Affiliation:
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-2035

Abstract

The endolithic mytilid bivalve, Lithophaga palmerae n. sp., from the Upper Eocene Ocala Limestone of north-central Florida, sheds new light on the evolution of lithophagids with its unspecialized morphology and highly specialized mode of life. Lithophaga palmerae n. sp. inhabited dead and living coral as indicated by orientation evidence. In living coral, the anterior end of the borehole was sealed off with thick, continuous, “false floors” of CaCO3, as the posterior end was extended to keep pace with coral growth. To date, this new species of lithophagid has been found associated with only one host coral, Actinastrea cf. A. incrustans (Duncan). Association with living coral is found today in L. bisulcata (d'Orbigny) and L. dixonae Scott from the Caribbean and in several Red Sea and Indo-Pacific lithophagids. In the fossil record, live-coral boring has been reported from the Miocene of the Vienna Basin of Austria and from the Pleistocene of Grand Cayman Island in the Caribbean. Lithophaga palmerae n. sp. provides a valuable ancestral link in the evolution of Lithophaga by extending the range of live-coral boring back to the Eocene of Florida.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, H., and Adams, A. 1857. The Genera of Recent Mollusca. Volume 2 (1854–1858), London, 661 p.Google Scholar
Bertram, G. C. L. 1936. Some aspects of the breakdown of coral at Ghardaqa, Red Sea. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1936:10111026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beurlen, K. 1944. Beiträge zur Stammesgeschichte der Muscheln. Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte, 1–2:133145.Google Scholar
Braunstein, J., Huddlestun, P., and Biel, R. 1988. Gulf Coast Region Correlation Chart. Correlation of Stratigraphic Units of North America (COSUNA) Project. American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Cheetham, A. H. 1963. Late Eocene zoogeography of the eastern Gulf Coast region. Geological Society of America Memoir 91, 113 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. S. 1965. Regional lithostratigraphic analysis of Paleocene and Eocene rocks of Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 45, 105 p.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. W. 1915. The age of the Ocala Limestone. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 95-I:107117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dall, W. H. 1898. Contributions to the Tertiary fauna of Florida. Transactions of the Wagner Free Institute of Science, Philadelphia, 3:511916.Google Scholar
Dockery, D. T. 1977. Mollusca of the Moodys Branch Formation, Mississippi. Mississippi Geological Survey Bulletin 120, 212 p.Google Scholar
Dudley, D. K. 1986. A new species of Lithophaga (Bivalvia) and its paleoecologic implications for the Florida Eocene. Unpubl. , , Gainesville, 105 p.Google Scholar
de Férussac, A. E. 1822. Tableaux Systématiques des Animaux Mollusques. Paris and London, 111 p.Google Scholar
Givens, C. R. 1989. First record of the Tethyan genus Volutilithes (Gastropoda: Volutidae) in the Paleogene of the Gulf Coastal Plain, a discussion of Tethyan molluscan assemblages in the Gulf Coastal Plain and Florida. Journal of Paleontology, 63:852856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, G. D. 1896. The Midway Stage. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 1(4) 164 p.Google Scholar
Harris, G. D. 1919. Pelecypoda of the St. Maurice and Claiborne Stages. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 6(31) 34 p.Google Scholar
Jones, B., and Pemberton, S. G. 1988. Lithophaga borings and their influence on the diagenesis of corals in the Pleistocene Ironshore Formation of Grand Cayman Island, British West Indies. Palaios, 3:321.Google Scholar
Jones, D. S., and Nicol, D. 1989. Eocene clavagellids (Mollusca: Pelecypoda) from Florida: the first documented occurrence in the Cenozoic of the Western Hemisphere. Journal of Paleontology, 63:320323.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. H. 1974. Raumkonkurrenz bei ätzmuscheln. Marine Biology, 26:361364.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. H. 1980a. Korallenbohrender Muschel seit dem Mittleren Lias unverändert. Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich, 7:239249.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. H. 1980b. Boring bivalves and their host corals from the Great Barrier Reef. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 46:1354.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. H. 1982. ätzmuscheln im Ghetto? Beiträge zur Paläontologie von Österreich, 9:211231.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. H. 1983. Catalogue of Recent and fossil Lithophaga (Bivalvia). Journal of Molluscan Studies, Supplement 12, 46 p.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. H. 1990. Evolution of chemically-boring Mytilidae (Bivalvia), p. 111124. In Morton, B. (ed.), The Bivalvia—Proceedings of a Memorial Symposium in Honour of Sir Charles Maurice Yonge, Edinburgh, 1986. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Kleemann, K. H. 1992. Coral communities and coral-bivalve associations in the northern Red Sea at Safaga, Egypt. Facies, 26:110.Google Scholar
