Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-26T10:05:43.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The interaction of a conducting object with a supersonic plasma flow: ion deflection near a negatively charged obstacle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

R. L. Merlino  and
N. D'Angelo
R. L. Merlino
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1410
N. D'Angelo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics & Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242-1410
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An experimental study of the interaction of a conducting object with a flowing plasma is described. Particular attention is given to the deflection of ions in the sheath of a negatively charged body. The experiments were conducted in a double plasma device in which a relatively weak longitudinal magnetic field may also be present. For the particular conditions used in these experiments, it was found that ion deflection occurs primarily near the edge of the body. A simple physical model is discussed which accounts for the observed dependences of the convergence of ion streams on the body potential and ion beam velocity. A density rarefaction wave is also observed in the wake region, which propagates into the ambient plasma at roughly the ion acoustic Mach angle. Finally, some preliminary observations of the spatial distribution of plasma noise in the wake region are presented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Plasma Physics , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , April 1987 , pp. 185 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

D'Angelo, N. & Merlino, R. L. 1986 IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science. PS-14, 609.Google Scholar
Martin, A. R. 1974 Planet. Space Sci. 22, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G., Pickett, J., D'Angelo, N. & Kurth, W. S. 1986 Planet. Space Sci. 34, 993.Google Scholar
Nosachev, L. V. & Skvortsov, V. V. 1978 Soviet Phys. Tech. Phys. 23, 658.Google Scholar
Raychaudhuri, S., Hill, J., Chang, H. Y., Tsikis, E. K. & Lonngren, K. E. 1986 Phys. Fluids 29, 289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samir, U., Wright, K. H. & Stone, N. H. 1983 Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 21, 1631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, J. P. M. 1973 Plasma Phys. 15, 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, N. H. 1979 Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alabama in Huntsville.Google Scholar
Stone, N. H. 1981 a J. Plasma Phys. 26, 351.Google Scholar
Stone, N. H. 1981 b J. Plasma Phys. 26, 385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, N. H., Oran, W. A. & Samir, U. 1972 Planet. Space Sci. 20, 1787.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. C. 1967 Planet. Space Sci. 15, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, K. H., Stone, N. H. & Samir, U. 1985 J. Plasma Phys. 33, 71.Google Scholar