Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T16:45:40.680Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The cost and value of UK defined benefit pension provision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2007

PAUL SWEETING
Affiliation:
University of Bristol and Fidelity Investments International (e-mails: paul.sweeting@bristol.ac.uk and paul.sweeting@uk.fid-intl.com)

Summary

The purposes of this paper are to consider the effect on remuneration of defined benefit pension accrual and the factors that have resulted in changes to the cost and value of this accrual. In this paper, I look at the effect of the change in the cost to an employer of providing a defined benefit pension on the overall cost of remunerating an employee and compare that with the cost of remunerating an employee with no such pension benefits. I allow for the additional cost to the employer of national insurance contributions (‘NICs’). I also look at the change in value of an employee's remuneration, taking into account the value of defined benefit pension accrual and compare this with the change in remuneration for an employee with no such benefits. Here, I allow for employee national insurance contributions and income tax. These assessments look at the cost and value of pension accrual rather than any surplus or deficit relating to previously accrued pension entitlements. I find that costs of employment have risen significantly more for members of defined benefit pension schemes compared with other employees, and that this has largely been as a result of falling long-term interest rates and their effect on the cost of defined benefit pension accrual. The increase in the value of remuneration to employees has shown a similar pattern.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ada, H. Y., Roberts, E., Elliott, R. F., Bell, D. and Scott, A. (2006) Comparing the New Earnings Survey (NES) and the Labour Force Survey (LFS): an analysis of the differences between the data sets and their implications for the pattern of geographical pay in the UK. Regional Studies, 40(6): 645665.Google Scholar
BBC News (2006) BAE seeks to fill pension deficit. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/5075540.stmGoogle Scholar
BBC News (2007) New BA pension details revealed. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/6241971.stmGoogle Scholar
Bolton, T. (1997) Human Resource Management. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brunello, G., Comi, S., and Sonedda, D. (2006) Income taxes and the composition of pay. Discussion Paper No. 2203, Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. and Leicester, A. (2004) Inequality and two decades of British tax and benefit reforms. Fiscal Studies, 25(2): 129158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collard, D., Godwin, M., and Hudson, J. (2005) The provision of company benefits in the UK. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32(7 & 8): 13971421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Continuous Mortality Investigation Mortality Sub-Committee (1990) CMIR12. Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau, London.Google Scholar
Continuous Mortality Investigation Mortality Sub-Committee (1999) CMIR17. Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau, London.Google Scholar
Continuous Mortality Investigation Mortality Sub-Committee (2002) Working Paper 1: An interim basis for adjusting the ‘92’ series mortality projections for cohort effects. Continuous Mortality Investigation Bureau, London.Google Scholar
Dimson, E., Marsh, P., and Staunton, M. (2006) Global Investment Returns Yearbook 2006. ABN Amro, February.Google Scholar
Dobbs, C. (2006) Patterns of pay: results of the annual survey of hours and earnings 1997 to 2005. Labour Market Trends, Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
Fitzner, G. (2006) How have employees fared? Recent UK trends. Employment Relations Research Series No. 56, Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
Forth, J. and Millward, N. (2000) The determinants of pay levels and fringe benefit provision in Britain. Discussion paper 171, National Institute of Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
Fidelity Investments International (2006) Improving Britain's retirement prospects. Viewpoint Discussion Paper, Fidelity International.Google Scholar
Government Actuary's Department (2006) Occupational Pension Schemes 2004: the twelfth survey by the Government Actuary. The Government Actuary's Department, London, June.Google Scholar
Gustman, A. L. and Steinmeier, T. L. (2001) Imperfect knowledge, retirement, and saving. NBER Working Paper 8406, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustman, A. L. and Steinmeier, T. L. (2004) What people don't know about their pensions and social security: an analysis using linked data from the Health and Retirement Study. In Gale, W., Shoven, J., and Warshawsky, M. (eds) Public Policies and Private Pensions. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Lane, Clark and Peacock, (2006) Accounting for Pensions UK and Europe: Annual Survey 2006. Lane, Clark and Peacock.Google Scholar
Lockwood, B. and Manning, A. (1993) Wage setting and the tax system: theory and evidence for the United Kingdom. Journal of Public Economics, 52: 129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, O. S. (1988) Worker knowledge of pension provisions. Journal of Labor Economics, 6(1): 2139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, A. (1977) Life Contingencies. Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Starr-McCluer, M. and Sundén, A. (1999) Workers' knowledge of their pension coverage: a re-evaluation. Federal Reserve Board Discussion paper 1999–5, Federal Reserve Board of Governors.Google Scholar
Sundén, A. (2006) How much do people need to know about their pensions and what do they know? In Holzmann, R. and Palmer, E. (eds) Pension Reform: Issues and Prospects for Non-financial Defined Contribution (NDC) Schemes. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar