Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T15:19:43.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bifurcation of the resistive Alfvén wave spectrum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2009

R. L. Dewar
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics, Research School of Physical Sciences The Australian National University, G.P.O. Box 4, Canberra A.C.T. 2601, Australia
B. Davies
Affiliation:
Department of Theoretical Physics, Research School of Physical Sciences The Australian National University, G.P.O. Box 4, Canberra A.C.T. 2601, Australia

Abstract

A phase integral (WKBJ) theory of damped modes in a resistive cylindrical plasma column is developed. The theory predicts several phenomena observed previously in numerical studies: (i) the complex frequency ω has a point spectrum lying on a locus which is approximately independent of the resistivity, and which intersects the ideal continuum only at its end points (at angles of 45° and 30°); (ii) the qualitative features are independent of current profile and m–number, provided |k.B| is monotonic and strictly positive; and (iii) the two branches of the spectral locus joining the two end points of the ideal continuum correspond to precisely defined ‘internal’ and ‘wall’ modes, and bifurcate from a ‘global’ mode at a certain complex frequency which can be predicted from the topological features of the Stokes diagram in the complex radial position plane. In order to derive consistent connexion formulae for reflexions from the wall, the magnetic axis, and from turning points, we reduce the resistive hydromagnetic equations to a scalar wave equation, uniformly valid over the entire plasma to two orders in an expansion in the square root of the resistivity. Good numerical agreement is found between eigenvalues from the full equations, the reduced equation, and from the WKBJ method.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bernstein, I. B., Frieman, E. A., Kruskal, M. D. & Kulsrud, R. M. 1958 Proc. Roy. Soc. A 244, 17.Google Scholar
Boris, J. P. 1968 Ph. D. Dissertation, Prinop.ton University.Google Scholar
Cross, R. C. 1983 Plasma Phys. 25, 1377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, L. & Hasegawa, A. 1974 Phys. Fluids, 17, 1399.Google Scholar
Dahlquist, G. & Bjork, A. 1974 Numerical Methods, ch. 8. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Davies, B. 1984 a Phys. Lett. 100A, 144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B. 1984 b J. Comp, Appl. Math. (To be published.)Google Scholar
Drake, J. F., Antonsen, T. M., Hassam, A. B. & Gladd, N. T. 1983 Phys. Fluids, 26, 2509.Google Scholar
Furth, H. P., Killeen, J. & Rosenbluth, M. N. 1963 Phys. Fluids, 6, 459.Google Scholar
Heading, J. 1962 An Introduction to Phase Integral Methods. Methuen.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. L., Greene, J. M. & Coppi, B. 1963 Phys. Fluids, 6, 1169.Google Scholar
Kapraff, J. M. & Tataronis, J. A. 1977 J. Plasma. Phys. 18, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, T. 1966 Perturbation Theory for Linear Operators, p. 214. Springer.Google Scholar
Lortz, D. & Spies, G. O. 1984 Phys. Lett. 101 A, 335.Google Scholar
Pao, Y.-P. 1983 Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 28, 1159.Google Scholar
Ryu, C. M. & Grimm, R. C. 1984 J. Plasma Phys. 32, 207.Google Scholar
Sagan, H. 1961 Boundary and Eigenvalue Problems in Mathematical Physics, ch. 5. Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storer, R. G. 1983 Plasma Phys. 25, 1279.Google Scholar
Sy, W. N.-C. 1984 Plasma Phys. Contr. Fusion, 26, 915.Google Scholar
Tataronis, J. A. 1975 J. Plasma. Phys. 13, 87.Google Scholar
White, R. B. 1979 J. Comp. Phys. 31, 409.Google Scholar