Krumm, D. K., and Jones, D. S. 1991a. The paleoecology of the chemically boring bivalve genus Lithophaga. American Malacological Union Program with Abstracts, Berkeley, Annual Meeting, June 30–July 5, 1991:39.Google Scholar
Krumm, D. K., and Jones, D. S. 1991b. A new species of Lithophaga (Mollusca: Bivalvia) from the Florida Eocene: evolutionary and paleogeographic implications for the genus. Geological Society of America Program with Abstracts, 23(5):A168.Google Scholar
Kühnelt, W. 1931. Über ein Massenvorkommen von Bohrmuscheln im Leithakalk von Müllendorf im Burgenland. Palaeobilogica (Wien), 4(3/5):239250.Google Scholar
Linné, C. A. 1758. Systema Naturae per regna tira naturae. Editio decima, reformata, 1, Regnum animale. Holmiae, 824 p.Google Scholar
Mansfield, W. C. 1937. Mollusks of the Tampa and Suwannee Limestones of Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 15, 334 p.Google Scholar
Mokady, O., Bonar, D. B., Arazi, G., and Loya, Y. 1991. Coral host specificity in settlement and metamorphosis of the date mussel Lithophaga lessepsiana (Vaillant, 1865). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 146:205216.Google Scholar
Morton, B. 1990. Corals and their bivalve borers, p. 1146. In Morton, B. (ed.), The Bivalvia—Proceedings of a Memorial Symposium in Honour of Sir Charles Maurice Yonge, Edinburgh, 1986. Hong Kong University Press, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Morton, B., and Scott, P. J. B. 1980. Morphological and functional specializations of the shell, musculature and pallial glands in the Lithophaginae (Mollusca: Bivalvia). Journal of Zoology, London, 192:179203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newell, N. D. 1969. Classification of Bivalvia, p. N205N218. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6(1). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Nicol, D. 1991. Tethyan molluscs of the Middle and Late Eocene of peninsular Florida. Papers in Florida Paleontology, 4, 6 p.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. V. W., and Brann, D. C. 1965. Catalogue of the Paleocene and Eocene Mollusca of the southern and eastern United States: Part I. Pelecypoda, Amphineura, Pteropoda, Scaphopoda, and Cephalopoda. Bulletins of American Paleontology, 48(218):178180.Google Scholar
Puri, H. S. 1957. Stratigraphy and zonation of the Ocala Group. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 38, 248 p.Google Scholar
Rafinesque, C. S. 1815. Analyse de la Nature ou Tableau de l'Univers et des Corps Organisés. Palermo, 224 p.Google Scholar
Randazzo, A. F., Kosters, M., Jones, D. S., and Portell, R. W. 1990. Paleoecology of shallow-marine carbonate environments, middle Eocene of Peninsular Florida. Sedimentary Geology, 66:111.Google Scholar
Richards, H. G., and Palmer, K. 1953. Eocene mollusks from Citrus and Levy Counties, Florida. Florida Geological Survey Bulletin 35, 95 p.Google Scholar
Röding, P. F. 1798. Museum Boltenianum sive Catalogus Cimeliorum e Tribus Regnis Naturae Quae Olim Collegerat Joa. Fried. Bolten, M. D. p. d., Pars Segunda continens Conchylia. Hamburg, 199 p.Google Scholar
Scott, P. J. B. 1986. A new species of Lithophaga (Bivalvia: Lithophaginae) boring corals in the Caribbean. Journal of Molluscan Studies, 52:5561.Google Scholar
Scott, P. J. B. 1987. Associations between corals and macro-infaunal invertebrates in Jamaica, with a list of Caribbean and Atlantic coral associates. Bulletin of Marine Science, 40:271286.Google Scholar
Scott, P. J. B. 1988. Distribution, habitat and morphology of the Caribbean coral- and rock-boring bivalve, Lithophaga bisulcata (d'Orbigny) (Mytilidae: Lithophaginae). Journal of Molluscan Studies, 54:8395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soliman, G. N. 1969. Ecological aspects of some coral-boring gastropods and bivalves of the northwestern Red Sea. American Zoologist, 9:887894.Google Scholar
Soot-Ryen, T. 1955. A report on the family Mytilidae (Pelecypoda). Alan Hancock Pacific Expedition Report 20(1) 175 p.Google Scholar
Soot-Ryen, T. 1969. Superfamily Mytilacea Rafinesque, 1815, p. N271281. In Moore, R. C. and Teichert, C. (eds.), Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Pt. N, Mollusca 6(1). Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Turner, R. D., and Boss, K. J. 1962. The genus Lithophaga in the Western Atlantic. Johnsonia, 4(41):81116.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. R. 1979. A revision of Queensland lithophagine mussels (Bivalvia, Mytilidae, Lithophaginae). Records of the Australian Museum, 32(13);435489.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. R. 1985. Sibling species of Leiosolenus (Bivalvia, Mytilidae, Lithophaginae) boring in living corals in the Indo-West Pacific region. Proceedings of the 5th International Coral Reef Congress Tahiti, 5:183190.Google Scholar